Roger Stone asks for a new trial

He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial
STACKED JURY: The Kangaroo Court Against Roger Stone Must End

How was the jury somehow stacked in this case?
Read about how jury members are selected and other potential jurors rejected:
Jury Selection in Criminal Cases
 
William Barr was on TV last night saying that the Stone Trial was a righteous prosecution, of criminal behaviour by the accused and he agrees with the charges filed, and the verdict rendered by the Jury.

Roger Stone is an asshole who committed 7 felonies. He was indicted by a Grand Jury, he was represented by competent attorneys who knew well who the jury foreman was when the accepted her as a juror. They were not lied to or deceived in any way.

There will be no mistrail, and Roger Stone will be shipped off to jail at sentencing, in accordance with the law, and the sentencing guidlines.

William Barr said so.
He did. The fact is he was guilty.

The power of the MSM's propoaganda never ceases to amaze me.
Hitler would have been king of the world with this power,



Trump doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

or he does and he’s lying through his teeth.

He does know what he's talking about.
 
He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial
STACKED JURY: The Kangaroo Court Against Roger Stone Must End

How was the jury somehow stacked in this case?
Read about how jury members are selected and other potential jurors rejected:
Jury Selection in Criminal Cases
The trial was in the District of Colombia. That's an automatic stacked jury.
 
All the jurors were leftwingers. The judge blocked every attempt by the defense to get a fair jury. That needs to be looked at as well. The judge should be investigated. She's obviously an Obama hack.
Amy Berman Jackson is a clown, same as Sullivan, the Flynn judge.
( a CIA asset there to protect the deep state)

It's looking like some of the House Dems are also.

That's my guess,.
 
I am curious to know why you think Trump is going to lose the 2020 presidential election. Do any of those running Democrats have an actual plan on how to deal with the economy, jobs, national defense, foreign and domestic policy, etc.? Do any of those Democrats really think they can top what President Trump has accomplished?

Or is their only platform "beating Trump"? It just doesn't sound to me like revenge is a very good presidential platform to run on.

Liberals are more than prepared, they are anxious to tank the economy and bring this nation into war, in order to get rid of President Trump. In their view, Peace and Prosperity are vastly overrated.
The economy is running because of liberal policy. So let's leave fact free world. trump is the one who puts us at the greatest risk of war.
the economy is humming b/c liberals are throwing cons in jail?
Well I guess if that's what works for ya
 
Give MSDNC credit......at least they got the headline correct.



I think that President Trump is going to have to do some pardoning and moving on from the Witch Hunt.

Pardon Stone, Papadopolous, Flynn, Manafort and get this whole shit fest into the history books. What can the libs do about it? I guess they could impeach him again, and we can have still another silly trial this year.
 
I think that President Trump is going to have to do some pardoning and moving on from the Witch Hunt.

Pardon Stone, Papadopolous, Flynn, Manafort and get this whole shit fest into the history books. What can the libs do about it? I guess they could impeach him again, and we can have still another silly trial this year.
This Stone and Flynn news has them stirring up more "obstruction" charges.
It never ends.
 
Give MSDNC credit......at least they got the headline correct.



I think that President Trump is going to have to do some pardoning and moving on from the Witch Hunt.

Pardon Stone, Papadopolous, Flynn, Manafort and get this whole shit fest into the history books. What can the libs do about it? I guess they could impeach him again, and we can have still another silly trial this year.

This Stone and Flynn news has them stirring up more "obstruction" charges.
It never ends.



The Fake Trials of Flynn and Stone are really important to the Libs. Their hope is to intimidate Americans who might want to work for President Trump or other conservatives in the future. The Flynn and Stone trials sends a message that they are willing to go to any extreme to force their program of socialism/tyranny and that their victory is inevitable.
 
I want to know what the big cover-up is. There's a very strong reason why even Lindsey Graham and the Republicans
are coddling along the myth that Russia hacked the DNC. Personally, I think it ties Seth Rich to a sloppy inside hit job, and then there's Joseph Mifsud who's still missing and assumed dead.

We know they tried to frame Pappy.

Do Brennan, Clapper and Comey have the blackmail power to get out of this ?
It looks that way.

 
He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial
All the jurors were leftwingers. The judge blocked every attempt by the defense to get a fair jury. That needs to be looked at as well. The judge should be investigated. She's obviously an Obama hack.

I've posted a link as to how jury's are selected, and I'll post it again.
Jury Selection in Criminal Cases
Each side has several opportunities to strike potential jurors without stating a cause and every opportunity to strike a potential juror for cause.

There has to be a transcript of the trial. Stone's lawyers obviously will use it in preparing his appeal to point out flaws in the trial, citing portions of the transcript. Claims of bias against Stone are very premature. Let's see what his lawyers come up with.

I see that some people are claiming that Stone was wrongly convicted and was innocent of the charges against him of lying to Congress, witness tampering, and obstructing a Congressional investigation. I wonder where they are getting their information. Are they privy to some secret information?
 
I see that some people are claiming that Stone was wrongly convicted and was innocent of the charges against him of lying to Congress, witness tampering, and obstructing a Congressional investigation. I wonder where they are getting their information. Are they privy to some secret information?
Now you're talking.
Let's just cut all the shit out and
subpoena Julian Assange to testify.

Or will he be deemed mentally unfit from 8 years of solitary confinement ?
 
He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial
All the jurors were leftwingers. The judge blocked every attempt by the defense to get a fair jury. That needs to be looked at as well. The judge should be investigated. She's obviously an Obama hack.

I've posted a link as to how jury's are selected, and I'll post it again.
Jury Selection in Criminal Cases
Each side has several opportunities to strike potential jurors without stating a cause and every opportunity to strike a potential juror for cause.

There has to be a transcript of the trial. Stone's lawyers obviously will use it in preparing his appeal to point out flaws in the trial, citing portions of the transcript. Claims of bias against Stone are very premature. Let's see what his lawyers come up with.

I see that some people are claiming that Stone was wrongly convicted and was innocent of the charges against him of lying to Congress, witness tampering, and obstructing a Congressional investigation. I wonder where they are getting their information. Are they privy to some secret information?

A more puzzling question is why are you Democrats adamant that he spends the rest of his life in jail?

I think I've figured out the answer: It's bad enough that President Trump has made most all of the Obama legacy goo "poof" in a puff of smoke.

And then there was that "impeachment", which turned out to be nothing but an enormous waste of time and money.

But the only indictments from the Mueller investigation? God forbid, no. You must leave those intact as a lasting reminder of that even in utter defeat, you had some small resemblance of victory over that mean old Trump.

It's probably really going to screw you people up inside when Trump does eventually give Roger Stone a full presidential pardon.
 
He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial

Doesn't work that way sunshine.
 
A more puzzling question is why are you Democrats adamant that he spends the rest of his life in jail?

I think I've figured out the answer: It's bad enough that President Trump has made most all of the Obama legacy goo "poof" in a puff of smoke.

And then there was that "impeachment", which turned out to be nothing but an enormous waste of time and money.

But the only indictments from the Mueller investigation? God forbid, no. You must leave those intact as a lasting reminder of that even in utter defeat, you had some small resemblance of victory over that mean old Trump.

It's probably really going to screw you people up inside when Trump does eventually give Roger Stone a full presidential pardon.
I think he will pardon Julian Assange first.

Can you imagine the media hypocrisy to follow ?
 
He was convicted by an Obama judge, the Obama prosecutors, and an Obama-loving lead juror. It's time to straighten out this mess or even dismissed the with prejudice and bias.

"Attorneys for Roger Stone on Friday requested a new trial, just a day after saying they were looking at potential bias by a juror who voted to convict the longtime Trump aide of lying to Congress and witness tampering..."

Roger Stone asks for new trial

Doesn't work that way sunshine.


If Stone's lawyers make a motion for a new trial, and the Trump DOJ doesn't object, there will be a new trial.

Or alternatively, President Trump can just give Stone a Pardon, no questions asked. Like he did with the tremendous veteran, Joe Arpaio, who was wrongfully convicted a few years ago. BTW, that worked out fine, Arpaio has not re-offended since his pardon
 
If Stone's lawyers make a motion for a new trial, and the Trump DOJ doesn't object, there will be a new trial.

Or alternatively, President Trump can just give Stone a Pardon, no questions asked. Like he did with the tremendous veteran, Joe Arpaio, who was wrongfully convicted a few years ago. BTW, that worked out fine, Arpaio has not re-offended since his pardon
Or let it stretch out until after the Durham report, so he can say "See. What have I been saying all along ?" If he overplays his hand now it could just complicate matters. ( like Barr was saying about the Tweets)
 

Forum List

Back
Top