Republican Compares Obama to the Terrorists that Crashed United Airlines Flight 93

[Darkwind]

Comprehension and deep thinking has never been your forte, so I won't even bother with trying to explain simple parallels to you...

And simple parallels are beyond your ability to explain, so yes, don't bother.

There is no parallel, is there? But thanks for playing.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Of Course VaYank has mastered an uncanny ability to work the word "comprehension" into almost every sentence!

BRAVO!!!

 

[VaYank5150]

you actually have the audacity to question other peoples intelligence?

What is the very best defense one can have? Do you know?

The country of citizenship means nothing. If it was determined that Saudi Arabia was involved, they would have been hit too.

So, tell Me again how it is that the responsibility of the President of the United States does not include defending this country?

Or are you one of those people who believe that they have to be storming our shores before we are permitted to defend ourselves?

Are you always this rabid sounding? I asked you what SHOULD HAVE BEEN a very simple question. Instead, you spew bullshit. Please do try to stay on topic, will you?

I answered you question. It is not My problem that you have no answer to the truth.

As to the analogy that Obama is flying the plane into the ground ala Flight 93, I find it a very poor analogy.

The pilots of that plane flew it into the ground to save America. To imply that The Obama (may his camels be free of parasites) is trying to save America is pretty silly. It would also put those who oppose Obama as terrorists.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

No, you really didn't. Are you trying to say that as POTUS, Bush chose the "the best defense is a good offense" approach to "defending" us? If so, how did this offensive approach (.i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

 

[VaYank5150]

Of Course VaYank has mastered an uncanny ability to work the word "comprehension" into almost every sentence!

BRAVO!!!

I'm sorry. I hate it when you can't understand what I type. I will try to use smaller words when I know you are trying to chime in with something intelligent...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

Another "DUH" moment from VaYank...

******* mouthbreathing Vaginian.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm sorry

Understatement of the century.

 

[Darkwind]

Are you always this rabid sounding? I asked you what SHOULD HAVE BEEN a very simple question. Instead, you spew bullshit. Please do try to stay on topic, will you?

I answered you question. It is not My problem that you have no answer to the truth.

As to the analogy that Obama is flying the plane into the ground ala Flight 93, I find it a very poor analogy.

The pilots of that plane flew it into the ground to save America. To imply that The Obama (may his camels be free of parasites) is trying to save America is pretty silly. It would also put those who oppose Obama as terrorists.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

No, you really didn't. Are you trying to say that as POTUS, Bush chose the "the best defense is a good offense" approach to "defending" us? If so, how did this offensive approach (.i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

Taking the fight to the enemy is not a Bush strategy. It is a strategy that has been proven throughout history.

If your enemies are too busy ducking, hiding and running from your overwhelming force, they have little time to attack us here at home. Pretty straight forward logic.

There are those in this country who believe that we should have only gone after those who attacked us. If that were the case, there would have been no war because those who attacked us died on 9/11.

We also have responsibilities to our allies as well.

This is all pretty basic. But it is also off topic.

And I've explained why I think that Mr. Obama is trying to drive down our economy.

 

[VaYank5150]

i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

Another "DUH" moment from VaYank...

******* mouthbreathing Vaginian.

In other words, Soggy is either too stupid or too partisan to EVER answer the question truthfully. Of course, no one here is shocked by this, but I am just here pointing out the obvious.

 

[Darkwind]

Enjoy your day peeps.

Since I am in a pretty foul mood, I think its best that I go do something else.

 

[VaYank5150]

I answered you question. It is not My problem that you have no answer to the truth.

As to the analogy that Obama is flying the plane into the ground ala Flight 93, I find it a very poor analogy.

The pilots of that plane flew it into the ground to save America. To imply that The Obama (may his camels be free of parasites) is trying to save America is pretty silly. It would also put those who oppose Obama as terrorists.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

No, you really didn't. Are you trying to say that as POTUS, Bush chose the "the best defense is a good offense" approach to "defending" us? If so, how did this offensive approach (.i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

Taking the fight to the enemy is not a Bush strategy. It is a strategy that has been proven throughout history.

If your enemies are too busy ducking, hiding and running from your overwhelming force, they have little time to attack us here at home. Pretty straight forward logic.

There are those in this country who believe that we should have only gone after those who attacked us. If that were the case, there would have been no war because those who attacked us died on 9/11.

We also have responsibilities to our allies as well.

This is all pretty basic. But it is also off topic.

And I've explained why I think that Mr. Obama is trying to drive down our economy.

So, taking the fight to the Iraqi's was a good strategy even though terrorists from Saudi Arabia attacked us?

 

[VaYank5150]

Enjoy your day peeps.

Since I am in a pretty foul mood, I think its best that I go do something else.

If I bought into and then had to defend this whole "attack Iraq to keep the terorists in Afghanistan busy" strategy, I would be in a pretty foul mood too.

 

[Darkwind]

No, you really didn't. Are you trying to say that as POTUS, Bush chose the "the best defense is a good offense" approach to "defending" us? If so, how did this offensive approach (.i.e, Iraq invasion and occupation) defend us?

Taking the fight to the enemy is not a Bush strategy. It is a strategy that has been proven throughout history.

If your enemies are too busy ducking, hiding and running from your overwhelming force, they have little time to attack us here at home. Pretty straight forward logic.

There are those in this country who believe that we should have only gone after those who attacked us. If that were the case, there would have been no war because those who attacked us died on 9/11.

We also have responsibilities to our allies as well.

This is all pretty basic. But it is also off topic.

And I've explained why I think that Mr. Obama is trying to drive down our economy.

So, taking the fight to the Iraqi's was a good strategy even though terrorists from Saudi Arabia attacked us?

You are too hung up on what country they came from.

Why don't you focus upon the governments of the countries we did dispose of.

I'm out of here.

 

[Darkwind]

Enjoy your day peeps.

Since I am in a pretty foul mood, I think its best that I go do something else.

If I bought into and then had to defend this whole "attack Iraq to keep the terorists in Afghanistan busy" strategy, I would be in a pretty foul mood too.

As I said. Not very good with critical thought.

My mood is from something else. I had hoped that some time here would distract Me, but it hasn't.

Have a pleasant day.

 

[VaYank5150]

Taking the fight to the enemy is not a Bush strategy. It is a strategy that has been proven throughout history.

If your enemies are too busy ducking, hiding and running from your overwhelming force, they have little time to attack us here at home. Pretty straight forward logic.

There are those in this country who believe that we should have only gone after those who attacked us. If that were the case, there would have been no war because those who attacked us died on 9/11.

We also have responsibilities to our allies as well.

This is all pretty basic. But it is also off topic.

And I've explained why I think that Mr. Obama is trying to drive down our economy.

So, taking the fight to the Iraqi's was a good strategy even though terrorists from Saudi Arabia attacked us?

You are too hung up on what country they came from.

Why don't you focus upon the governments of the countries we did dispose of.

I'm out of here.

IF our strategy, as you suggest was to keep the terrorists busy, so they could not attack us here, why would I give a shit about the governments of the countries we disposed of?

 

[VaYank5150]

Enjoy your day peeps.

Since I am in a pretty foul mood, I think its best that I go do something else.

If I bought into and then had to defend this whole "attack Iraq to keep the terorists in Afghanistan busy" strategy, I would be in a pretty foul mood too.

As I said. Not very good with critical thought.
My mood is from something else. I had hoped that some time here would distract Me, but it hasn't.

Have a pleasant day.

Very good. Admitting you have a problem is the first step in correcting it. Good luck on your journey.

 

[indianaboy]

Poor analogy.

The people aboard Flight 93 at least got a pack of peanuts before flying into the ground.

 

[geauxtohell]

I thought it was a benign statement until he added the "lets roll"

For FoxNews it would be acceptable, for an elected representative, it is inappropriate

I agree. Up to that phrase, I was about to hit the "somebody is over-reacting" button".

Since he obviously was trying to compare Obama to the terrorists on Flight 93, my response is that this is another typical to make other Americans think Obama is a Muslim.

"If we just keep insinuating it, maybe it will stick."

 

[The Rabbi]

was the socialistic medicare pill bill of the republicans and president bush, (that they illegally passed in the house i might add by taking a 15 minute vote and leaving it opened for 3 hours in order to bribe other republicans to change their vote to yes so that it would pass), them intentionally running our government in to the ground rabb? Was that republicans wanting to make us like socialistic europe?

booossshhhh!!! It's booossshhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[VaYank5150]

was the socialistic medicare pill bill of the republicans and president bush, (that they illegally passed in the house i might add by taking a 15 minute vote and leaving it opened for 3 hours in order to bribe other republicans to change their vote to yes so that it would pass), them intentionally running our government in to the ground rabb? Was that republicans wanting to make us like socialistic europe?

booossshhhh!!! It's booossshhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Great non-answer. You Pubs are full of 'em!

 

[The Rabbi]

was the socialistic medicare pill bill of the republicans and president bush, (that they illegally passed in the house i might add by taking a 15 minute vote and leaving it opened for 3 hours in order to bribe other republicans to change their vote to yes so that it would pass), them intentionally running our government in to the ground rabb? Was that republicans wanting to make us like socialistic europe?

booossshhhh!!! It's booossshhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Great non-answer. You Pubs are full of 'em!

I think Care4All is a Democrat but I could be wrong.
You are right that her answer was a non-answer.