This post is just ... bizarre. ...
Oh, I agree wholeheartedly!
That post (#124) IS bizarre. I'll go ahead and give you credit for admitting it upfront, though.
What, you've never stopped for a meal while passing through or visiting another major metropolitan area in your own home state?
First, had you bothered to break down and read the
first fucking post I made in this thread (post 3 here), you would have seen where I said I do exactly that, which is how I know Mary and her restaurant.
It was
literally the second sentence I posted in this thread, dude. Read much?
I didn't
bother to go back and read every post in this thread immediately after the merger took place, because I felt obliged (don't ask me why) to first respond to your reply to one of my pre-merger posts.
However daunting a two-hour drive (4 to 6 hours there and back, meal included) might seem
to you, pointing out the distance between Asheville and Winston-Salem doesn't seem very compelling
to me as a reason not to make that little road-trip for the sake of interacting with some of the players in this
national story.
And second, Asheville and Winston Salem are 145 miles apart, not a "reasonable driving distance". Much as I love Mary's, I don't jump in the car and drive two hours for breakfast. If I lived in Asheville (which I once did) it would be even further.
Well, although I'm presently living in south-eastern Ohio, I grew up in California about 3 hours from San Fran and close to 8 hours from Disneyland, so my perspective could be a little off-kilter; but leaving from Asheville at 6 AM in order to be back home by 11 or 11:30 AM doesn't seem the least bit prohibitive to me. Again, not just for breakfast, but for a shot at making a few more ripples in an already big-time story or maybe just for the chance to meet some of the people involved. It's not like I'm condoning a daily commute here.
...As for "out-of-staters", Virginia is closer than Asheville. So is South Carolina. ...
You don't saaay. Are there any well-known hubs along the borders of those states (or within a 145 mi. radius of the restaurant) that might rival
The Pagan Mecca of the Southeast?
...And third, there is no "satanist religion". That's a joke, and you're the butt. ...
Just for the sake of argument, and possibly much to the consternation of any self-avowed Satanist who may be reading this (whether theistic or LaVeyan), I’ll concede the point that there is no “satanist religion”. Would you further deny the status of ‘religion’ to organized Wicca or to any other 'earth-based' path with roots in one or more of the ancient Celtic religions?
...Oh. I see, you read it on the internets therefore it's real.
Not at all. It's just that IÂ’ve interacted with sincere believers in theistic Satanism, as well as those more in tune with the precepts and principles of Anton Lavey and the official
Church of Satan, so I know that Diane VeraÂ’s work is largely right on the money.
...Paganism has nothing to do with "Satan". Â…
Sorry, but your close-minded adherence to false ideas doesnÂ’t make them any less false.
Â…Satan is a Christian invention. Â…
Yes, and? -- Would you feel less skeptical about the existence of satanic religionists if everyone started calling them Satanic Christians? – Because I, for one, would be fine with that.
Incidentally, the term “pagan” is also a Christian invention.
From
here
[. . .] In the West, we have these various words: pagan, Christian, and atheist. In the eyes of some Christians, all who do not worship their God are pagans and outsiders. This is an indication of the weight that Christians give to the refusal to believe their doctrine. An interesting fact is that the term 'atheist' was first used by 'pagans' to describe Christians. Because adherents of the old religion were very pious, if someone refused to make even a tiny offering to the Gods, they were called atheists because the Christians did not believe in the Gods of the ancestral tradition. [2]
One thing is quite certain. The first use of the word pagan in antiquity referred to worshipers of the ancient Gods, the Hellenic Gods in particular, of the Roman Empire. Jonathan Kirsch in his book God Against The Gods says
" 'Pagan' is a word invented by early Christians to describe anyone who refused to recognize the Only True God, and no self-respecting pagan ever described himself as one." [3]
Therefore, our tradition has more "claim," so to speak, to this term than any religion or sect, whether the word is desirable or not. According to Robin Lane Fox in Pagans and Christians, it was the Christians who first used the term to refer to the adherents of the old tradition:
"Pagani were civilians who had not enlisted through baptism as soldiers (Latin: milites) of Christ against the powers of Satan." [4]
The word pagan comes from the Latin paganus. [1] According to Pierre Chuvin:
"A paganus is the inhabitant of a pagus, a country district, a man whose roots, unlike a soldier's, are where he lives." [5]
Further, Chuvin goes on to say that pagans are those who
"preserved their local customs, whereas the alieni, the 'people from elsewhere,' were increasingly Christian." [6]
So, from Chuvin's idea, we see another dimension, not unlike the idea of ethnic, rather than a condescending concept. Yet he states that the use of the term is consistently pejorative. [1] [Â…][emphasis CapstoneÂ’s]
I guess pagan religions must be non-existent too, right? ...J/K.
Â…it's the height of ignorance to first invent your own devil and then hang it on those competitors who threaten you. Nothing new here; that's what Christianism did by inventing Saul Alinksy in the first place. Uh, I mean Lucifer. Whatever. That's still got absolutely nothing to do with anything here.
Unless, of course, someone foolishly espouses that any religious ideologies born of embracing the devil so nefariously created by Christendom Â…are
non-existent by default, which seems to be what youÂ’re arguing.
Â…Again, "Satan" is a Christianism invention; pagans don't believe in it. "Satanism" is satire based on that silliness, and you're apparently too shallow to process itÂ….
What
youÂ’re apparently too shallow to process is that there are several schools of thought in play among many self-proclaimed Satanists. Not all of them follow the satirical dictates of Anton LaVey.
Â…Mary (the proprietor here) is herself one of those pagans -- except you're still in the wrong city altogether. WS is further from Asheville that Philadelphia is from Washington DC. How many Philadelphians do you know that traipse down to DC just for breakfast? Do you imagine Asheville has no restaurants?
Probably not too many “just for breakfast”, but I’m pretty confident that quite a few have made that trek for other reasons.
Regarding
The Pagan Mecca of the Southeast:
Â…--- a phrase YOU brought in, a metaphorical phrase anyway, in reference to another unrelated city that's nowhere near this restaurant, and now when you've been called on geographical head-up-the-ass ignorance you're spinning like a Maytag on MondayÂ….
What “spin” would that be exactly?
In-state or out, name another world-renowned hotspot for Paganism (in its myriad of forms, including a few Satanic ones) thatÂ’s as close or closer to the diner than Asheville.
Â…A friend and I once got in a car in western NC and drove to the ocean. It took us literally all day. Even where I live I'm further west than Cleveland. So the fact that two places both exist in North Cackalackee doesn't in any way mean they're in "reasonable traveling distance" of each other. Dumbass.
ItÂ’s all a matter of perspective. IÂ’ve done more traveling than the average Joe, both professionally and for my own private purposes, so my sights are probably wider than most. However, I donÂ’t feel that driving for 2 and a quarter hours with the right goal in mind is in any way unreasonable.
IÂ’m always happy to agree to disagree with folks like you, though.
Â…And fourth, the restaurant and its staff are more pagan than anything else, which means they would welcome anything. They're certainly not conventional types....
ThatÂ’s good to hear, but it doesnÂ’t seem to account for the unhappiness of some of the workers.
What? Now you want to discuss the topic? I can't keep up...
You can say that again.
