Schumer's pipe dream, a trial with.....you know.....evidence.

[RoshawnMarkwees]

No they didn’t.

Yes they did, and YOU know it, just read the online transcripts and you can see EVERY lying Republiscum had the exact same time to question each witness as the Dems.

Like I said when the worthless lying scum Right tell such obvious lies they expose the fact that they themselves KNOW they are WRONG!

Dems interviewing gov officials in a closet is not exactly a fair process.
Hillary lost, get over it or move to your NewSSR.

Were Republicans in that closet as well?

No

That's a lie, there was a republican present at every interview. Trump Humpers lie like a rug.

Wrong. They were shut out. Democrats think they own the gov.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You do if you want your accusation to carry any weight among rational reasoned people.

You assert that Giuliani was working on a private, not public, matter because he is Trumps private attorney; absent the explanation noted above, your conclusion does not in any way necessarily follow from the fact you present.

Why did you crop my response?

Unless you can explain how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, your accusation cannot hold water with rational, reasoned people.

Well?

Do rational people ignore information that is counter to their beliefs?

Thank you for admitting you cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thusly demonstrating your accusation will not hold water with rational, reasoned people.

You’re asking a hypothetical. I’m stating a factual.

No. You made an unsupportable assumption.
You cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thus you cannot demonstrate your assumption to be sound.

 

[busybee01]

Hey dumbass, the House was NOT a trial, the Senate is!!!!

That's right. It's not an investigative body.

No new witnesses, asshole.

So no witnesses are allowed at trials????

Heil Schiffler!

The Senate is The Jury.
The Trial is over.

The Senate only consider the failed Clown Show Adolph Schiffler put on when he denied 10 Witnesses the GOP requested and additionally denied access to two Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found them credible and was confirmed by other witnesses. The only 2 witnesses that were germane testified.

Wrong.

It was right. The whistleblower's complaint was deemed credible by the IG and confirmed by other witnesses. The 2 germane witnesses testified.

 

[busybee01]

So Due Process is Something you oppose?

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

Due process is a part of the criminal justice system. Not a impeachment trial.

Wrong, but thanks for admitting you are opposed to due process.

There is no such thing as due process. Trump was offered a chance to participate but declined.

 

[Siete]

Why did you crop my response?

Unless you can explain how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, your accusation cannot hold water with rational, reasoned people.

Well?

Do rational people ignore information that is counter to their beliefs?

Thank you for admitting you cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thusly demonstrating your accusation will not hold water with rational, reasoned people.

You’re asking a hypothetical. I’m stating a factual.

No. You made an unsupportable assumption.
You cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thus you cannot demonstrate your assumption to be sound.

and you cant prove he doesnt -

keep trying though ..........

 

[The Original Tree]

So Due Process is Something you oppose?

The dems should have/could have slowed things up and got it right. Instead, it was a sprint for them. Should have used the courts.

As you well know, if the Dems continued to let pathological lying scum POS Tramp stall using the courts, it would have gone well past the election allowing the scumbag to CHEAT yet again and steal another election.
But that's what you Trump Chumps want!

Due process is a part of the criminal justice system. Not a impeachment trial.

Wrong, but thanks for admitting you are opposed to due process.

There is no such thing as due process. Trump was offered a chance to participate but declined.

I like the way you think, Comrade. Don't you think today is a glorious day for Mother Russia?

 

[georgephillip]

Not Just One crime, but he was booted from The White House and has his clearance downgraded for Leaking classified Information on calls between The President Thailand, Australia and Mexico.

Did Thailand, Australia, or Mexico provide any information on Hunter Biden that Ukraine and China missed, Moron

The full scope of Trump's threat to US national security will probably never see the light of day; if it does, it will be decades after the useless eater dies in prison.

Trump–Ukraine scandal - Wikipedia

"Immediately after the Trump–Zelensky call ended, White House national security aides discussed their deep concerns, with at least one National Security Council (NSC) official alerting White House national security lawyers.[27][28]

"A text message between a State department envoy to Ukraine and a Ukrainian official showed the envoy understood from the White House that a Zelensky visit with Trump was contingent upon Ukraine's investigating a conspiracy theory about alleged Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[29]

"Records of the Trump–Zelensky call were moved from the system where presidential call transcripts are typically stored to a system reserved for the government's most sensitive secrets.[24][30][11][12]

"The Trump administration had also similarly restricted access to records of Trump's conversations with the leaders of China,[31] Russia, Saudi Arabia,[32] and Australia.[2]

"It was subsequently revealed that this placement was made for political rather than for national security reasons, which are the only valid reasons to use such a server.[33]"

Do you actually expect us to believe that you give a damn about American security?

Do you actually expect us to believe that you give a damn about American security?

Trump doesn't.

 

[jc456]

The best one I heard was last night, on Tucker, he asked if all of the house demofk members vote for the articles, and none are asking for more witnesses, the testifying is over. That is the job of the house, why is it then that Schumer needs witnesses? How can House dems then vote?

 

[colfax_m]

Why did you crop my response?

Unless you can explain how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, your accusation cannot hold water with rational, reasoned people.

Well?

Do rational people ignore information that is counter to their beliefs?

Thank you for admitting you cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thusly demonstrating your accusation will not hold water with rational, reasoned people.

You’re asking a hypothetical. I’m stating a factual.

No. You made an unsupportable assumption.
You cannot explain how how or why the President's private lawyer can only represent the President in his persona/private issues, to the full exclusion of public or policy issues, and thus you cannot demonstrate your assumption to be sound.

Giuliani’s public statements support my assertion.

 

[busybee01]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

The prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ dismissed the complaint because NO CRIME was proven and because there were NO WITNESSES.

It only shows that Barr has corrupted the DOJ to protect Trump.

 

[The Original Tree]

Not Just One crime, but he was booted from The White House and has his clearance downgraded for Leaking classified Information on calls between The President Thailand, Australia and Mexico.

Did Thailand, Australia, or Mexico provide any information on Hunter Biden that Ukraine and China missed, Moron

The full scope of Trump's threat to US national security will probably never see the light of day; if it does, it will be decades after the useless eater dies in prison.

Trump–Ukraine scandal - Wikipedia

"Immediately after the Trump–Zelensky call ended, White House national security aides discussed their deep concerns, with at least one National Security Council (NSC) official alerting White House national security lawyers.[27][28]

"A text message between a State department envoy to Ukraine and a Ukrainian official showed the envoy understood from the White House that a Zelensky visit with Trump was contingent upon Ukraine's investigating a conspiracy theory about alleged Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.[29]

"Records of the Trump–Zelensky call were moved from the system where presidential call transcripts are typically stored to a system reserved for the government's most sensitive secrets.[24][30][11][12]

"The Trump administration had also similarly restricted access to records of Trump's conversations with the leaders of China,[31] Russia, Saudi Arabia,[32] and Australia.[2]

"It was subsequently revealed that this placement was made for political rather than for national security reasons, which are the only valid reasons to use such a server.[33]"

Do you actually expect us to believe that you give a damn about American security?

Do you actually expect us to believe that you give a damn about American security?

Trump doesn't.

Thank you for your service Comrade, and continue to keep up the good work with disseminating lies, propaganda, and sowing division among The American People.

Today will go down in history as a Glorious day for Mother Russia and we thank you for helping us achieve our objective!

 

[The Original Tree]

Whistleblowers (Really Criminals who filed False Reports).

The IG found the report CREDIBLE, and I will take over lying scum like you and Tramp!

No he didn't, moron.

Yes he did, LIAR!

The prosecutorial divisions of the DOJ dismissed the complaint because NO CRIME was proven and because there were NO WITNESSES.

It only shows that Barr has corrupted the DOJ to protect Trump.

See, right there is why I love you Man! Thank you for serving as an agent of The Kremlin.

Glorious and Beautiful day for Mother Russia, and we have you to thank for it!

 

[easyt65]

Wrong. The whistleblower was not needed and none of the witnesses are germane with the exception of the 2 witnesses who testified..

Wrong, you ignorant b!tch. In this country we have the Constitutional and legal right to face our accusers.

The reason the ' Whistle Blower's is NOT needed, though, is because:

1) According to the Whistle Blower law itself the Whistle Blower does not qualify as a ' Whistle Blower's

2) The prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ ALREADY DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT prior to the Dems manufacturing a false Impeachable offense out of it because the FOJ found there was NO CRIME & NO WITNESSES.
-- This is already undeniable, reported, recorded FACT...only lying, lie-parroting morons lime you continue to claim otherwise.

EVERY PERSON WHO TESTIFIED in both Schiff's and Nadler's failed coup hearings ADMITTED THEY WITNESSED NOTHING.

...BUT YOU CONTINUE TO LIE YOUR ASS OFF TO DEFEND TRAITORS PROVEN TO HAVE ENDANGERED OUR NATIONAL SECURITY - AS STATED BY THE FISA Court- LIKE IT WAS YOU HAVING BEEN EXPOSED FOR COMMITTING THESE CRIMES.

 

[georgephillip]

BTW, has anyone heard a word from witness #1 ... the "whistleblower?" About "whistleblower" #2?

Why would any rational observer need to hear from witnesses whose written complaint is comprehensive, detailed, and has been fully corroborated by documents and individuals with first-hand knowledge?

Tell us again why Trump is too timid to testify in his own defense and why this would upset you more if he hadn't switched political parties.

Only a Stalinist douchebag would ask such a question.

Only a Stalinist douchebag would ask such a question.

I never voted for Stalin (or Hitler)

The world's leading expert on Hitler refused to write about Trump for months. Then everything changed

 

[The Original Tree]

BTW, has anyone heard a word from witness #1 ... the "whistleblower?" About "whistleblower" #2?

Why would any rational observer need to hear from witnesses whose written complaint is comprehensive, detailed, and has been fully corroborated by documents and individuals with first-hand knowledge?

Tell us again why Trump is too timid to testify in his own defense and why this would upset you more if he hadn't switched political parties.

Only a Stalinist douchebag would ask such a question.

Only a Stalinist douchebag would ask such a question.

I never voted for Stalin (or Hitler)

The world's leading expert on Hitler refused to write about Trump for months. Then everything changed

Yes, yes more of that. Mother Russia needs devoted Soldiers like you to carry the banner of Socialism all across the Imperialist American Continent.

Today is a GLORIOUS DAY for Mother Russia, and you are part of our success.

Thank You For Your Service

 

[busybee01]

Why would any rational observer need to hear from witnesses whose written complaint is comprehensive, detailed, and has been fully corroborated by documents and individuals with first-hand knowledge?

You are either a moron or a f*ing liar - which is it?

1. The non-qualifying whistle blower admittedly has ZERO 1st hand knowledge of the debunked accusations in their complaint.

2. The prosecutorial divisions within the DOJ REJECTED the complaint because NO CRIME was proven to have been committed, & there were NO WITNESSESS.

In Schiff's coup circus hearings EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO TESTIFIED ADMITTED THEY PERSONALLY WITNESSED NOTHING ... and when asked directly to name the crime the President committed THEY COULD NOT DO IT.

In the end, they proved themselves to be MORONS like YOU, just parroting and repeating debunked BS and hearsay they had heard.

.

1. He is a whistleblower according to federal law.

2. The prosecutorial division within THE DOJ IS CORRUPT. THERE WERE SEVERL WITNESSES INCLUDING THE ROUGH TRANSCRIPT WHICH CONFIRMED THE WHISTLEBLOWER'S INFO.

There was no coup as impeachment is a legal process. You are the MORON as Trump tells you exactly what to think.

 

[easyt65]

It only shows that Barr has corrupted the DOJ to protect Trump.

You're a f*ing moron if you think the DOJ rejecting hearsay from an admitted Trump-hating, Biden-connected Deep State CIA Agent who witnessed NOTHING is a sign the DOJ has been corrupted.

Read the FISA REPORT and the FISA Court's rebuke of Rosenstein, Comey, and the proven / confirmed criminal FBI and conspirators who broke laws, trampled the Constitution, Anand who have endangered our national security for Democrat Party gain!

 

[busybee01]

Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'
Sen. Schumer: If Republicans refuse witnesses they’re 'engaged in a cover-up'


View attachment 295109
Bwuhahahahahaha......


View attachment 295108

.

The witnesses Schumer wanted were actually germane to the issue. The witnesses House Republicans wanted except for 2 were not germane to the issue. The germane witnesses did testify. They didn't help Trump at all.

Well, aren't you the one to judge what is pertinent and what isn't.
The whistleblower and Schiff were very germane to the case, no matter what your
Cracker Jack box law degree tells you.
idiot

I am a better judge than you as I did not vote for either Trump or Clinton.
The whistleblower was not needed and Schiff is not germane. You don't need a law degree to see that.

Bless your heart, child.
The person who brought the issue up IS germane no matter who you voted for. Also, Schiff and his shenanigans
does become relevant no matter who you voted for.

The person who brought up the issue is no longer germane as other have confirmed his information. Schiff is not relevant.

 

[easyt65]

1. He is a whistleblower according to federal law.

STFU LIAR!

I posted the exact Law and link to it while you have OBVIOUSLY not even read it. It does NOT afford this Deep State coup-conspirator ' Whistle Blower' status... You are a LIAR....

Just like DragonLady who claimed, like Schiff, that the Law affords the non-qualifying Whistle Blower with ANONYMITY & IMMUNITY! IT DOES NOT.

I am sick and tired of lying, Trump-hating, Democrat / fake news-parroting, opinionated snowflake trolls pushing their lies without EVER posting anything - no links, testimony, reports, etc... - especially YOU not doing so to back up the lies you spread.

I could not get past your 1st lie....enough is enough, troll.

 

[georgephillip]

It was their job to prove their case. They refused to wait for court decisions on Subpoenas and refused to allow GOP witnesses testify, refused to allow witnesses cross examined, because they wanted Impeachment under The Christmas Tree for Christmas.

Grinch Trump was stonewalling all subpoena requests for individuals and documents in hopes of running out the clock before next November. Do you suppose that has anything to do with statute of limitations restrictions over his pending Russian collusion/obstruction charges?

Michael Cohen: "Individual 1 is Donald J. Trump"

Liberal Dictionary:
================================================
Stonewalling: Pursuing the legal means the Constitution makes available to you.

Liberal Dictionary:
================================================
Stonewalling: Pursuing the legal means the Constitution makes available to you.

Get back to me when you elect a POTUS who's read the Constitution.
All the times Trump said the constitution let's him do whatever he wants

It definitely allows him to pursue Congressional demands all the way to the Supreme Court.

Do you disagree?

It definitely allows him to pursue Congressional demands all the way to the Supreme Court.

Do you disagree?

There's no Constitutional provision for refusing ALL congressional requests for documents AND individuals relating to a impeachment proceeding.

House Judiciary Committee passes articles of impeachment against Trump - WQOW