Return to the correct understanding of Freedom

[rupol2000]

It is clear that irrelevant freedom is meaningless and contradictory, for example, the rights of predator and prey contradict each other.

That's why the "freedoms" of queers, cannibals, pedophiles, flag burners are not legal.

The correct interpretation of freedom is to establish freedom within the framework of responsibility.

For example, someone assumes obligations to carry out some kind of enterprise, he must be given the freedoms that he needs to implement this enterprise

The responsible person is not granted additional rights that are not related to his activities, such as the rights to molest children or promote Eurocentrism or same-sex marriage. For example, he may be given the right to develop an enterprise project, the right to use technics at his own discretion, and so on.

 

[Woodznutz]

It's worse than that. People don't even take responsibility for their own basic physical health. Can civic and moral illness be far behind?