percysunshine
Diamond Member
Much ado about nothing that actually matters, unless one considers it to be in our interest to control the outcome of everything everywhere.
As the body count goes up, just keep telling yourself that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Much ado about nothing that actually matters, unless one considers it to be in our interest to control the outcome of everything everywhere.
Here's my opinion.
We have larger problems at home, like the NSA and the NDAA and Obamacare and Gun Grabbing.
Burying our heads in the sand did not work in the 30's and it won't work now. a renewed aggressive Russia is a direct threat to our nation and our stability. If Russia seizes Ukraine and no one acts they will be free to seize other nations that broke away from the old Soviet Union. And THAT will lead to war.
Yeah, you're probably right. I mean, it would have been nice to have the Ukraine as a big-ass buffer-state, friendly to the West, and eventually integrated into the European Union, NATO, etc., to ensure for generations to come that Russia could not threaten and absorb and pseudo-enslave eastern (or all?) of Europe, and it would have been nice to have had the foresight to help the Ukraine avoid its usurpation and subversion by more directly engaging with it on the political and economic fronts, and it would have been nice to manifest some better sort of backbone as a response to this invasion of a potentially friendly and highly valuable partner on the world stage, but... what the hell... nothing that actually matters, I guess.Much ado about nothing that actually matters, unless one considers it to be in our interest to control the outcome of everything everywhere.
Right now CNN TV just reported Russia parliament has requested the return of their US embassador
-Geaux
Euphemisms abound; War is a 'Kenetic Military Action', and invasion is an 'Uncontested Arrival'.
Orwell was right.
U.S. assessment of Crimea: This isn?t an invasion, it?s an ? ?uncontested arrival? « Hot Air
Euphemisms abound; War is a 'Kenetic Military Action', and invasion is an 'Uncontested Arrival'.
Orwell was right.
U.S. assessment of Crimea: This isn?t an invasion, it?s an ? ?uncontested arrival? « Hot Air
Admin officials tell CNN's Barbara Starr this is an "uncontested arrival" not necessarily "an invasion" and that this distinction is "key."
2:13 PM - 28 Feb 2014
not as catchy as "overseas contingency operations", but they'll work on it I am sure.
heres the thing, the Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych was elected with 53% of the vote in a closely watched/internationally monitored election, pronounced by one and all as the cleanest election in any former soviet republic.
So, no matter what side you come down on, the protestors or Yanukovychs, his being chased from office was a coup, which begs the question- why is Obama spptting this?
Ponder this; Putin is taking actions to secure Russian citizens in an area of a country (58% Russian) which is in upheaval, obama is sppting an overthrow, those are the facts. As far as Putin trying to bribe Ukraine to not take a EU deal etc. so what,? We have done it, we do it , we use money and trade deals as leverage all the time.
Which will be more tempting?
Start World War III and resolve the unemployment problem/get the economy in gear?
A golf course in Hawaii?
Much ado about nothing that actually matters, unless one considers it to be in our interest to control the outcome of everything everywhere.
As the body count goes up, just keep telling yourself that.
Obama is praying for another professional athlete to come out of the closet so the news can cover that instead.
Fair enough.Which will be more tempting?
Start World War III and resolve the unemployment problem/get the economy in gear?
A golf course in Hawaii?
I'd vote for the war if only keyboard warriors were hunted down and made to go first.
Euphemisms abound; War is a 'Kenetic Military Action', and invasion is an 'Uncontested Arrival'.
Orwell was right.
U.S. assessment of Crimea: This isn?t an invasion, it?s an ? ?uncontested arrival? « Hot Air
Admin officials tell CNN's Barbara Starr this is an "uncontested arrival" not necessarily "an invasion" and that this distinction is "key."
2:13 PM - 28 Feb 2014
not as catchy as "overseas contingency operations", but they'll work on it I am sure.
heres the thing, the Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych was elected with 53% of the vote in a closely watched/internationally monitored election, pronounced by one and all as the cleanest election in any former soviet republic.
So, no matter what side you come down on, the protestors or Yanukovychs, his being chased from office was a coup, which begs the question- why is Obama spptting this?
Ponder this; Putin is taking actions to secure Russian citizens in an area of a country (58% Russian) which is in upheaval, obama is sppting an overthrow, those are the facts. As far as Putin trying to bribe Ukraine to not take a EU deal etc. so what,? We have done it, we do it , we use money and trade deals as leverage all the time.
Obama is not supporting anything. Not really.
Putins claim of ethnicity trumping sovereignty is convenient for the Ukraine, but not so much for the Caucasus.
Here's my opinion.
We have larger problems at home, like the NSA and the NDAA and Obamacare and Gun Grabbing.
It is easy. Obama not only supporting this coup, he organise it, to make another Syria with terrorists (neo Naciz) on tje Russian border to involve Russia to bloody war. Why? To make Russia weaker. But in the nearest future such approach of your government to the global politics can give to normal americans big problrems all over the world.Admin officials tell CNN's Barbara Starr this is an "uncontested arrival" not necessarily "an invasion" and that this distinction is "key."
2:13 PM - 28 Feb 2014
not as catchy as "overseas contingency operations", but they'll work on it I am sure.
heres the thing, the Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovych was elected with 53% of the vote in a closely watched/internationally monitored election, pronounced by one and all as the cleanest election in any former soviet republic.
So, no matter what side you come down on, the protestors or Yanukovychs, his being chased from office was a coup, which begs the question- why is Obama spptting this?
Ponder this; Putin is taking actions to secure Russian citizens in an area of a country (58% Russian) which is in upheaval, obama is sppting an overthrow, those are the facts. As far as Putin trying to bribe Ukraine to not take a EU deal etc. so what,? We have done it, we do it , we use money and trade deals as leverage all the time.
Obama is not supporting anything. Not really.
Putins claim of ethnicity trumping sovereignty is convenient for the Ukraine, but not so much for the Caucasus.
We supported EU sweetening the deal and the IMF's stepping up inducements to lure Ukraine into the EU orbit, he warned Yanukovych not to use force and go along with the opposition who were rioting in obection to a deal Yanukovych would sign with Russia.
I have not heard obama denounce the forced change of gov. anywhere.
What Obama should do is let the EU handle it
What Obama should do is let the EU handle it