He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.
"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."
Roger Stone asks for new trial
All the jurors were leftwingers. The judge blocked every attempt by the defense to get a fair jury. That needs to be looked at as well. The judge should be investigated. She's obviously an Obama hack.
I've posted a link as to how jury's are selected, and I'll post it again.
Jury Selection in Criminal Cases
Each side has several opportunities to strike potential jurors without stating a cause and every opportunity to strike a potential juror for cause.
There has to be a transcript of the trial. Stone's lawyers obviously will use it in preparing his appeal to point out flaws in the trial, citing portions of the transcript. Claims of bias against Stone are very premature. Let's see what his lawyers come up with.
I see that some people are claiming that Stone was wrongly convicted and was innocent of the charges against him of lying to Congress, witness tampering, and obstructing a Congressional investigation. I wonder where they are getting their information. Are they privy to some secret information?