Satellite Temperature Data Errors Revealed

[jc456]

And this would be why the fabrication is being pushed..

RSS Shows No Warming For 15 Years

The pause has now exceeded 15 years in three data sets...

There has been no cooling for 100 years.

No need to fabricate anything.

LOL...

There have been durations if increase and durations of decrease in the last 100 years. Disingenuous, you are..

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

we came out of an Ice Age 12,000 years ago.

So you're saying the ice age is done? Hahahaha

 

[jc456]

DENIER, in this context, refers to those who deny anthropogenic global warming, despite the overwhelming CONSENSUS among active climate scientists and scientists in general that it is a valid description of the current behavior of the Earth's climate sytem.

Cult:
1.
a particular system of religious worship, especially with reference to its rites and ceremonies.
2.
an instance of great veneration of a person, ideal, or thing, especially as manifested by a body of admirers: the physical fitness cult.
3.
the object of such devotion.
4.
a group or sect bound together by veneration of the same thing, person, ideal, etc.
5.
Sociology. a group having a sacred ideology and a set of rites centering around their sacred symbols.
6.
a religion or sect considered to be false, unorthodox, or extremist, with members
often living outside of conventional society under the direction of a charismatic leader.
7.
the members of such a religion or sect.

Given these definitions for cult, Frank, please explain how you understand the terms denier and consensus to be "cultish".

Denier is a cult word used to denigrate "nonbelievers" who dare to question the sacred properties of the CO2 molecule

It is a descriptive term - the common thread amongst you all is that you deny what the experts accept. Sanctity is not involved.

Again, and as Crick was so kind to highlight, neither denier nor cult are terms of science, but are only used by Cults

Though they are unlikely to be used by anyone outside of sociology, I made no such contention. This would be another of your failures to comprehend the written word.

Newton's Theory of Gravity had a 99+% Consensus factor thereby making Einstein a Gravity Denier

Save for one minor point. Relativity does not refute Newtonian gravity.

Wrong I challenge them to prove their models and to date that hasn't happened

 

[jc456]

You cannot use the word cult to define the word cult. I just had a visit from the Jehovah's Witnesses this morning and their flyer claimed that we should believe the Bible because in the Bible, God tells us that all scripture is inspired of God. D'ye see the problem laddie?

It sounds like exactly what you are doing, hmmm, I see no difference frank is right. Say you're sorry

 

[jc456]

T

LOL...

There have been durations if increase and durations of decrease in the last 100 years. Disingenuous, you are..

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

Who do you believe is acting as if warming has never happened before?

Hmmmmmm

 

[jc456]

T

LOL...

There have been durations if increase and durations of decrease in the last 100 years. Disingenuous, you are..

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

You got to remember most of the pixies and temperature records at the time of these studies where northern North America and Europe. This is no where near global...A global study was done that shows that it was much cooler then today 1000 years ago.

Where does most of the cold occur?

 

[jc456]

What did Mamooth say? By denier logic, humans cannot cause forest fires.

And they can put them out, your point?

 

[jc456]

T

LOL...

There have been durations if increase and durations of decrease in the last 100 years. Disingenuous, you are..

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

Those are proxy estimates, no way near as accurate as the direct instrument measurements we have now.

Really? Prove it!

 

[ScienceRocks]

T

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

You got to remember most of the pixies and temperature records at the time of these studies where northern North America and Europe. This is no where near global...A global study was done that shows that it was much cooler then today 1000 years ago.

Where does most of the cold occur?

China and the North Atlantic appears to have been warmer then normal. The middle east, central Asia and western Canada appears to have been cooler.

 

[jc456]

And you get to determine the real data sets, correct? LOL. You don't even know basic science, let alone what goes into making an accurate data set.

Why would I? I want those who get paid to!

 

[jc456]

T

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

You got to remember most of the pixies and temperature records at the time of these studies where northern North America and Europe. This is no where near global...A global study was done that shows that it was much cooler then today 1000 years ago.

Where does most of the cold occur?

China and the North Atlantic appears to have been warmer then normal. The middle east, central Asia and western Canada appears to have been cooler.

Says who?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

 

[jc456]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

Where's the actual temperatures?

 

[ScienceRocks]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

Where's the actual temperatures?

Lol, that's the anomaly compared to today. -2.5c cooler to 1.4c warmer....The cold anomalies are large enough to suggest that the global temperature was probably a good amount below today.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

Where's the actual temperatures?

Lol, that's the anomaly compared to today. -2.5c cooler to 1.4c warmer....The cold anomalies are large enough to suggest that the global temperature was probably a good amount below today.

Oh Look here.. another FAILED MODEL... Empirical evidence shows that your anomaly based crap is.. well... CRAP!

Whom to believe... Paleontologists and geologists or a fantasy land model... Hmmmmm

 

[Billy_Bob]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

Where's the actual temperatures?

Considering we must look at 100 year compilations (averages) as data single points his "anomalies" is pure bull shit misdirection.

 

[jc456]

Also the Enso was in a state that favored la nina's and was cooler over the eastern pacific.

Where's the actual temperatures?

Lol, that's the anomaly compared to today. -2.5c cooler to 1.4c warmer....The cold anomalies are large enough to suggest that the global temperature was probably a good amount below today.

So you have no temperatures

 

[edthecynic]

T

there have only been significant increases over the last 100 years, NO significant cooling. You get sharp warming followed by a flat period and then another sharp warming period. We are now in our second flat period which will be followed by our third period of sharp warming I predict.

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

Those are proxy estimates, no way near as accurate as the direct instrument measurements we have now.

Really? Prove it!

Where proxy data overlaps direct instrument data the proxy data is way off.

 

[jc456]

T

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

Those are proxy estimates, no way near as accurate as the direct instrument measurements we have now.

Really? Prove it!

Where proxy data overlaps direct instrument data the proxy data is way off.

How can that be? Proy data is history and they didn't have measuring equipment then. Unless you know something the rest off us don't!

 

[jc456]

T

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

You got to remember most of the pixies and temperature records at the time of these studies where northern North America and Europe. This is no where near global...A global study was done that shows that it was much cooler then today 1000 years ago.

Where does most of the cold occur?

China and the North Atlantic appears to have been warmer then normal. The middle east, central Asia and western Canada appears to have been cooler.

Have you ever heard of a thermometer? It reads temperatures not anomalies that is calculated and has nothing to do with cold or warm!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

T

Could it be because we are coming out of an ice age? Also, temperatures have been several degrees warmer in the past.

they work hard to ignore facts

View attachment 39463
They act like warming has never happened ed before

Those are proxy estimates, no way near as accurate as the direct instrument measurements we have now.

Really? Prove it!

Where proxy data overlaps direct instrument data the proxy data is way off.

So you too agree that Shankuns proxies are crap