- Moderator
- #321
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go figure.)
Go home, nat. You're drunk. Or liberal--or both.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go figure.)
Is you should educate yourself on what a sporting rifle is…Right wing morons on here are trying to appease their own sorry consciences (if they even have them) to avoid the salient fact.....
Assault weapons (and here they go into semantics about what an assault weapon may or may not be called in their cute little vernacular) killed MANY people in a very short period of time.....
SOoooooooo who allows the easy and open and readily available sale of such weapons????
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go ficgre.)
It was before wholesale invasive immigration brought radicals to radicalize those here.Yes, I know. Reagan allowed them to come from Afghanistan, but that was long before we understood the problem.Nice attempt to deflect from Obama's failure to do anything about Islamic terrorism. However, no one is buying it.
Idiot....want to check out when this terrorist family came to the US and WHO was president then????
Right wing morons on here are trying to appease their own sorry consciences (if they even have them) to avoid the salient fact.....
Assault weapons (and here they go into semantics about what an assault weapon may or may not be called in their cute little vernacular) killed MANY people in a very short period of time.....
SOoooooooo who allows the easy and open and readily available sale of such weapons????
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go ficgre.)
It was a Muslim who pulled the trigger, lets outlaw Muslims instead.Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.
Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR
You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......
If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,
Right wingers.....especially on this forum......Your choice is both simple and a tough one to make.
Either you continue to adamantly support the sale of assault weapons to maniacs....weapons whose ONLY purpose is to kill as many people as possible in the shortest amount of time...........OR
You employ some sanity and abandon this moronic notion that NO weapon should be outlawed so that you can "idealize' some stupid scenario that you must defend yourself from government troops......
If you have a conscience (and since most of you call yourselves "good Christians") you have a choice to make....Be tacitly complicit in mass murders....or change your attitude toward the sale of such lethal weapons,
Right wing morons on here are trying to appease their own sorry consciences (if they even have them) to avoid the salient fact.....
Assault weapons (and here they go into semantics about what an assault weapon may or may not be called in their cute little vernacular) killed MANY people in a very short period of time.....
SOoooooooo who allows the easy and open and readily available sale of such weapons????
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go ficgre.)
What I see in this thread is an absolute ratchet fear of even discussing the topic of gun control, and understanding that some guns are more dangerous than others
Right wing morons on here are trying to appease their own sorry consciences (if they even have them) to avoid the salient fact.....
Assault weapons (and here they go into semantics about what an assault weapon may or may not be called in their cute little vernacular) killed MANY people in a very short period of time.....
SOoooooooo who allows the easy and open and readily available sale of such weapons????
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go ficgre.)
Right wing morons on here are trying to appease their own sorry consciences (if they even have them) to avoid the salient fact.....
Assault weapons (and here they go into semantics about what an assault weapon may or may not be called in their cute little vernacular) killed MANY people in a very short period of time.....
SOoooooooo who allows the easy and open and readily available sale of such weapons????
It isn't liberal, who do that....It is "Christian" right wingers (who have chose to NOT have such weapons at their own gathering in Cleveland....Go ficgre.)
Gays are not a race....you daffy loon
i used the racist term (still very apropos to you and your ilk) because most of you morons would not be able to figure out what homophobia means without a dictionary.
How long did it take you to type that in so you could know what it means....?
Have Steve McGarrett come in here and explain the non difference between bigots and racists, he's good at it. You know Steve, the guy you never publicly have anything bad to say about because wingnuts like to play footsie with racists.
And, I acknowledge that is completely off topic...true none the less.
What I see in this thread is an absolute ratchet fear of even discussing the topic of gun control, and understanding that some guns are more dangerous than others
Stop.
A human with a desire to kill is more dangerous than any gun IN THE WORLD.
What I see in this thread is an absolute ratchet fear of even discussing the topic of gun control, and understanding that some guns are more dangerous than others
Stop.
A human with a desire to kill is more dangerous than any gun IN THE WORLD.
Stop for what, you? Nah.
Do me a favor, stop conflating guns and people as though it's and either/or situation, wingnut. Can you do that? We'll see, I don't have the best of hopes. Here's a hint, try to compare the effectiveness of a plumber without a wrench and you tell me how successful they are.
My concern is keeping those people with a 'desire to kill' from having the tools available to do so, especially those tools where the purpose is actually to kill.
What you are doing is arguing from a point of emotion rather than common sense. Maybe nothing can be done however you at least should recognize the methods of murder and establish which are more easy than others. I find the pro-gun (whatever that means) to be lacking and I haven't seen anything today to demonstrate differently.
Better mental health care and laws supporting it....What is the solution to homegrown terrorist with ties to ISIS?
He is actually a lefty posing as a righty. I have called him on it numerous times and he has never denied it. EverGays are not a race....you daffy loon
i used the racist term (still very apropos to you and your ilk) because most of you morons would not be able to figure out what homophobia means without a dictionary.
How long did it take you to type that in so you could know what it means....?
Have Steve McGarrett come in here and explain the non difference between bigots and racists, he's good at it. You know Steve, the guy you never publicly have anything bad to say about because wingnuts like to play footsie with racists.
And, I acknowledge that is completely off topic...true none the less.
You post makes no sense. What would you change Muslim immigrants for?
IDIOT....you started the subthread stating that trying to BAN assault weapons increased the screwed up "thirst" by your ilk to buy MORE of those weapons.....My point is then using your moronic logic is this....Would trying to BAN Muslims immigrants actually increase such Muslim immigrants.
Surely there's a grown up around to help you......If not, go to a corner and play with your guns.
What I see in this thread is an absolute ratchet fear of even discussing the topic of gun control, and understanding that some guns are more dangerous than others
Stop.
A human with a desire to kill is more dangerous than any gun IN THE WORLD.
Stop for what, you? Nah.
Do me a favor, stop conflating guns and people as though it's and either/or situation, wingnut. Can you do that? We'll see, I don't have the best of hopes. Here's a hint, try to compare the effectiveness of a plumber without a wrench and you tell me how successful they are.
My concern is keeping those people with a 'desire to kill' from having the tools available to do so, especially those tools where the purpose is actually to kill.
What you are doing is arguing from a point of emotion rather than common sense. Maybe nothing can be done however you at least should recognize the methods of murder and establish which are more easy than others. I find the pro-gun (whatever that means) to be lacking and I haven't seen anything today to demonstrate differently.![]()
O, AR-15s in France...0, fully automatic weapons in france...they still got them....how would you stop this guy....France has extreme gun control.......more than we have and all the gun control the gun grabbers dream about.....and terrorists on government, terrorists watch lists still got them....as do French criminals.....
And they have less civil rights than we do........
What does that have to do when I say an assault style does more damage than hand guns?
It doesn't...a .357 is a bigger round and you can get that in a 6 shot revolver...even in a stubby.....
That's awesome, name 5 mass shootings that involved nothing more than a single handgun that killed 30 people. Hell, that's too easy, name a mass shooting by a single hand gun that hit 80 or more people.
Can you name any mass shooting with an AR-15 that killed more than 30 people? Besides this one...asshole...try real hard.........
Thank you for proving my point. There were no mass shootings committed by people with hand guns over 30. What you are admitting to is that last nights shooting couldn't be committed by a single person with hand guns. Damn, I couldn't have said i any better myself.
Then, funny as all shit, you're post is practically begging me to prove your point for you. Double suck on your part.
I think it went over your head... LolWhat I see in this thread is an absolute ratchet fear of even discussing the topic of gun control, and understanding that some guns are more dangerous than others
Stop.
A human with a desire to kill is more dangerous than any gun IN THE WORLD.
Stop for what, you? Nah.
Do me a favor, stop conflating guns and people as though it's and either/or situation, wingnut. Can you do that? We'll see, I don't have the best of hopes. Here's a hint, try to compare the effectiveness of a plumber without a wrench and you tell me how successful they are.
My concern is keeping those people with a 'desire to kill' from having the tools available to do so, especially those tools where the purpose is actually to kill.
What you are doing is arguing from a point of emotion rather than common sense. Maybe nothing can be done however you at least should recognize the methods of murder and establish which are more easy than others. I find the pro-gun (whatever that means) to be lacking and I haven't seen anything today to demonstrate differently.![]()
Yeah, some wet dream world where Hitler and George Washington meet isn't reality. Please, please, save the energy.
Go home, nat. You're drunk. Or liberal--or both.
What does that have to do when I say an assault style does more damage than hand guns?
It doesn't...a .357 is a bigger round and you can get that in a 6 shot revolver...even in a stubby.....
That's awesome, name 5 mass shootings that involved nothing more than a single handgun that killed 30 people. Hell, that's too easy, name a mass shooting by a single hand gun that hit 80 or more people.
Can you name any mass shooting with an AR-15 that killed more than 30 people? Besides this one...asshole...try real hard.........
Thank you for proving my point. There were no mass shootings committed by people with hand guns over 30. What you are admitting to is that last nights shooting couldn't be committed by a single person with hand guns. Damn, I couldn't have said i any better myself.
Then, funny as all shit, you're post is practically begging me to prove your point for you. Double suck on your part.
He admitted no such thing. The fact that it hasn't occurred isn't proof that it couldn't occur. Before 9/11, passenger planes had never been used to destroy a building. According to your "logic," it should have been impossible.
Spare me your indignance, zealot. You can't bring yourself to condemn this as an act of terrorism. All you can do is blame the gun for the attack, and use this as a platform for restricting other people's Second Amendment rights.Go home, nat. You're drunk. Or liberal--or both.
In the face of your ilk's madness, one almost has to get drunk to put up with your hatred and moronic stubborn stances......but politically, yeah, sane people become "liberal"....
BTW who is MORE "liberal" when it comes to the easy sale of guns to murder lots of people?..