Rush: BHO channeled seized assets to LW groups/Community Organizers

[WillMunny]

"Community organizer" is simply the PC term for "riot inciter," pure and simple.

"Shit stirrer."

You've noticed (as I have) that Obamaggot's entire objective is to get various different groups of people highly pissed off at each other. His pompous autobiographies somewhat admitted as much, with all the racial paranoia against whites he spewed in his books. The paranoid tone of his writings was basically, "No matter how smiling and friendly whites were, I knew they were secretly hiding something from me."

 

[BULLDOG]

Limbaugh makes shit up. You didn't know that?

True. You should see what Forbes has to say about it.

Judiciary Chair Claims Internal Docs Reveal Obama DOJ 'Slush Fund'

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right-wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

If you say so. Did you think Forbes was endorsing Goodlatte's statement? What part of the article led you to believe that?

I didn't read more than the headline and skimmed enough to know it supported my position and I just did what Libs do.

I used it as a stick to beat the Left with.

But Libs are allergic to facts and truth. So when they reach out to corroborate one of their positions they find thin scratchings and so they just recycle the insults thrown at them by RW'ers.

So you admit that your link doesn't prove anything about any imagined slush fund, but you didn't care anyway. Typical right winger.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Limbaugh makes shit up. You didn't know that?

True. You should see what Forbes has to say about it.

Judiciary Chair Claims Internal Docs Reveal Obama DOJ 'Slush Fund'

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Limbaugh makes shit up. You didn't know that?

True. You should see what Forbes has to say about it.

Judiciary Chair Claims Internal Docs Reveal Obama DOJ 'Slush Fund'

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

 

[WillMunny]

True. You should see what Forbes has to say about it.

Judiciary Chair Claims Internal Docs Reveal Obama DOJ 'Slush Fund'

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

True. You should see what Forbes has to say about it.

Judiciary Chair Claims Internal Docs Reveal Obama DOJ 'Slush Fund'

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

 

[BULLDOG]

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

 

[Deno]

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

 

[leecross]

Limbaugh makes shit up. You didn't know that?

And if you would make the claim that because he makes up stuff sometimes, that he should be ignored or disbelieved or criticized routinely, are you going to be a hypocrite and deny that Muslims should be routinely ostracized because they sometimes perform peaceful Jihad?

 

[Marion Morrison]

Rush is right...of center. And fat, and oogly.

I can stand to listen to him every now and then..in small doses.

He's not so bad.

That smug jackass Hannity, I cannot stand.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic, and sexual perverts.

 

[BULLDOG]

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

You would be a lot more credible if you bounced up and down like Rush does while you say that. Those flopping jowls are so believable.

 

[leecross]

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic and sexual perverts.

You sound like a sour grapes kind of guy.

 

[BULLDOG]

Limbaugh makes shit up. You didn't know that?

And if you would make the claim that because he makes up stuff sometimes, that he should be ignored or disbelieved or criticized routinely, are you going to be a hypocrite and deny that Muslims should be routinely ostracized because they sometimes perform peaceful Jihad?

 

[Wry Catcher]

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

I read that. Forbes is only reporting that Goodlatte made that claim. They aren't saying it is true. Right wing politicians like Goodlatte aren't any more believable than Limbaugh.

It could make someone appear like a loony Liberal to continually deny truths.

Your psyche will have holes in it like Swiss cheese.

Sent from my LG-M154 using Tapatalk

The Limbaugh allegation is the beginning of a BIG LIE, the food which provides energy to the right wing. I will stand correct on this single issue when there is probative evidence to support the claim beyond a reasonable doubt.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

President Obama has never been indicted, President Clinton was impeached and acquitted, Sect. Clinton has been investigated for decades, alone with her husband, and they have never been indicted.

I will believe it when you post evidence which tends to prove they are culpable of criminality. Post what they did, when, and what statute they violated. Since you are so sure of your claim, you must have the evidence and will post it in the next few minutes.

If not, you are a damn liar.

You have to 4:26 PST, on this thread.

 

[BULLDOG]

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic, and sexual perverts.

And fat. Don't forget they are both fat.

 

[Deno]

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic, and sexual perverts.

What a Hoot coming from a pervert loving leftard.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic and sexual perverts.

You sound like a sour grapes kind of guy.

It's my wry sense of humor.

 

[Deno]

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

See if the footnotes are bogus, okay?

Wouldn't want to slip false information into the evidence chain.

Does Obama stand to be in big legal trouble if Trump is not ‘taken down'?

Yes.
From, “The Russia Hoax”
Staffers at the State Department and the White House, including President Obama, regularly communicated with the secretary of state at her private email address.7
Documents uncovered by the FBI show that Obama used a pseudonym in communicating with Clinton on her private email account.8
Sometimes he did so while his secretary of state was overseas using an unprotected mobile device.
When the FBI showed a copy of one such Obama email to Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, she exclaimed, “How is that not classified?”9
Indeed, it surely was classified.
Thereafter, the White House refused to disclose the contents of any of the president’s emails involving his fake name.
Obama was not only concealing his communications with an alias, he was mishandling classified information in the same negligent manner as Clinton.
This may explain why the FBI and the DOJ were motivated not to charge Clinton.
If they did so, Obama’s mishandling of classified communications would be exposed.
It is hard to imagine that the president and others never noticed that Clinton was using a nongovernment, nonsecure private account. Indeed, emails prove that many of them did know.10
But the secretary of state was surrounded by long-time Clinton cronies.
They shielded her.

They were not about to challenge the person they were certain would become the next president of the United States.

Footnotes

8. Evelyn Rupert, “Obama Used Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton,” The Hill, September 23, 2016; Josh Gerstein and Nolan D. McCaskill, “Obama Used a Pseudonym in Emails with Clinton, FBI Documents Reveal,” Politico, September 23, 2016; Daniel Halper, “Obama Used Pseudonym to Talk with Hillary on Private Server,” September 24, 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Chuck Ross, “Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements to FBI,” Daily Caller, December 4, 2017.

11. Report by Office of Inspector General, Department of State, “Office of the Secretary: Evaluation of Email Records Management and Cybersecurity Requirements,” May 25, 2016; Steven Lee Myers and Eric Lichtblau, “Hillary Clinton Is Criticized for Private Emails in State Department Review,” New York Times, May 25, 2016.

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

You would be a lot more credible if you bounced up and down like Rush does while you say that. Those flopping jowls are so believable.

You just don’t like Rush because he

exposes you leftards for the fools

and liars you are…..

 

[Wry Catcher]

It seems willmummy has cut and run:

"President Obama has never been indicted, President Clinton was impeached and acquitted, Sect. Clinton has been investigated for decades, alone with her husband, and they have never been indicted.

"I will believe it when you post evidence which tends to prove they are culpable of criminality. Post what they did, when, and what statute they violated. Since you are so sure of your claim, you must have the evidence and will post it in the next few minutes.

"If not, you are a damn liar.

"You have to 4:26 PST, on this thread."

Above quote from post 33.

 

[Lesh]

I don't like Rush because he'a a hate mongering hypocrite who turns my stomach

 

[Wry Catcher]

Really, you expect me to research these notes?

From what source did you get these notes? Using the Daily Caller as a single source for anything is laughable. Who made the claim that Obama used a nom de plumb?

I write your post off as bogus. One more BIG LIE by those who hate Obama, The Clinton's and the Democratic Party.

The Obamas, Clintons and the Democratic Party have EARNED their hatred for the next thousand years with enough criminality to fill a set of encyclopedias. I don't expect you to believe it, so go ahead and dismiss it.

No problem. The sane world already dismissed your claims long ago.

All of you Tards are insane liars.....

Rush is Right...….

No, Rush is far far right, when it benefits him. Limbaugh is much like Trump, both are narcissistic, and sexual perverts.

What a Hoot coming from a pervert loving leftard.

My dog is better looking than yours, and smarter too.