Rightists engage in violent rhetoric, calls for ‘civil war’ against Democrats and ‘the left’

[dudmuck]

WTF is "violent rhetoric"?

 

[Zincwarrior]

were gonna have a dance off! Hope you brought your dancing shoes!

Oh buddy, I came to party...DANCE PARTY!

 

[ThisIsMe]

Oh buddy, I came to party...DANCE PARTY!

Hell yeah!

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

‘A stew of hypertoxic rhetoric has surged through social media and American discourse after the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, inflaming a political environment that was already deeply polarized.

The most concerning messages, experts told NBC News, are proclamations from far-right activists, Republican politicians and conservative influencers about a coming civil war and the need for retribution or payback against the left for Kirk’s killing. The phrase “civil war” has spiked on social media and in Google searches.

“The Left is the party of murder,” Elon Musk posted on X to his 226 million followers, shortly after the shooting and before the gunman’s identity was known. He separately posted, “If they won’t leave us in peace, then our choice is fight or die,” without saying who “they” were.
[…]
The inflammatory language took off on Wednesday, immediately after the shooting. On social media platforms such as X, Truth Social and TikTok, as well as on Fox News, some personalities called for national law enforcement to target Democrats. Others compared Democrats to animals, demanded National Guard troops in more cities, declared themselves to have been “radicalized,” called for other forms of vengeance and repeatedly invoked the language of war as they reacted to Kirk’s killing.

The rush to judgment about the shooter’s motives, before a suspect was identified, went all the way up to President Donald Trump. In an Oval Office address on Wednesday evening, he blamed “radical left” rhetoric and said his administration would pursue anyone whose language he believes may have contributed to Kirk’s killing.’

Toxic rhetoric, including calls for 'civil war' and retribution, surges after Charlie Kirk killing

A stew of hypertoxic rhetoric has surged through social media and American discourse after the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, inflaming a political environment that was already deeply polarized.

www.nbcwashington.com

And conservatives continue to advance the lie that ‘the left’ is responsible for Kirk’s death.

Very dangerous.

 

[Manonthestreet]

A widely published Professor of War at King’s College London, Betz warns of the retribalization of Western societies. Mass migration and elite overreach, he argues, have created powder kegs of discontent awaiting the next spark of outrage: a horrific knifing or car-ramming or perhaps an exceptionally unjust judicial ruling. Citing multiple scholarly studies, Betz makes the case that the chances of civil war in the West erupting within the next five years—beginning with civil disturbances comparable with old-style peasant revolts—exceed 50 percent. Is the West Gestating Civil Unrest?
Go down to the second paragraph....we are there. There is no doubt most of our politicians have no interest in freedom

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Like you handled Charlie Kirk?

 

[HikerGuy83]

What drove Robinson to murder Kirk is still to be determined. It was most likely more than just politics.

Like what?

Please tell us what it is that you seem to imply deserves some level of empathy.

Me? I don't care.

When he's convicted, it should be straight to the firing squad where one guy (a very well trained marksman) takes out his neck.

 

[Lesh]

Like you handled Charlie Kirk?

Dismiss didn’t murder Kirk.
Some nutjob did

 

[Hafar1014]

Like what?

Please tell us what it is that you seem to imply deserves some level of empathy.

Me? I don't care.

When he's convicted, it should be straight to the firing squad where one guy (a very well trained marksman) takes out his neck).

He is a gay psychopath triggered by democrat hate speech based on trans ideology

 

[hadit]

‘A stew of hypertoxic rhetoric has surged through social media and American discourse after the killing of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, inflaming a political environment that was already deeply polarized.

Here's the take-away from the whole screed.

Be more upset about speech than because somebody actually killed another human being over speech.

 

[TimFitz]

It is not a lie that the left is responsible for Charlie Kirk's death.

Kirk was called "hateful", because he was against affirmative action and open borders, but he was for religion.

Factually

Your Personal Research Companion

factually.co

Charlie relished open debates of ideas, and was always respectful. The fact that so many hateful democrats celebrated his death by a sexual deviant says it all. In a battle between good and evil, Charlie Kirk was on the side of good and God.

Prove it.

Otherwise admit that you made it up.

 

[Hafar1014]

Here's the take-away from the whole screed.

Be more upset about speech than because somebody actually killed another human being over speech.

Democrat hate speech triggers violence

 

[TimFitz]

I hope you’re right because thsts exactly what thus country needs. The only way to purge and purify this nation

Boogaloo!

 

[Zincwarrior]

Like what?

Please tell us what it is that you seem to imply deserves some level of empathy.

Me? I don't care.

When he's convicted, it should be straight to the firing squad where one guy (a very well trained marksman) takes out his neck.

You I like!

 

[Zincwarrior]

He is a gay psychopath triggered by democrat hate speech based on trans ideology

Gays aren't the ones killing people.