san francisco may ban infant circumsion

Circumcision is elective mutilation. There is not one sound medical reason to continue the practice.

It sould be considered child abuse, even sexual abuse.

It would be a crime if done to an adult without their permission.

Not so long ago, boys were castrated so they could become opera stars. I'm sure there were people who opposed banning that too.
 
The teen was under anesthesia for the procedure but as I'm sure you realize there is always post operative pain. It can take weeks for a circumcision to fully heal.

Again as long as you think that there was no pain it's OK? And are you really comparing the pain of a diaper rash to that of circumcision?

Tell me why do many countries ban ear cropping in dogs for being inhumane and many veterinarians in this country refuse to crop ears or dock tails even though it's not illegal yet it's perfectly fine to circumcise boys?

I have someone close to me that was not circumsized and developed a severe infection when he was young. He was too embarrassed to tell anyone about it so it just got worse. He wishes every day that he was circumcized as a child.

I'm not comparing the two pains, but simply saying that children are caused pain all of the time. Most of the time they don't remember. The average person who is circumcized doesn't remember, and isn't affected by it later in life...that is of course unless their obssessed with it. I haven't given it a second thought until now, and it still doesn't bother me.

And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
 
I have someone close to me that was not circumsized and developed a severe infection when he was young. He was too embarrassed to tell anyone about it so it just got worse. He wishes every day that he was circumcized as a child.

I'm not comparing the two pains, but simply saying that children are caused pain all of the time. Most of the time they don't remember. The average person who is circumcized doesn't remember, and isn't affected by it later in life...that is of course unless their obssessed with it. I haven't given it a second thought until now, and it still doesn't bother me.

And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.
 
Circumcision is elective mutilation. There is not one sound medical reason to continue the practice.

total bullmal there skull...

Phimosis

So a less than 10% chance of tight foreskin is reason to subject all boys to circumcision?

Tell me what is a female's chance of getting breast cancer in her lifetime?

Should all girls have mastectomies at birth to prevent this disease which is arguably more severe than a tight foreskin?

No one is subjecting all boys to circumcision. This is a parents individual decision. There are no laws forcing anyone to do anything.

I would think you boys would have a bigger problem if all women had their breasts cut off. ...just saying.
 
And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

Dad teaches junior how and where to piss, they often have contests to see who can piss the farthest and still hit the john.. I think it's hilarious myself.
 
Circumcision is elective mutilation. There is not one sound medical reason to continue the practice.

It sould be considered child abuse, even sexual abuse.

It would be a crime if done to an adult without their permission.

Not so long ago, boys were castrated so they could become opera stars. I'm sure there were people who opposed banning that too.

Not exactly the same thing. You aren't removing an organ, you're removing a bit of skin.
 
If someone wants to be circumcised, they should be allowed to do it once they are about the age when they should be allowed to get their ears pierced. Why anyone would want to mutilate a defenceless baby is beyond me. It should be illegal.


They pierce new born ears all the time.
 
And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

You don't have kids, do you? At least not boys.

Little boys are taught how to pee by dads if they're around, so yes, they certainly do compare.
 
Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

Dad teaches junior how and where to piss, they often have contests to see who can piss the farthest and still hit the john.. I think it's hilarious myself.
Since when do you need a foreskin to piss? In anycase, let the child decide for himself when he is old enough. You can always cut it off but you can't put it back.
 
If someone wants to be circumcised, they should be allowed to do it once they are about the age when they should be allowed to get their ears pierced. Why anyone would want to mutilate a defenceless baby is beyond me. It should be illegal.


They pierce new born ears all the time.
Unfortunately, they do.
 
And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

How do you think they learn to pee into a toilet? Daddy shows them how.
 
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

Dad teaches junior how and where to piss, they often have contests to see who can piss the farthest and still hit the john.. I think it's hilarious myself.
Since when do you need a foreskin to piss? In anycase, let the child decide for himself when he is old enough. You can always cut it off but you can't put it back.


I never said anything about the ability to pee with or without a foreskin. I did say one of the reasons circumcision happens is so that little boys will look like their daddy.
 
Little baby's bodies are beautiful just they way they are. We should respect that and leave them alone.
 
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

Dad teaches junior how and where to piss, they often have contests to see who can piss the farthest and still hit the john.. I think it's hilarious myself.
Since when do you need a foreskin to piss? In anycase, let the child decide for himself when he is old enough. You can always cut it off but you can't put it back.

Look chick,, if adults can decide to kill an infant, parents can decide to circumcise him,, at least he gets to live that way.. you have no moral leg to stand on. get over it. It should be parental choice.
 
If someone wants to be circumcised, they should be allowed to do it once they are about the age when they should be allowed to get their ears pierced. Why anyone would want to mutilate a defenceless baby is beyond me. It should be illegal.


They pierce new born ears all the time.
Unfortunately, they do.


You say yourself that circumcision should happen at the same age ear piercing happens. Both can and do happen to newborns.
 
15th post
Dad teaches junior how and where to piss, they often have contests to see who can piss the farthest and still hit the john.. I think it's hilarious myself.
Since when do you need a foreskin to piss? In anycase, let the child decide for himself when he is old enough. You can always cut it off but you can't put it back.

Look chick,, if adults can decide to kill an infant, parents can decide to circumcise him,, at least he gets to live that way.. you have no moral leg to stand on. get over it. It should be parental choice.
It's not legal to kill infants.
 
And that's a reason to continue the practice?

When the only reason one can come up with is "It's done all the time" is that a good enough reason for intelligent people to continue said tradition?

It might be for you but it isn't for me.


Most little boys want to look like their daddy.
How do you know? Do daddies and little boys sit around comparing dicks?
My BF is uncut. His two brothers are. No one remembers what their father was.

When boys are little they notice...particularly when you're trying to teach them to pee. They also have a habit of walking in on you when you're in the shower. They want to know if theirs is the same; they also want theirs to be the same. They question it otherwise and sometimes feel "left out" of the family even when they get older.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: blu
Back
Top Bottom