I'm trying to gauge the depth of support for Putin and Russia amongst Trump supporters, and whether or not this will survive into a Harris Presidency.
Can you see yourself "switching sides" in this war if Donald Trump loses this election?
### Analysis of the Ukraine War Based on Potential U.S. Presidential Outcomes
The ongoing conflict in Ukraine is significantly influenced by U.S. foreign policy, which could shift dramatically depending on whether Donald Trump or Kamala Harris wins the White House in the upcoming election.
#### Potential Outcomes with Donald Trump
Shift in U.S. Support
If Trump returns to the presidency, there is a strong possibility that U.S. military support for Ukraine could be reduced or even halted. Trump has expressed skepticism about the value of continued aid, arguing that it diverts resources from pressing domestic issues and suggesting that the war is a "lost cause". His administration might prioritize negotiations with Russia, potentially at the expense of Ukraine's territorial integrity.
Claims of Quick Resolution
Trump has claimed he could end the war in just 24 hours, although he has not detailed how he would achieve this.
#### Potential Outcomes with Kamala Harris
Continuation of Current Policies
If Kamala Harris wins, it is expected that U.S. support for Ukraine would largely continue along the lines established by the Biden administration.
Challenges Ahead
However, even under a Harris administration, challenges remain. The increasing threat from China and domestic political pressures could complicate the U.S. commitment to Ukraine. There is a possibility that funding for Ukraine could be squeezed, forcing Ukraine to rely more on European support and loans backed by frozen Russian assets.
### Conclusion
The outcome of the U.S. presidential election will have significant implications for the Ukraine war. A Trump victory could lead to a reduction in U.S. support and a potential shift towards negotiations that may not favor Ukraine, while a Harris victory would likely see a continuation of current policies aimed at supporting Ukraine against Russian aggression( because of NATO expansion ). The situation remains fluid, and the strategic decisions made by either administration will be crucial in determining the future of the conflict.
==> War is a racket, who benefited most from the Ukraine conflict? You should go ask the energy companies( Nord Stream sabotage ), the US Congress, military contractors and Pentagon. Harris & Biden evidently don't like Putin. Nuclear war is likely if Harris wins the White House! Amen...
Sources :
It’s possible European NATO members could convince a Trump White House to leave Kyiv’s military backing to them — with some strings attached.
www.politico.eu
Donald Trump's latest comments on Russia and Ukraine have caused concern in Europe.
www.bbc.com
Ex-president spoke to Nigel Farage about Ukraine, Biden and Putin
www.independent.co.uk
Ukrainians are determined to fight on whatever the result, but without US support their position would be perilous, says political scientist Rajan Menon
www.theguardian.com
During the first presidential debate, Donald Trump said he could "settle" the conflict by January if he wins a second term. EU chief von der Leyen calls for €500 billion to shore up the bloc's defenses. DW has more.
www.dw.com
Former President Trump welcomed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyau to his Mar-a-Lago home in Florida for their first face-to-face meeting since Trump left the White House.
www.foxnews.com
Ukraine’s allies are scrambling to secure long-term aid for Kyiv amid fears about a second Trump term.
www.politico.eu
