Scott Walker Vindicated

[evince]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

 

[hadit]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

Still trying to change the subject. How's that working out for you as people laugh at you?

 

[mamooth]

Republicans are bragging about how only 6 Walker cronies were convicted. After all, to a Republican, that's a clean administration.

So Republicans, for an encore, how do you plan to top this corruption? Take it national? Buy off the judges on a national level? I wouldn't count on it. Unlike Wisconsin, you don't own all the media on the national level, so you won't have them to cover for you.

 

[evince]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

Still trying to change the subject. How's that working out for you as people laugh at you?

you wont be able to bury these FACTS so Walker can run.

 

[kaz]

Republicans are bragging about how only 6 Walker cronies were convicted. After all, to a Republican, that's a clean administration.

So Republicans, for an encore, how do you plan to top this corruption? Take it national? Buy off the judges on a national level? I wouldn't count on it. Unlike Wisconsin, you don't own all the media on the national level, so you won't have them to cover for you.

you know democrats are convicted of fewer crimes how exactly?

 

[evince]

there is no like court record for the dem party







DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
April 1, 2009


In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.

The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. Most recently, in late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the Republican National Committee had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the Republican National Committee asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. The RNC subsequently petitioned for rehearing en banc.

Click here to learn more about voter caging.

Related Court Documents
2012
Petition for Rehearing (2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (2012)

2009
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (2009)
RNC Reply Brief (2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (2009)
Debevoise Opinion (2009)
Debevoise Order (2009)

2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (2008)
Minute Entry (2008)

2004 (Ohio)
Malone Motion to Intervene (2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (2004)
Malone Order (2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (2004)
Malone en banc Decision (2004)
Malone Dismissal (2004)

2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle SD Complaint (2004)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (2004)

2002 (New Jersey)
Order (2002)

1990 (North Carolina)
Order (1990)

1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (1987)

Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Complaint (1981)
Consent Decree (1982

 

[Unkotare]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

Still trying to change the subject. How's that working out for you as people laugh at you?

you wont be able to bury these FACTS so Walker can run.

We've already got plenty of mindless partisan drones like you here, kid. Try something original and act like a rational adult.

 

[The Rabbi]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

Still trying to change the subject. How's that working out for you as people laugh at you?

you wont be able to bury these FACTS so Walker can run.

We've already got plenty of mindless partisan drones like you here, kid. Try something original and act like a rational adult.

I think he's Ignore-worthy. Another left wing drone spewing talking points out his ass.

 

[evince]

why do you hate the supreme court of the united states?

 

[evince]

FACTS!!!!!



this is undeniable Facts

 

[hadit]

run him


Your partys cheating will be in the headlights

Still trying to change the subject. How's that working out for you as people laugh at you?

you wont be able to bury these FACTS so Walker can run.

And how does this exonerate Bernie Sanders?

 

[hadit]

FACTS!!!!!



this is undeniable Facts

And how does this exonerate Bernie Sanders?

 

[evince]

you are off topic

 

[hadit]

why do you hate the supreme court of the united states?

How does this exonerate Hillary?

 

[hadit]

you are off topic

I don't think you've managed to find the topic yet. But please keep trying, you're funny.

 

[hadit]

FACTS!!!!!



this is undeniable Facts

This is too!!!!