Republicans fail to make any rational argument why society must force full term gestation on all women. Their failed arguments are examined here:

Status
Not open for further replies.
TruthNotBS said:
You're so fucking dumb. Think. When you force a single woman, to remain pregnant, she has to give birth. DUH. She needs healthcare, she'll probably lose her job at some point or won't be able to work, due to her pregnancy. Are you going to feed her and pay her rent? She's going to need Medicaid or some help from the government to cover the cost of giving birth in a hospital. That's 20K at least. An abortion is peanuts compared to that. Nothing. Planned Parenthood will abort your pregnancy for $600. Less than a $1000. You're crying about the government paying for abortions when giving birth is more than twenty times that amount. You're an imbecile.
Click to expand...
And the guy is forced to pay 118 years of child support, or she sucks on the Government tit for 18 years and then has to get pregnant again or get a job.
 
TruthNotBS said:
In an ideal world, women will only get pregnant when they're ready to be mothers. It takes two to tango, so the man that got her pregnant is also at fault. It's not just women.
Click to expand...
And we'd get accused of genocide or whatever when we require all women across the globe to get this treatment as a condition of getting handouts. The problem with feeding the poor is instead of using it to better themselves, they beget more humans who require the government to feed them and do ads on TV showing emancipated children begging for your help.
 
Unkotare said:
A human life is invaluable.
Click to expand...
Until you have to provide it with social services huh? You talk all of this self-righteous bullshit and then when that single mom needs foodstamps to feed herself and her child, or some rental assistance, or Medicaid, or help with child daycare, or job training, assholes like you shout:

"NO! GO GET A JOB BITCH, YOU BUM! TOO BAD IF YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH TO BUY YOUR CHILDREN WHAT THEY NEED, TOO BAD! NOT ONE MORE PENNY FROM ME BITCH!"...

When she's pregnant with a mere embryo or half-brained fetus, you're like "Yeah, no problem, we'll spend 35K in hospital bills to make sure you give birth, no problem", but after that, when the baby is breathing, alive, here with us in the world, as a member of society, you're like:

"FUCK YOU, BABY, GO TO HELL, I'M NOT SPENDING A PENNY ON YOUR ASS, TELL YOUR MOM TO GET A JOB, THAT SORRY ASS BITCH"...

You're the most pathetic hypocrites of them all. Babies in Gaza, Ukotare.."Die A-rab baby! Go to Hell Without The Bail, go to hell baby! Die! Die! A-rab baby!" Freaking hypocrite. You and your crocodile tears for fetuses in the wombs of strangers. You don't give a shit, about that single mom and her baby, you just care about fetuses. You have a fucking obsession with embryos and half-brained fetuses in the wombs of strangers. Crying your crocodile tears over fetuses.

crocodile.png

"Ukotare"​
 
Slyhunter said:
And we'd get accused of genocide or whatever when we require all women across the globe to get this treatment as a condition of getting handouts. The problem with feeding the poor is instead of using it to better themselves, they beget more humans who require the government to feed them and do ads on TV showing emancipated children begging for your help.
Click to expand...
The solution is to get rid of poverty and educate people, teaching them how to think critically and value life and community.
 
TruthNotBS said:
The solution is to get rid of poverty and educate people, teaching them how to think critically and value life and community.
Click to expand...
Not possible, we aren’t equally equipped
 
TruthNotBS said:
...

...Babies in Gaza, Ukotare...
Click to expand...

Also invaluable treasures. Is your new position advocating for abortions in Gaza? I don't think you'd be too popular there.
 
Last edited:
jc456 said:
won't be any money
Click to expand...
You don't need money when you have labor, and if that labor works 24/7 for a few cents hourly in electricity, you'll have more food than you've ever had. Money is only necessary when humans have to do most of the work. Production and the delivery of goods and services can be done in a marketless economy, without money. There's no need for a medium of exchange without a market. You'll be given generous access to the goods and services that you need and want, provided you work a few hours weekly, supervising the robots.

You may be able to work from home for two or three hours, five days weekly and in return society grants you three gallons of milk, x amount of this, and x amount of that, and your wife has also three gallons of milk weekly, hence between you and your wife you have six gallons of milk weekly. DAMN. You work x amount of time, and you get x amount of pounds in beef, in cheese, in ham, bread, eggs..etc. You have a house, you have a personal robot and so does your wife, you have the latest computers, vehicles..etc. Life in a high-tech world doesn't need markets or money. Money as a medium of exchange and for-profit production are obsolete. The computers do all of the accounting and take care of the logistics. This isn't 20th century socialism, it's the 21st century. We have a lot of technology, to meet our needs and produce everything for us.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ralph Nader Sounds Like an Anti semite

< Previous Thread

That big poll showing Trump and Biden are evenly matched? Trump helped pay for it.

Next Thread >

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom