Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[RetiredGySgt]

Be specific and cite all the things the Judge did wrong......

So no answer from Drlove they just funnied this post.

 

[DrLove]

Be specific and cite all the things the Judge did wrong......

1. Said that the prosecution couldn't refer to the victims as victims
2. Reserved his ire ONLY for the prosecutor
3. Led a round of applause for a defense witness just because he was a veteran
4. His ringtone is one of the goofiest songs ever written - God Bless the USA by Lee Greenwood
5. Constantly made the entire trial all about HIMSELF
6. Cracked a racist joke about Asian food

That'll do for starters

 

[M14 Shooter]

It doesn't. But I know a punk when I see a punk.

The fact you repeatedly insult Rittenhouse - to no effect whatsoever - means you must get -something- out of it.
If not to make you feel better, then what?

 

[Papageorgio]

Yep, or he could have been home playing his favorite violent video games.

Video games don't make you violent, at least that is what many studies claim. Playing video games doesn't lead to violent behaviour, study shows

Everyone at the riot could have made different paths for themselves, instead they all wanted to be in a dangerous place where physical harm could happen. All were guilty for being there and all had a right to be there.

 

[struth]

This is impeachable. Abuse of power.

Biden must go.

Well, he said it while he was running for office, not President I believe....but certainly it should of been a giant red flag coming from a person who's been in public office for 50 years.

 

[DrLove]

The fact you repeatedly insult Rittenhouse - to no effect whatsoever - means you must get -something- out of it.
If not to make you feel better, then what?

Hey if Babyface Kyle is your hero, so be it. He isn't mine. We all get to choose our heroes.

 

[M14 Shooter]

1. Said that the prosecution couldn't refer to the victims as victims

Prejudicial. it presumes Rittenhouse shot them illegally.

2. Reserved his ire ONLY for the prosecutor

Can you demonstrate anything the defense did or said that shoud lhave raised similar ire?

3. Led a round of applause for a defense witness just because he was a veteran

How is this in any way in violation of a the jurist code of conduct?

4. His ringtone is one of the goofiest songs ever written - God Bless the USA by Lee Greenwood

How is this in any way in violation of a the jurist code of conduct?

5. Constantly made the entire trial all about HIMSELF

This is a lie.

That'll do for starters

You better quit while you're behind.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Hey if Babyface Kyle is your hero....

You didn't answer the question:
The fact you repeatedly insult Rittenhouse - to no effect whatsoever - means you must get -something- out of it.
If not to make you feel better, then what?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

1. Said that the prosecution couldn't refer to the victims as victims
2. Reserved his ire ONLY for the prosecutor
3. Led a round of applause for a defense witness just because he was a veteran
4. His ringtone is one of the goofiest songs ever written - God Bless the USA by Lee Greenwood
5. Constantly made the entire trial all about HIMSELF
6. Cracked a racist joke about Asian food

That'll do for starters

Be specific now and cite the times the defense fucked up like the prosecution? And then explain why you hate us veterans?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Well, he said it while he was running for office, not President I believe....but certainly it should of been a giant red flag coming from a person who's been in public office for 50 years.

One can be impeached for things they did prior to being in office.

 

[DrLove]

Video games don't make you violent, at least that is what many studies claim. Playing video games doesn't lead to violent behaviour, study shows

Everyone at the riot could have made different paths for themselves, instead they all wanted to be in a dangerous place where physical harm could happen. All were guilty for being there and all had a right to be there.

There are other studies that say violent video games DO often lead to violence. Not always of course, but if you look at some of the worst mass murderers in history, most had that in common.

Klebold and Harris come to mind.

Do Violent Video Games Cause Violent Behavior? — CIVCM

by Jeremy David Johnson

civcm.psu.edu

Study confirms link between violent video games and physical aggression

Study finds link between violent games, aggression

www.wgrz.com

Computer games linked to violence

Violent video games step up aggressive behaviour in young males, according to both laboratory and real life studies, two US psychologists claim today.

www.theguardian.com

 

[Papageorgio]

There are other studies that say violent video games DO often lead to violence. Not always of course, but if you look at some of the worst mass murderers in history, most had that in common.

Klebold and Harris come to mind.

Do Violent Video Games Cause Violent Behavior? — CIVCM

by Jeremy David Johnson

civcm.psu.edu

Study confirms link between violent video games and physical aggression

Study finds link between violent games, aggression

www.wgrz.com

Computer games linked to violence

Violent video games step up aggressive behaviour in young males, according to both laboratory and real life studies, two US psychologists claim today.

www.theguardian.com

View attachment 564898

I personally think video games, movies, tv, music and books all contribute to ones personality, aggressive, non-aggressive, likes and dislikes. I have said that in the past got ripped for suggesting it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

It doesn't. But I know a punk when I see a punk.

The mirror?

 

[DrLove]

I personally think video games, movies, tv, music and books all contribute to ones personality, aggressive, non-aggressive, likes and dislikes. I have said that in the past got ripped for suggesting it.

There are dozens of peer reviewed studies that prove this point. That doesn't mean that the average kid who plays violent video games is going to be aggressive or kill someone. But most of the mass murderers appear to have that in common.

 

[JohnDB]

A hung jury wouldn't surprise me. They can re-try the case with a decent prosecutor and a judge who isn't a right wing, self promoting dick next time around.

Nope...
Judge can direct the verdict or declare a mistrial with prejudice.

And because of the evidence I can see either happening.

 

[DrLove]

Nope...
Judge can direct the verdict or declare a mistrial with prejudice.

And because of the evidence I can see either happening.

Judge can direct the verdict? Where did you come up with that? He can declare a mistrial with prejudice based on prosecutorial misconduct or something of that nature. Now that the jury is in deliberation, it's too late for that. If there is mistrial due to a hung jury, it will be up to the prosecutor whether they want to retry the case.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Judge can direct the verdict? Where did you come up with that?

Wow. You -really- know nothing about he law.

 

[tahuyaman]

Evidence doesn't matter to you, just politics.

Rittenhouse a right winger... guilty

Rittenhouse has no clue what he is.

 

[DrLove]

Wow. You -really- know nothing about he law.

Obviously, more than you do!

The judge may direct them to deliberate further, usually no more than once or twice. This direction is most commonly known as an Allen charge. If a verdict still cannot be delivered, at some point the judge will declare a mistrial due to the hung jury.

 

[tahuyaman]

Judge can direct the verdict? Where did you come up with that? He can declare a mistrial with prejudice based on prosecutorial misconduct or something of that nature. Now that the jury is in deliberation, it's too late for that. If there is mistrial due to a hung jury, it will be up to the prosecutor whether they want to retry the case.

If the jury can’t reach a verdict the judge would grant a mistrial. Then I believe it’s up the prosecution whether or not they try again. I don’t believe the judge would have the authority at this point to grant a mistrial with prejudice. He would have had to do that before it went to the jury in the first place.