where in the heck is the ACLU now? Why aren't they defending these people's first amendment rights?
this is utter bull crap imo.
They are not into protecting the rights of Christians, never have been.
The ACLU Fights for Christians
Fail.
It appears the majority of the links you claim are in defense of the ACLU for Christian is erroneous.
links
1. A prisoner wanting to be a preacher. 1 Timothy 3:2
2. A claim of defending a quaker... Actually a plea for help from the ACLU...to sign a PAC letter.
3. An invalid link.
4. A story claimed to be from the Washington Post yet not actually linked to the Washington Post.
5. The ACLU defending Gay pro rights in Florida.
6. A copy of a letter with an ACLU letter head stamp.
7. Appears genuine. Article written by the ACLU. No outside source available.
8. The ACLU forces a city to get a Christmas tree which is not generally considered to be a religious symbol.
In its letter to the county sent Tuesday, the ACLU cited case law that found government displays of religious symbols on their own could be perceived as an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. But government displays that included secular holiday symbols, like Christmas trees, alongside religious symbols, did not endorse religion.
9. ACLU defending free speech rights of gays of public protest on privately owned property "Walmart".
10. An ACLU written article. Appears to be genuine. No outside source available.
11. Another prisoner denied the right to be a preacher. Again read 1 Timothy - Chapter 3:2
12. It appears that this is another ploy of the ACLU to tell a Church ran program how they will conform or else.
13. Appears to be genuine. Again an article written by the ACLU. No outside source available.
NEWARK, NJ -- The American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey today announced that it is seeking to participate as a friend-of-the-court in the case of a second-grade student who was barred from singing a religious song in a voluntary, after-school talent show.
14. Appears to be genuine another article from the ACLU no outside sources.
""While it is true that the Constitution forbids public schools to promote religion, schools must be careful not to suppress the private religious expression of students,"" said ACLU of Michigan Legal Director Michael J. Steinberg, who represented the student. ""In this case, a high school purported to create an open forum for student expression, yet censored a student's speech because it was religious in nature.""
The rest are releases from ACLU with no outside sources available.
So I take back the "never" and stand corrected.