Ron Paulbarians Are At GOP's Gate...

[Synthaholic]

A third party will get traction when it is led by someone who isn't looked at by a large number of people as your crazy uncle (Perot), doesn't have a questionable past of courting undesirables (Paul), and hasn't been previously smeared by one of the two major Parties (Nader).

It has to be led by someone who has a clean history, with no skeletons.

So.......perfection? Good luck with that. the plebs are already drinking from the nonsense trouth over who ate what meat and who bullied who.

It's not a problem of the conadidates, but of public perceptions. People are worried about all the wrong things and only hear media soundbites.

Not perfection, just a clean record. Is that too much to ask for?

And it is the candidates. Perot did very well until he let the crazy out.

 

[Dr.Drock]

A third party will get traction when it is led by someone who isn't looked at by a large number of people as your crazy uncle (Perot), doesn't have a questionable past of courting undesirables (Paul), and hasn't been previously smeared by one of the two major Parties (Nader).

It has to be led by someone who has a clean history, with no skeletons.

Obviously no one cared about the undesireables that Obama has spent time around.

Nobody dislikes Paul because of who he's "courted", they don't like him because they're told not to like him by their gods (the rep and dem party) and the media.

Not that that means they'd automatically like him if they weren't told to.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

I love it.

So Paul supporters take the delegates in Maine, Nevada, Iowa, Washington, Louisiana, Arizona, Missouri, Mass, Colorado, Minnesota and Hawaii. Yet we're still marginal?

Here's a reality and fact check for you blow hards.

Reality Check: All Republican Delegates Are "Free Agents" and Unbound? - YouTube

The truth has got to hurt them with this post. They also ignore the facts that Romney everywhere he goes,his audiences are only in the dozens or so in stadiums,where Paul will go to that same stadium and will draw THOUSANDS .

Here is what I was talking about earlier.sometimes a picture speaks a thousand words.

Ron Paul gets crowd and Mitt gets empty stadium in Michigan

The same kind of turnout is happening for Obama as well around the country. Thank god not all americans are idiots like Toto and so many others here and are awake and understand both parties are corrupt except for Paul in the fact he is a RINO.

Here is what I was talking about earlier.Just like Romneys camp,Obamas supporters are not turning out in droves to support him and just like they had to do with Romney,they move the crowds down from the seats onto the floor to make it appear that Obama has larger crowds than what he has. sometimes a picture speaks a thousand words.

Barack Obama launched his campaign in unspectacular fashion today at Ohio State University, the largest college in the crucial swing state. A photo posted to twitter by Mitt Romney's campaign spokesman Ryan Williams reveals sparse attendance. The above image, according to Williams, was taken during the President's first official campaign speech.
During the speech, Obama ripped into the presumptive GOP nominee and discussed nation building at home, but the most newsworthy item of the day was not the talking points Obama delivered: it was the crowd... or lack thereof. According to ABC News, the Obama campaign had expected an "overflow" of people. Instead, the arena looked half-empty. The Columbus Dispatch reports that Obama organizers even had people move from the seats to the floor of the gym in order to project a larger crowd on television.

According to the Toledo Blade, the venue for Obama's rally seats 20,000 but "there were a lot of empty seats." Comparatively, Obama drew a crowd of 35,000 at Ohio State when he campaigned for former Governor Ted Strickland in 2010.

The official Barack Obama Tumblr boasts a figure from ThinkProgress that 14,000 attended the event--70% of the stadium's seating capacity.

It's a campaign faux pas to hold an event in a room that isn't full; to promise the media a more-than-capacity crowd then fall this far short of that promise is utter incompetence. In 2008, Obama ran a near-flawless campaign, buoyed by enthusiasm and effective organizing. But it's not 2008 any more, and on day one of the 2012 campaign, Team Obama has already made an embarrassing blunder.

Alexander Marlow is Breitbart News Managing Editor. Follow him on twitter @alexmarlow.



Obama Launches Campaign in Empty Arena

 

[LA RAM FAN]

so much for the nonsense and ramblings that paul has dropped out.

Ron Paul 2012 Official Campaign WebsiteRon Paul 2012 Presidential Campaign Committee

 

[SFC Ollie]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

 

[Contumacious]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

So our "only choice" is to rollover and play dead. We have no choice but to accept tyranny by the majority.


The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

Edmund Burke

.

 

[Dr.Drock]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

I'd give anything to have someone in office who slowed down what the status quo reps and dems are doing to this country.

Someone who finally said no, someone who wouldn't sign on to their bs.

 

[Contumacious]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

And the country is not "divided" , when you have over 85% of voters approving a candidate who promises to support the welfare/warfare state.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

 

[SFC Ollie]

You have much to learn...........

 

[TakeAStepBack]

No, actually. I dont'. unless the lesson plan is big government nanny state and warfare state 101.

Constitutionally, he needs no one to give the OK to close down military installments and bring troops home.

 

[Dr.Drock]

No, actually. I dont'. unless the lesson plan is big government nanny state and warfare state 101.

Constitutionally, he needs no one to give the OK to close down military installments and bring troops home.

I think what he meant by "much to learn" was you need to be programmed to believe we need a lot of warmongering in order to be safe.

The only way to keep people from hating us, is by dropping bombs on their families and friends heads.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

yeah, that's it. that's why intelligence insiders agree with paul that we're creating our own enemies with our disasterous foreign policy.

So it's not about learning, it's about goose stepping and being indoctrinated into "the club".

 

[The Rabbi]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

He would need Congressional authority for the trip to sign the surrender documents.

And it could happen. Paul's plan for victory has been revealed here:
Step 1-Lose every primary
Step 2-Quit campaigning
Step 3-?
Step 4-Victory!

 

[The Rabbi]

yeah, that's it. that's why intelligence insiders agree with paul that we're creating our own enemies with our disasterous foreign policy.

So it's not about learning, it's about goose stepping and being indoctrinated into "the club".

Yes, American imperialism is creating enemies. Fidel Castro agrees with you!

 

[Dr.Drock]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

He would need Congressional authority for the trip to sign the surrender documents.

And it could happen. Paul's plan for victory has been revealed here:
Step 1-Lose every primary
Step 2-Quit campaigning
Step 3-?
Step 4-Victory!

Your party and their look alike party are already in the process of surrendering to the Taliban, just basic common sense shows Paul's plan in Afghanistan would've been roughly 26871756737687538 times better than the Bush/Obama plan.

 

[The Rabbi]

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

He would need Congressional authority for the trip to sign the surrender documents.

And it could happen. Paul's plan for victory has been revealed here:
Step 1-Lose every primary
Step 2-Quit campaigning
Step 3-?
Step 4-Victory!

Your party and their look alike party are already in the process of surrendering to the Taliban, just basic common sense shows Paul's plan in Afghanistan would've been roughly 26871756737687538 times better than the Bush/Obama plan.

Paul's plan for Afghanistan was?
Oh yeah, nothing. He would decry world terrorism and blame the U.S.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

I cant believe people here are listening to anything this troll Gomer Pyle Ollie says.

 

[SFC Ollie]

What would a Ron Paul Presidency do?

Not a damned thing...........

The Republicans would stop him on 99% of his foreign policy.

And the Democrats would shut him down on his domestic Policies.

The country would be even more divided than it is now. If you can imagine that.........

Wrong. Commander in Chief. He needs no blessing from congress or anyone else to end foreign occupations/wars and close down military installments. if that's all we got, it's far more than anything we've gotten in the last 40 years.

I cant believe people here are listening to anything this troll Gomer Pyle Ollie says.

Yep I'm a troll whenever i disagree with you. LOL go back to the conspiracy threads........

 

[Avatar4321]

So Paul isnt going to spend any more money campaigning, but he's at the gates?