Did you not read the link in the OP? Rush's ad revenue is back up to pre-Fluke levels. It is HE that is considering severing his relationship with Cumulus. Spin that however you like, but that's the facts, Jack.
I did read the OP, and we did this before. No I don't see where the guy says ad revenue is up to pre-Fluke levels; I do see where he says they've "bounced back" and are "doing very well", and as I pointed out way way back in this thread, the guy talking is "Premiere Radio senior vice president and director of talk radio sales Dan Metter" -- the guy who
sells the program,
addressing his potential buyers. Of course he's going to spin it positively. I might add, when he says they're doing well, he's just mentioned Hannity and George Noori and Randi Rhodes; the collective. He's not talking Limbaugh at that point. He's talking "we" (meaning Premier, the whole roster of talkers).
(Is this what you meant by "did I read the OP", Foxy?)
And the same article also says that Cumulus, as we've also noted here, says they've been losing on Limbaugh. Neither one of course gives figures, nor would we expect them to. But no, I don't see that evidence in there. Spin is spin and specifics are absent.
As far as Limbaugh taking his ball and going home he can bluster whatever he likes but the fact remains, Premiere draws up the contracts with stations, not him. That's what a syndicator does. If a baseball pitcher declares he's not going to the bullpen, and the manager sends him there, guess what-- he's going to the bullpen whether he likes it or not.
I think what's needed here, Ernie, is a healthy skepticism. I've got lots extra here if you want it.