Classic.
They're all lucky they're not working in China now.
I believe Romney showed both humility and class when he asked his supporters to join him in praying for the President.
Thanks for showing the other side, and I hope you will also consider both sides.
I guess you didn't see
my post on election night.
I would not want to be judged for only the good or bad decisions I make, but be seen as equal as anyone else by looking at both sides in context, where they balance out. I would hope the good outweighs the bad, and with Romney, I have been told by those who encountered him personally he is a good man and so are his supporters.
I think there are two Mitts, which he compartmentalizes. The "Personal Mitt" who is a good family man, who cares about his friends and his "church", and who would shut down his business to let everyone go out and search for a co-worker's missing daughter.
Then there is "Business Mitt", who would put 20 families - whom he doesn't know (and that's the important part) - out on the street if it meant an extra $10,000 in his pocket.
So, no. I don't consider him a "good man".
As for Obama, I would like to see what happens, given the $15 million from BofA he borrowed for his campaign, while a national historic landmark that needs millions to be raised by Democratic supporters could be lost for lack of funds.
What's the relevance between him borrowing campaign money from a bank, and a national historic landmark needing money?
And why is it the responsibility of Democrats to raise that money?
Obama also turned down $5 million from Trump that could instantly save this national site.
He hasn't turned down $5 million from Trump. What is keeping Trump from just donating the money?
And where is your anger at Trump for not just donating it? He claims to be a multi-billionaire.
Why should there be strings attached to a charitable donation?
Do you tell your church
"I'll donate money for the new music building at the church if you let me bring home some of the instruments and speakers whenever I want to"?
So if Obama and the Democrats don't have money themselves to save the only historic district in the nation of Black churches built by Freed Slaves, as a Civil Rights landmark, I hope there is equal humility and class in working with Republicans if that is where the money could come from.
We'll see if campaign spending is more important than saving a national landmark to Civil Rights and Freed Slave history.
Oh, so since this landmark is connected to slavery, the Democrats should raise the money? Republicans are only interested in saving landmarks that are in line with their ideology?
I'm starting to see why dumbass daveman thanked your post.
And if trickle down works or fails, and if the Democrat Party really defends the interests of the constituents who elect them every year without fail.
We'll see. And for the sake of the nation's history and economy, I hope it's not too late.
We've been waiting over 30 years for trickle down to work. It doesn't. It never has.
It's a failed economic policy, borne of a failed ideology that was soundly rejected by America on Tuesday.
He just won because he ran a better campaign and imo there are more cradle to grave Democrats who will vote for anyone with a D after their name. The GOP has lifelong party loyalists but I don't believe to the same degree.
