Certainly when an opposition party is PHYSICALLY restrained from sharing in the vote count, I would say that is an example of rigging...
Please provide a credible link to a single instance where a Republican Election
JUDGE was restrained from participating in the vote count.
Not pi$$ant so-called 'poll-observers', mind you, but honest-to-God appointed Election
JUDGES... you know... the ones who
do the actual
counting.
And... once you've found that... go ahead and give us sufficient reason to believe that there are enough votes at-stake to overturn the outcome in whole or in part.
...BUT for me personally, an EXTENSIVE RIGGING came from the Super Billionaires of Silicone Valley...
Thank you for that articulation of personal opinion...
...About 98% of political contributions from internet companies this cycle went to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics...
Probably has a lot to do with the idea that your Orange Baboon-God was perceived as a threat to American democracy and had to be stopped cold.
...But more of a factor then the money is the censorship of conservatives and Republicans along with FAKE NEWS and SLANTED NEWS
Probably has a lot to do with the ludicrous unsubstantiated bull$hit claims and false declarations that Cons-Pubs-Rumpians have been making on a half-dozen subjects.
Most of that so-called 'censoring' was merely the appending of host-platform commentary attached to the narrative, labeling it as spurious or dangerous to public health.
And, in instances where an account was suspended, it was virtually always for multiple violations of terms-of-service, after multiple warnings and appended cautionary notes.
Let us know when you have credible testimony from a single Undecided-Independent voter who would have voted (R) if he had seen any of the so-called 'censored' material.
And... once you've found that... go ahead and give us sufficient reason to believe that there are enough votes at-stake in context to overturn the outcome in whole or in part.
