You come across as a science illiterate , turd sandwichProve it. You're lying and will end up in hell after you die.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You come across as a science illiterate , turd sandwichProve it. You're lying and will end up in hell after you die.
I have the scientific truth as science backs up the Bible. In contrast, you are SAF and a POS. You will end up in hell forever where you will be able to see me in heaven. OTOH, I won't be able to see what happens to you in hell, but I'll take the Bible's word for it. No need to see you screaming your ass off forever.You come across as a science illiterate , turd sandwich
“ | Children who are raised with religious or spiritual beliefs tend to have better mental health into their adulthood, a new study from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health found. According to the study’s findings, people who attended weekly religious services or prayed or meditated daily in their childhood reported greater life satisfaction in their 20s. People who grew up in a religious household also reported fewer symptoms of depression and lower rates of post-traumatic stress disorder.[3] |
Who are these, “many biologists”?
“Evolution News” is a dumping ground for creationer hacks.As usual, the un-believers, such as Fort Fun Indiana, Quasar44, Hollie, alang1216, etc., cannot prove the so-called evolution of the eye. It just isn't so as Dawkins liked to think.
"By building a straw man of creationists (supposedly) misquoting Darwin and Lewontin, Professor Dawkins labels the lot as “ignorant” and skirts the big issue — there is no hard evidence for molecules-to-man evolution.
Dawkins has long touted stories on how the eye and other organs came into being by supposed slow evolutionary processes, but there is no experimental evidence, even if one did accept the fossils as a record of such changes. Any serious thinker knows that the fossils of the “Cambrian Explosion” period, near the base of the geological column, include some of the most sophisticated eyes ever known to have existed — the compound eyes of trilobites have double calcite lenses, which defeat any slow evolutionary explanation, and, what is more, they have no precursor in the rocks.
The non-evolutionist side of the argument is growing not because of ignorance, but because of the rise of knowledge about the real facts of science without the fairytale additions of evolutionism. A growing number of academics on both sides of the Atlantic are attracted to the straightforward logic of scientific reasoning.
The logical, coded machinery of DNA and the information system it carries shout design to an unprejudiced mind. Dawkins’s defence is based not on scientific facts, but on ideology. Evolutionary thinking is teetering as a way of looking at the evidence, not because of some isolated problems here and there, but because the whole structure is scientifically wrong."
Dawkins’ Eye-con of Evolution Unravels | Evolution News
Leading Darwin defender Richard Dawkins had a piece in The Times of London recently, reassuring readers, “The eye is today a showpiece of the gradual, cumulative evolution of an almost perfect…evolutionnews.org