REP Primary Turnout Historic Up 60%!

[BluesLegend]

The only problem Trump has, is the style in which he's delivering his message. Many can't handle his honest directness. Most are used to being bombarded with PC drivel. Many are more comfortabe being lied to. But Trump's message is Spot On. He's the only Candidate that's serious about Border Security and bringing jobs back to Americans.

Trump has the winning message. The overwhelming support proves that. He's just been very blunt in expressing it thus far. Personally, i've enjoyed it. But many can't handle that kind of blunt honesty. It's worked in the Primaries though. However, now that he has the Nomination locked up, he can soften the delivery a bit. It's time to beat Clinton. That battle is gonna be epic. Can't wait.

His being blunt is good for America because most Americans need to relearn and practice being blunt.

Calling BS on the establishment propaganda and lies isn't really being blunt.

 

[jillian]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

and?

thanks for more nonsense from breitbart though.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

lol

Wrong and ignorant as always.

The president is elected by the states via the EC, not by popular vote.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I didn't think it would be possible to have more USMB fun watching an election than we had in 2012. ****....I was wrong.

 

[dannyboys]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

And those Republican voters are voting for someone other than Trump, in some cases a majority, where they won't be voting for Trump come this November.

 

[NYcarbineer]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

I support Sanders, **** monkey.

 

[DarkFury]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

And those Republican voters are voting for someone other than Trump, in some cases a majority, where they won't be voting for Trump come this November.

The "elite" don't want Trump, but the voters do.

 

[DarkFury]

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

Damn sure like your writing style! Wish I could give it comment of the month.

 

[dannyboys]

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.

For all you 'man-bun' LIBs here's some light reading.
The increase of 60% REP turnout ought to get your 'flop-sweat' working overtime.
This 60% increase over the primary season in 2012 happened for only one reason. That reason has a name. The name isn't Cruz of Kasich is it?
Go ahead and say his name. You may as well get used to the name with 'President' in front of it.
Exclusive Data Analysis: GOP Primary Turnout Up 8.7 Million Votes, More Than 60 Percent in 2016 Versus 2012 - Breitbart

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

I support Sanders, **** monkey.

So when Hillary becomes the nominee you're going to do what?

 

[NYcarbineer]

...and it has no bearing on the GE.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.

Turnout reflects the nature of the race, factors like how many candidates are in the race, what sort of candidates are in the race, and how competitive the race is.

The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

I support Sanders, **** monkey.

So when Hillary becomes the nominee you're going to do what?

I'm not going to vote for her. I will accept her as the lesser of two evils.

 

[dannyboys]

A 60% increase in republican voter turn out months before the general means nothing? How about we call that ad hoc idiocy?
MORON.

OK asshol NYcarbineer. And now you will explain the reason for such a huge increase in REP turnout in this year's primaries so far.
Waiting.
The race isn't close to competitive obviously.
The 60% increase isn't because ******* Cruz and Kasich are still in the race. That's obvious by the numbers these two candidates have received.
That leads to only one answer: The 'answer's' name is Trump.
Don't want to admit it? Who the ***** .

So your argument is that the real reason for the big turnout is that the mainstream of the Republican party and/or conservatism has suddenly decided that in reality they hate everything about the Republicans they've been defending for decades?

That's right you asshole!
Just like millions of DEMs are essentially telling YOUR dried up old lesbian bull dyke, chronic liar, common thief, cocaine smuggler, possible accomplish in multiple murders, sexual predator enabler, multimillionaire, genius stock market investor, that they would rather vote for a 74 year old raving ******* Socialist/Communist instead of Hillary.
Any normal person would be so ******* embarrassed they would crawl under a rock. But not Hillary! Oh no!
She is so ******* low life she is willing to take the 'block vote' from a bunch of 'Special Needs' negroes with an average IQ in the low eighties by speaking 'ebonics' to them and thinking she is achieving something.
She can't even get females under thirty to show up at her ******* rallies.
So you go ahead and vote for your ******* bull dyke.
Wait until Trump gets the nomination. Then a few billion dollars in campaign ads telling the voters who Hillary really is will be a delight to watch.

I support Sanders, **** monkey.

So when Hillary becomes the nominee you're going to do what?

I'm not going to vote for her. I will accept her as the lesser of two evils.

How about trying to make sense asshole?
You say you aren't going to vote for her. In the next sentence you say you will "accept her". You really ought to lay off the bong pal.