Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
No, staying home and minding his own business would have been the right thing.
And once he was there, defending himself was the right thing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, staying home and minding his own business would have been the right thing.
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.And, so anyone who does (assuming you are correct about Kyle playing police office)(you're wrong about that) should lose all rights to self-defense?
Yeah, that is pretty idiotic.
We n
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.
I sure do hope its the last time,,We n
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.
We n
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.
It’s embarrassing and troubling that so many so called conservatives have elevated this troubled teen to hero status.
People in the media like Hannity nearly worshiping this kid is embarrassing.
so you lied and it wasnt for the last time,,It’s embarrassing and troubling that so many so called conservatives have elevated this troubled teen to hero status.
People in the media like Hannity nearly worshiping this kid is embarrassing.
You can help that bu not asking the same dumb question over and over again.I sure do hope its the last time,,
your distorted view of the facts are starting to bore me,,
Which does nothing to mitigate, much less negate, his right to self-defense.No, staying home and minding his own business would have been the right thing.
Where did I lie? Be specificso you lied and it wasnt for the last time,,
You can help that bu not asking the same dumb question over and over again.
The distorted view is the one which elevated a disturbed teenager acting as a vigilante to Icon status
when did he take any law into his own hands to make him a vigilante??You can help that bu not asking the same dumb question over and over again.
The distorted view is the one which elevated a disturbed teenager acting as a vigilante to Icon status
Actually it does, but you’re too clouded with irrational bias to see it.Which does nothing to mitigate, much less negate, his right to self-defense.
when you called him an active shooter,,Where did I lie? Be specific
While in the act of shooting a firearm one is an active shooter. As I dated earlier, there are various types of active shooters.when you called him an active shooter,,
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.
And that provocation (in your warped opinion) is the mere possession of a firearm.We n
once again for the very last time. One loses ability to claim self defense when they provoke an altercation. This is backed by the law.
So, at no time was Kyle Rittenhouse an active shooter when he was attacked. Got it.While in the act of shooting a firearm one is an active shooter. As I dated earlier, there are various types of active shooters.