Zincwarrior
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
It was a straw purchase. Thats why the purchaser who was a witness settled with the PoPo.and at that point it will end since he didnt purchase it legal or illegal,,
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a straw purchase. Thats why the purchaser who was a witness settled with the PoPo.and at that point it will end since he didnt purchase it legal or illegal,,
.likely funded by Soros these demafasict brownshirts have no shame
The purchase was.The gun wasn't illegal.
This is not a criminal defense trial. They will go back to his motivations and negligent behavior. Acquiring a rifle he could not have will be admissible, and why he brought it, and why he went there in violation of curfew with it. The standard is lower also.No, it doesn't. It starts with his killing of the swine being ruled by a COURT, as JUSTIFIED.
So your dumbass was unable or unwilling to watch the trial or read any of the evidence presented before mouthing off, I see.This is righteous civil litigation
A gun was pointed at his head.The purchase was.
This is not a criminal defense trial. They will go back to his motivations and negligent behavior. Acquiring a rifle he could not have will be admissible, and why he brought it, and why he went there in violation of curfew with it. The standard is lower also.
The real mistake was when the people Kyle pointed his rifle at didn't rush him and kill him. They could have saved two lives that day.
Yes, and frankly great reaction. The negligence occurred before that.A gun was pointed at his head.![]()
Going no where, Zinc. That dude shouldn't have been where he was, he put himself outYes, and frankly great reaction. The negligence occurred before that.
Having said that, the argument can be made that the follow on shootees were victims with a reasonable belief that they were stopping a mass shooter, a bad guy. That will come up again.
While I thought the self defense claim was reasonably proven, this is the problem with being a shooter in this circumstance. The civil trial will be a much different animal.Going no where, Zinc. That dude shouldn't have been where he was, he put himself out
there ......armed. He admitted he pointed the weapon at Rittenhouse....done deal
Cool ... glad to see these lawyers cashing in ... can't let a profit opportunity go ...
.Maybe he can sell some NFTs to pay his attorneys.
You just making shit up again?likely funded by Soros these demafasict brownshirts have no shame
They do it all day.You just making shit up again?
You just making shit up again?
No, it's true....you demafascist brownshirts have no shameYou just making shit up again?
No, really you can't make this stuff up....a demafascist brownshirt gets shot trying to murder someone, then files a lawsuit....it's amazingThey do it all day.
I don’t know who is funding it. That’s why I’m not making assumptions and tossing names out thereWho do you think is funding this law suit?