Again..........evolution is not represented with changes WITHIN SPECIES, all life has the ability to adapt to their surroundings. Have you read the Theory of Evolution as taught by Darwin? Repeat the same circular logic over and over and it becomes truth?
Darwinian cultists teach Darwinism as truth in our schools. The basic tenet of Darwinian Evolution is stated with no ambiguity whatsoever. "Darwin's theory of evolution is the widely held belief that all life on earth is related and descended from a common ancestor. (in other words ALL LIFE began as a simple organism and evolved outside species.......from DEAD MATTER); The birds, the bananas, the fish and the flowers, all related. Darwin's general theory presumes the development of life from non life and stresses a purely naturalistic decent with modifications."
Now you are attempting to suggest that losing part of a DNA signature as was the case by necessity when an elephant lost the ability to grow tusks when previous generations was complete with tusks........within the same species is the same theory as Darwinism? Really?
Prove me wrong.........demonstrate the fossils remains of an animal (outside of species) that evolved into an example of biological life called, AN ELEPHANT. What was the elephant before mutation caused it to evolve from its lower lifeform?\
Regardless of how many tusks, teeth, legs, ears, etc., an elephant has........ITS STILL AN ELEPHANT. Just like a dog, a wolf, a coyote, etc. are of the same species, they may have adapted in different ways to their surroundings, but still all are examples of Canis. The same for all the different types of Bovine....Cows, Yak, water buffalo...etc. That is not DAWIANIAN EVOLUTION.
Pasteur clearly proved that Biogenesis is a FACT of SCIENCE. Life can only be reproduced (within species) by preexisting life (within species).
Darwin is suggesting that MUTATION adds onto an existing strain of DNA with NEW INFORMATION.......and you are presenting the OPPOSITE and claim that is an example of DARWINIAN EVOLUTION? Again really?
Darwin's Theory Of Evolution
There is a difference between Vertical and Horizonal evolution. Horizonal evolution (within species) is a fact of science (all life can make small changes in order to adapt to their surroundings or fight off disease, or man would have became extinct with the first disease he encountered, or the first severe weather event he encountered (different skin colors, yet all men share the same LIfe's Blood signature, and ALL MEN are of the same species, and there is no evidence that man evolved from fish as suggested by Darwin).....Vertical Evolution (decent from outside species)...i.e., Darwinian Evolution is always falsified by Science whenever put to the test of the Scientific Method to determine Facts of Science.