Sally Yates testifies tomorrow and the alt right is running for cover

[toomuchtime_]

When some one is unmasked only the person who requested it is given the name, so either she requested it or she knows who did, and passing that piece of classified information is a crime, so if she is not lying to Congress about requesting it, she knows who did and by not reporting them, she is complicit in their crime.

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

You don't know that... and the Senator's today were asking if there is some kind of way that it is recorded who requests and unmasks Americans in situations like Flynn's. Jesus dude, you think you know more than the Ex head of the DNI, acting AG, and U.S. Senators? That might be the funniest thing I've read all day.

What I said is pretty much what Clapper said today.

 

[Lewdog]

Good lord, if you are going to make comments you need to watch and pay attention to this shit. You are wrong.

lol No, I am exactly right.

No, you're wrong. Clapper and Yates just testified under oath in front of Senators, of whom knows most of the laws about this stuff and had Yates and Clapper lied, they would have been called out on it, right then and there. In fact, Cruz tried to get Yates in a "gotcha" moment and she handed his ass to him.

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Yes he did lie to the FBI. WTF you think they brought it up?

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol No, I am exactly right.

No, you're wrong. Clapper and Yates just testified under oath in front of Senators, of whom knows most of the laws about this stuff and had Yates and Clapper lied, they would have been called out on it, right then and there. In fact, Cruz tried to get Yates in a "gotcha" moment and she handed his ass to him.

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

Which again demands the question: why is she testifying when she can't testify of jack?

...she was invited for the purpose of getting it on the record that she warned Trump's team about Flynn and Trump didn't do anything about it for 18 days.

lol You got it all wrong. She was being investigated today.

 

[Lewdog]

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

You don't know that... and the Senator's today were asking if there is some kind of way that it is recorded who requests and unmasks Americans in situations like Flynn's. Jesus dude, you think you know more than the Ex head of the DNI, acting AG, and U.S. Senators? That might be the funniest thing I've read all day.

What I said is pretty much what Clapper said today.

You're so lost I doubt you know what planet you are on. Are you from one of those states weed is legal?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

What?
Going down for what?
She's already testified that she obtained that information through the FBI investigation of Flynn. She was asked multiple times if she ever requested unmasking. She responded, no.

When some one is unmasked only the person who requested it is given the name, so either she requested it or she knows who did, and passing that piece of classified information is a crime, so if she is not lying to Congress about requesting it, she knows who did and by not reporting them, she is complicit in their crime.

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

SHE WAS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Of course she had access to all of the investigative findings including details about Flynn. She didn't have to unmask anything, dope.

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol No, I am exactly right.

No, you're wrong. Clapper and Yates just testified under oath in front of Senators, of whom knows most of the laws about this stuff and had Yates and Clapper lied, they would have been called out on it, right then and there. In fact, Cruz tried to get Yates in a "gotcha" moment and she handed his ass to him.

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Yes he did lie to the FBI. WTF you think they brought it up?

No, he didn't. What brought it all up was Yates' bizarre claim that Flynn could be blackmailed by the Russians because he didn't report the conversation with the Russian ambassador. This is just another part of Obama's Russia hoax.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

When some one is unmasked only the person who requested it is given the name, so either she requested it or she knows who did, and passing that piece of classified information is a crime, so if she is not lying to Congress about requesting it, she knows who did and by not reporting them, she is complicit in their crime.

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

You don't know that... and the Senator's today were asking if there is some kind of way that it is recorded who requests and unmasks Americans in situations like Flynn's. Jesus dude, you think you know more than the Ex head of the DNI, acting AG, and U.S. Senators? That might be the funniest thing I've read all day.

Jesus dude, you think you know more than the Ex head of the DNI, acting AG, and U.S. Senators? That might be the funniest thing I've read all day.

They all do that.

 

[deanrd]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

She did an unintentional number on Ted Cruz.

 

[Rustic]

There is no Russian connection, this is a big nothing burger... again
Lol

 

[Lewdog]

No, you're wrong. Clapper and Yates just testified under oath in front of Senators, of whom knows most of the laws about this stuff and had Yates and Clapper lied, they would have been called out on it, right then and there. In fact, Cruz tried to get Yates in a "gotcha" moment and she handed his ass to him.

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Yes he did lie to the FBI. WTF you think they brought it up?

No, he didn't. What brought it all up was Yates' bizarre claim that Flynn could be blackmailed by the Russians because he didn't report the conversation with the Russian ambassador. This is just another part of Obama's Russia hoax.

Ok, you just proved you don't know wtf you are talking about.

The argument was that he could be blackmailed because Russia had record he talked to the Russians... and Flynn lied to the FBI and Trump's team including Pence and said he had no contact with the Russians during the election...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Graham: How did you know that Gen Flynn was talking to the Russians? Yates: I can't reveal that in an open setting.

Then what is the point of her testifying if she cannot provide answers?

She provided the answers to Flynn and the admin's malfeasance.

 

[Bush92]

She knows the who, what, when, and where of the Flynns, et al, but the Trumpkins would not listen.

Now the world gets to listen.

Sally Yates to testify at May 8 Senate hearing "Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates is set to testify May 8 before a Senate judiciary investigation into Russia's interference in last year's elections, her second congressional hearing at which she's scheduled to testify within the span of a week. "

Mod Edit -- No links to other message forums. JakeStarkey
Sally Yates Testimony to Shine Public Light on Russia Probes "Monday testimony from Sally Yates, former acting attorney general, is expected to be a compelling public moment in the so-far largely secretive investigations "

Who is "alt right" and what are they running from? Trump violated what ethics law? So General Flynn is a lying sack of shit. He lied to Trump White House. So...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Good lord, if you are going to make comments you need to watch and pay attention to this shit. You are wrong.

lol No, I am exactly right.

No, you're wrong. Clapper and Yates just testified under oath in front of Senators, of whom knows most of the laws about this stuff and had Yates and Clapper lied, they would have been called out on it, right then and there. In fact, Cruz tried to get Yates in a "gotcha" moment and she handed his ass to him.

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Not at all, kid.

When good Dems and Pubs are elected, new libel laws will be passed federal and state.

And those, like you, who tell lies to deliberately obfuscate public knowledge of events will be punished and fined exorbitantly.

 

[toomuchtime_]

When some one is unmasked only the person who requested it is given the name, so either she requested it or she knows who did, and passing that piece of classified information is a crime, so if she is not lying to Congress about requesting it, she knows who did and by not reporting them, she is complicit in their crime.

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

SHE WAS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Of course she had access to all of the investigative findings including details about Flynn. She didn't have to unmask anything, dope.

No one, including the DNI, has access to NSA intercepts without formally requesting it and no one has the right to pass that information along. If you had taken your head out of your ass long enough to pay attention today, you would have heard Clapper explaining this and his testimony that even he had to formally request access to NSA files and had never discussed them with anyone but his deputy and general counsel, and then only when necessary. The AG has no right to access NSA files without receiving permission after formally requesting access and since she testified she never had, she had no right to that information.

 

[Lewdog]

No, she just testified that she NEVER requested for anyone's name to be unmasked, let alone Flynn's.

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

SHE WAS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Of course she had access to all of the investigative findings including details about Flynn. She didn't have to unmask anything, dope.

No one, including the DNI, has access to NSA intercepts without formally requesting it and no one has the right to pass that information along. If you had taken your head out of your ass long enough to pay attention today, you would have heard Clapper explaining this and his testimony that even he had to formally request access to NSA files and had never discussed them with anyone but his deputy and general counsel, and then only when necessary. The AG has no right to access NSA files without receiving permission after formally requesting access and since she testified she never had, she had no right to that information.

Flynn wasn't found by the NSA... he was found out by recordings of foreign agents by the CIA.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Yates refused to answer questions about where the information came from or what was in it, claiming it was too classified to speak of in public, but she was bit shy about trying to use it to support Obama's Russia hoax.

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Yes he did lie to the FBI. WTF you think they brought it up?

No, he didn't. What brought it all up was Yates' bizarre claim that Flynn could be blackmailed by the Russians because he didn't report the conversation with the Russian ambassador. This is just another part of Obama's Russia hoax.

Ok, you just proved you don't know wtf you are talking about.

The argument was that he could be blackmailed because Russia had record he talked to the Russians... and Flynn lied to the FBI and Trump's team including Pence and said he had no contact with the Russians during the election...

No one claimed Flynn lied to the FBI. Yates claimed he could be blackmailed because he had lied to Pence. You are having a hard believing this because her explanation is so bizarre.

 

[JakeStarkey]

tmt is deliberately lying in order to obfuscate publicly the investigation. Those who support him are deliberately lying. The laws will be changed to punish those crimes.

 

[toomuchtime_]

If she is not lying, then she knows who did and that person committed a crime by giving the information to her; either way she committed a crime.

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

SHE WAS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Of course she had access to all of the investigative findings including details about Flynn. She didn't have to unmask anything, dope.

No one, including the DNI, has access to NSA intercepts without formally requesting it and no one has the right to pass that information along. If you had taken your head out of your ass long enough to pay attention today, you would have heard Clapper explaining this and his testimony that even he had to formally request access to NSA files and had never discussed them with anyone but his deputy and general counsel, and then only when necessary. The AG has no right to access NSA files without receiving permission after formally requesting access and since she testified she never had, she had no right to that information.

Flynn wasn't found by the NSA... he was found out by recordings of foreign agents by the CIA.

Wrong again. It was the NSA that intercepted the conversation.

 

[Lewdog]

She can't restify on it because it is still part of an ongoing investigation... which is what Comey already said last week. She did say that Flynn lying to the FBI could be a criminal offense... so there's that, so another reason she couldn't talk about it.

More nonsense. Flynn didn't lie to the FBI, he lied to Pence. You don't get it, the investigation is no longer about collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it is about crimes that may have been committed by members of the Obama administration, such as Yates, to try to support Obama's Russia hoax. What Flynn did was not the subject of today's testimony, Yates' actions were the subject.

Yes he did lie to the FBI. WTF you think they brought it up?

No, he didn't. What brought it all up was Yates' bizarre claim that Flynn could be blackmailed by the Russians because he didn't report the conversation with the Russian ambassador. This is just another part of Obama's Russia hoax.

Ok, you just proved you don't know wtf you are talking about.

The argument was that he could be blackmailed because Russia had record he talked to the Russians... and Flynn lied to the FBI and Trump's team including Pence and said he had no contact with the Russians during the election...

No one claimed Flynn lied to the FBI. Yates claimed he could be blackmailed because he had lied to Pence. You are having a hard believing this because her explanation is so bizarre.

For Christ's sakes... do you fucking pay attention? Flynn lied to the FBI.

Flynn in FBI interview denied discussing sanctions with Russian ambassador

 

[Lewdog]

You are truly dopey.

Maybe you are too young to remember all the safeguards put in place after the reforms to the intelligence services following 911, but absolutely no one has the right to know the identities of Americans caught on intercepts of foreigners without formally requesting it and that person has no right to pass that information along without a FISA court order. None was ever obtained on Flynn, so some one broke the law and Yates had to know who it was when she received the information.

SHE WAS THE ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL!
Of course she had access to all of the investigative findings including details about Flynn. She didn't have to unmask anything, dope.

No one, including the DNI, has access to NSA intercepts without formally requesting it and no one has the right to pass that information along. If you had taken your head out of your ass long enough to pay attention today, you would have heard Clapper explaining this and his testimony that even he had to formally request access to NSA files and had never discussed them with anyone but his deputy and general counsel, and then only when necessary. The AG has no right to access NSA files without receiving permission after formally requesting access and since she testified she never had, she had no right to that information.

Flynn wasn't found by the NSA... he was found out by recordings of foreign agents by the CIA.

Wrong again. It was the NSA that intercepted the conversation.

The CIA is the one that deals with foreign intelligence... I think you have gone beyond three strikes in this thread. You are definitely out.