get_involved
Gold Member
- Jul 16, 2009
- 2,046
- 432
- 130
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where do you get this crapola.
Factor out the illegals Obama doesn't have control of, and get back to us, asswipe.
He's a fourth term Gov with what percentage approval ?
Get back to us with that too, a-hole.
Where do you get this crapola.
Factor out the illegals Obama doesn't have control of, and get back to us, asswipe.
He's a fourth term Gov with what percentage approval ?
Get back to us with that too, a-hole.
I, for one, welcome a Perry candidacy. Let's let the rest of the country take a good luck at this so-called "miracle" in Gov. Perry's Texas and see just how much of the rest of country would like to be like Texas.
Where do you get this crapola.
Factor out the illegals Obama doesn't have control of, and get back to us, asswipe.
He's a fourth term Gov with what percentage approval ?
Get back to us with that too, a-hole.
Too bad the libs don't keep track of Obama's America in the same nit-picking way they criticize Texas.
"SAT scores - 45th" according this this link Commonwealth Foundation - 2010 SAT Scores by State
But as you can see, any state with higher than a "20% participation rate" (TX has 71%) is nowhere near the top 20 on the list. Most of the so-called top 20 only have single digit participation rates, for example South Dakota has a 3% participation rate and yet they rank #6....hardly fair when 97% of their studens didn't participate in the test. You can tell just by looking at the chart, that when more students take the test, the states overall scores go down.
% 25 and older with HS diploma -50th, as well as Birth rate stats and uninsured---
Yet again when you consider Texas' high illegal population (2nd only to CA) as well black population(20th) and hispanic(2nd), it really isn't surprising as all states with higher % of those populations rank lower.
Too bad the libs don't keep track of Obama's America in the same nit-picking way they criticize Texas.
Obama's supporters criticizing Perry's success are like the pimple faced nerd criticizing the Football Team's Star Quarterback for having a girlfriend who "isn't smart". And then he goes home to his girlfriend, "Rosie Palm".
"SAT scores - 45th" according this this link Commonwealth Foundation - 2010 SAT Scores by State
But as you can see, any state with higher than a "20% participation rate" (TX has 71%) is nowhere near the top 20 on the list. Most of the so-called top 20 only have single digit participation rates, for example South Dakota has a 3% participation rate and yet they rank #6....hardly fair when 97% of their studens didn't participate in the test. You can tell just by looking at the chart, that when more students take the test, the states overall scores go down.
% 25 and older with HS diploma -50th, as well as Birth rate stats and uninsured---
Yet again when you consider Texas' high illegal population (2nd only to CA) as well black population(20th) and hispanic(2nd), it really isn't surprising as all states with higher % of those populations rank lower.
Curious to see the rebuttal to this
![]()
Too bad the libs don't keep track of Obama's America in the same nit-picking way they criticize Texas.
Obama's supporters criticizing Perry's success are like the pimple faced nerd criticizing the Football Team's Star Quarterback for having a girlfriend who "isn't smart". And then he goes home to his girlfriend, "Rosie Palm".
What success??? Tell us which of those stats are wrong?? If you can't do that, STFU!!! You teabagheads are always running your mouths but can't come up with any justification.
Too bad the libs don't keep track of Obama's America in the same nit-picking way they criticize Texas.