Blues Man
Diamond Member
- Aug 28, 2016
- 35,513
- 14,905
- 1,530
Then it's not a first amendment issuePeople are still free to practice their religion just not in huge crowds.What we have is a Christian Taliban who put churches above the law.
It seems pretty clear ...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
Memorize it.
25% or 10 people. Rules that are not in place for a place of business. If you can spread it at church, you can spread it at work.
Fair point.
The building capacity laws should be equal.
WHich is what this was ruled on.
Whether you understand it or not, it is. But in the end it's irrelevant. It's unconstitutional however you want to argue it.
Show me precedent where building capacity limits have been deemed unconstitutional. Not the unfair enforcement but the laws themselves.
I'm not interesting in arguments like this. No one argued or ruled that building capacity limits couldn't be enacted. It was argued they could not be unfairly enforced thereby restricting someone's rights.
Again the law itself is not unconstitutional.
So all that needs to be done is to put the same limits on all buildings open to the public. Problem solved.