Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[tahuyaman]

Ahh, the venerable old "I claim it on the Internet and that proves I'm an expert!" ploy.

^^^^^^ dip-shit.

 

[tahuyaman]

The idiotic trolls inthis forum are wearing me down. I’ve tried hard not to respond with nothing but insults, but these dip-shits make it difficult.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The idiotic trolls inthis forum are wearing me down. I’ve tried hard not to respond with nothing but insults, but these dip-shits make it difficult.

You have never acknowledge you were wrong once in this thread.

 

[tahuyaman]

It's odd how some people can't grasp the idea of defending principle without it being personal.

That’s exactly what you guys have done. With you guys it’s personal. None of you people should ever get close to being on any jury in any circumstance.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That’s exactly what you guys have done. With you guys it’s personal. None of you people should ever get close to being on any jury in any circumstance.

Wrong your whole complaint is he shouldn't have been there with a firearm and claiming that made him the aggressor.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone. The kid has a hero complex.

"Obvious" in what sense? In the sense that you want to believe that because you want to think badly of him for daring to hinder the rioters?

 

[candycorn]

Almost every argument you made is a red herring...

Translation; you have no counter.

Curfews are not illegal.

Yet you said they were.

When there's a curfew it means you can't go to the park or streets for a stroll.

Kyle was walking up and down the street. Thanks for confirming he was violating the curfew.

 

[tahuyaman]

You have never acknowledge you were wrong once in this thread.

How can an opinion be wrong? My view is just that, my view. I’ve stated facts to support my view though. You haven’t. You back your opinions with more opinion.


You sound like some left far wing loon. You must be an AOC supporter.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The idiotic trolls inthis forum are wearing me down. I’ve tried hard not to respond with nothing but insults, but these dip-shits make it difficult.

You still haven't said how he provoked an altercation.

 

[Cecilie1200]

So an active shooter is not someone who is actively shooting a firearm? How can that be possible?

Perhaps because you're deliberately trying to re-interpret the term to suit yourself, according to the most childish and disingenuous views you can manage.

Here's the DHS definition:

An Active Shooter is an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area; in most cases, active shooters use firearms(s) and there is no pattern or method to their selection of victims.

Context is everything. An active shooter is someone who is actively looking to kill people for the sake of killing them.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Only charges in line with the evidence not just any lesser charge

Rght, the charges have been specified.

 

[Cecilie1200]

That’s exactly what you guys have done. With you guys it’s personal. None of you people should ever get close to being on any jury in any circumstance.

Excuse me, Miss Cleo. If I'm ever interested in having you read my mind and tell me what I'm "really" thinking and feeling, I'll ask you. And I'm sure you'd love to have jury duty dependent on defining principled and rational as "Holds the positions I have decided that you should", but please allow me to be the first to tell you to piss off.

 

[DrLove]

Ahh, the venerable old "I claim it on the Internet and that proves I'm an expert!" ploy.

Tahu is correct.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Beat it ya GD F’n IDIOT

Who is Mark Richards, Kyle Rittenhouse's defense attorney?

Kyle Rittenhouse's defense attorney Mark Richards argued that his client "acted in self-defense". The case will be deliberated by the jury.

www.hitc.com

Still confused about the judge's right side and the judge's left side?

 

[tahuyaman]

"Obvious" in what sense? In the sense that you want to believe that because you want to think badly of him for daring to hinder the rioters?

I have no personal feelings about Rittenhouse. My view is based on facts and common sense.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For the love of Jeebus, someone give the toddinator some attention.

 

[Lisa558]

It’s obvious that Rittenhouse armed himself and went to that riot with the intent of shooting someone. The kid has a hero complex.

What is obvious is that the BLM thugs went to the riot with the intent to set things afire, destroy personal property, and cause millions of dollars of damage.

The only one there with a good heart (albeit a bit naive) was Rittenhouse.

 

[tahuyaman]

You still haven't said how he provoked an altercation.

I have about 20 times. I’m not going to do it any more.

Jeebus.

 

[tahuyaman]

What is obvious is that the BLM thugs went to the riot with the intent to set things afire, destroy personal property, and cause millions of dollars of damage.

The only one there with a good heart (albeit a bit naive) was Rittenhouse.

That’s it. The views of the Rittenhouse fan club is based on an opposition to BLM.

 

[struth]

I have no personal feelings about Rittenhouse. My view is based on facts and common sense.

if your view is correct, can’t the same be said about the demafascist brownshirts that traveled there, i mean they started the riot. So if they traveled there looking for violence as well, and got it…then this is mere mutual combat and the case should be dismissed