Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I taught my sons to shoot at an early age and gun safety. They are very responsible gun owners now.

I kept all the firearms locked up when they lived at home. Not because I was afraid they would do something stupid but I was afraid their friends would.

I did the same. I showed my children at a very young age what damage a firearm can do, and they don't fear them, but respect them.

My 18-year-old daughter is an expert. Insane amount of trigger and muzzle discipline. She would have mowed down the Kenosha mob, field stripped the rifle in less than a minute, and got back to the business of death without missing a beat.

Also, she has a passion for cars. Just the other day, she changed the pads and rotors on the sedan....like a pro. And she ain't no Tom Boy either.

Sorry. I have to brag on my kids when opportunity knocks.

 

[Turtlesoup]

I grew up around my grandparents, parents and uncle. They all seemed to think anything dangerous was something I needed to be exposed to early in a safe way.

Guns, a car, alcohol, R rated movies and so on. I was exposed to all of that by age 10. They never treated me as a child even when I was one. That's why I never grew up to be irresponsible.

Especially my uncle. When I was 10 he would let me drink beer, I never actually finished one till I was 20 or so and it was never a big deal to me and I never snuck out to get one. Of course when I was 13 or 14 we watched a movie with a flamethrower and I said I wish I had one and his response was "ok let's build one" so we planned it out, he told me about the operation and physics and presto, I had one.

Here is a pic his girlfriend took when I first test fired it.

Your uncle sounds like he was a very interesting and handy man to have around. We grew up much the same way minus the flame thrower of course---

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So every curfew ever imposed was illegal?

Unless under Marshal Law, yes.

What about capacity limits imposed by the fire Marshall...are those unconstitutional?

No, because the people asked the government for fire protection. The government gets to set the rules.

Moral of the story: DON'T ASK GOVERNMENT FOR ANYTHING

 

[tahuyaman]

The medical kit wasn't in his other hand. It was attached to a strap that went across his body.

Correct. He was carrying a rifle in a ready position while engaged in a violent riot. That’s a provocative act.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Everybody had the right to take down an active shooter, and he was.

He was not,

An active shooter is not one who strictly fires in self defense

 

[tahuyaman]

Unless under Marshal Law, yes.

No, because the people asked the government for fire protection. The government gets to set the rules.

Moral of the story: DON'T ASK GOVERNMENT FOR ANYTHING

Marshall law is not a requirement for a city to establish a curfew.

 

[Penelope]

He was not,

An active shooter is not one who strictly fires in self defense

If anything he was not in defense of anything. Neither the guys was shot carried a gun.

 

[tahuyaman]

He was not,

An active shooter is not one who strictly fires in self defense

An active shooter is someone who is actively shooting a firearm

 

[DrLove]

What the ph uk do you care? This kid would protect you before any of the ones who died and injured would.

He might try to protect me, but he'd probably blow my arm off by accident in the process.

 

[Soupnazi630]

If anything he was not in defense of anything. Neither the guys was shot carried a gun.

Wrong.

HE was in defense of himself and only fired on those who were attacking him.

That is not an active shooter.

 

[tahuyaman]

Correct. He was carrying a rifle in a ready position while engaged in a violent riot. That’s a provocative act.

I’m not sure why some think that’s funny.

 

[Soupnazi630]

An active shooter is someone who is actively shooting a firearm

No it is not. By that stupid logic anyone on a gun range can be violently taken down

 

[Soupnazi630]

I’m not sure why some think that’s funny.

Because it is bullshit and nothing more than a lie to justify rioters attacking ANYONE

 

[tahuyaman]

Yep, on the 4473 form. That is why Black has been indicted.

a. Are you the actual transferee/buyer of the firearm(s) listed on this form and any continuation sheet(s) (ATF Form 5300.9A)? Warning: You are not the actual transferee/buyer if you are acquiring the firearm(s) on behalf of another person. If you are not the actual transferee/buyer, the licensee cannot transfer the firearm(s) to you. Exception: If you are only picking up a repaired
firearm(s) for another person, you are not required to answer 21.a. and may proceed to question 21b.


By the way, that asshole GG who got shot in the arm for pointing that Glock at Kyle should be indicted because he was illegally carrying a firearm with a revoked CWP.

Of course the Democrat DA didn't indict him. Why?

It’s odd how some people post comments as if “Kyle” is their best friend.

 

[progressive hunter]

I’m not sure why some think that’s funny.

then the problem is in you,,

 

[progressive hunter]

It’s odd how some people post comments as if “Kyle” is their best friend.

thats your perception,,

 

[tahuyaman]

No it is not. By that stupid logic anyone on a gun range can be violently taken down

So it’s your view that someone actively shooting a firearm is not an active shooter? Is he then an inactive shooter?

 

[tahuyaman]

Because it is bullshit and nothing more than a lie to justify rioters attacking ANYONE

Where did I lie? Lease be specific.

 

[Soupnazi630]

So it’s your view that someone actively shooting a firearm is not an active shooter? Is he then an inactive shooter?

Active shooter is a recent term used to describe people commiting mass murder usually in a random manner.

It is not my view

It does not describe ANYONE shooting a firearm

 

[Correll]

View attachment 565691

Ah, Men. We are not complex creatures.