saving legal liabilities an increasing safety by serving lower proof liquors

[ROLAND]

could a bussiness reduce insurance costs an liability damages thru developing a owner prefference limit on the proof of alcohol Sold in bars Clubs an Bussinesses (simply for example a 70 proof limit on hard liquors.,, a 5.0 on beers) limited to single shots only applicable adjustments to serving rules to create yer own comfort zone,.. just for the simple reasoning of preventing fights accidents/esp automotive liability risks Lude an publicly undesirable points of premature intoxication//

 

[Granny]

State alcohol boards usually set the standards for businesses involved in the sale of alcohol. I would think it would not be hard for these businesses to enforce even tighter restrictions on themselves, but they probably would not be in business very long. People who go out specifically for the purpose of drinking want to do just that: drink. A business could and should refuse to sell any more alcohol to someone who is obviously snockered.

 

[ROLAND]

The state has set regulations (however for practical purposes our states have used unsafe measures of alcoholic beverages despite statitical damages to self property an families,.) an reasonable or ethical person would determine that extreamly potent mixtures Recipie tward disaster,.. As a bussiness ethical code an constitutional rights,.. Such as the rights of children an damaged parties in these situations,.. Insurance companies Gov an bussinessmen should realize The gains of responcibility,..

 

[Black_Label]

Many red states already have very strict alcohol guidelines and I've never seen any correlation to any kind of reduced risks because of their big government interventions.