Relationship between IQ and political orientation

rupol2000

Gold Member
Aug 22, 2021
18,215
2,621
138
There is a direct connection and it can even be strictly formalized. The left cannot solve the problem on its own, so it is advantageous for him to obey and receive instructions from the center (fed's vertical). In exchange, he becomes loyal and turns into a slave and serve. This is his lifeline. If you give him independence and burden him with individual responsibility, he will not withstand competition and will go down the social ladder.

Therefore, the left trend and the decrease in IQ coincide.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
This is clearly seen in the difference between the right army of the American model and the left army of the Prussian model. From a professional military man, skill, experience and initiative are required, from the left recruit soldier, unquestioning obedience, discipline and lack of personal initiative are required.

In the 80s, US Marine Corps officers had an average IQ of over 130.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
The smarter and more capable the warrior, the more power they give him, the more stupid he is, the less power they give him. Instead of power, he receives orders from above. And so on all vertically. The officer of the left army also follows the instructions of higher ranks. This is essentially an official, not a military specialist.
 
There is a direct connection and it can even be strictly formalized.
Really? Got a link?

The left cannot solve the problem on its own, so it is advantageous for him to obey and receive instructions from the center (fed's vertical). In exchange, he becomes loyal and turns into a slave and serve. This is his lifeline. If you give him independence and burden him with individual responsibility, he will not withstand competition and will go down the social ladder.

Therefore, the left trend and the decrease in IQ coincide.
I don't see the numbers supporting you:
EJ26QVM555GETDUICSKYKKMJKQ.jpg
 
Hunter, Gather, Gardeners & Rudimentary farmers that spend over 90%+ of their awake time creating food & shelter can make it without much government.

But high tech farms & cities require large government so work consumes less than 30% of awake time allowing for 70%+ free time.
 
There is a direct connection and it can even be strictly formalized. The left cannot solve the problem on its own, so it is advantageous for him to obey and receive instructions from the center (fed's vertical). In exchange, he becomes loyal and turns into a slave and serve. This is his lifeline. If you give him independence and burden him with individual responsibility, he will not withstand competition and will go down the social ladder.

Therefore, the left trend and the decrease in IQ coincide.
I don't think I've seen any data that supports a high correlation between IQ and political affiliation. My non-scientific sense is there are other reasons that drive a person either to the Left or the Right politically like life experiences, personality, upbringing etc.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Hunter, Gather, Gardeners & Rudimentary farmers that spend over 90%+ of their awake time creating food & shelter can make it without much government.

But high tech farms & cities require large government so work consumes less than 30% of awake time allowing for 70%+ free time.
The point here is not whether there is a government, but how much initiative and freedom it gives you. The right-wing government will demand a solution to the problem, but will not dictate how to solve it and in what costume.
 
I don't think I've seen any data that supports a high correlation between IQ and political affiliation. My non-scientific sense is there are other reasons that drive a person either to the Left or the Right politically like life experiences, personality, upbringing etc.
There is a lot of evidence that the last decade has been accompanied by a large drop in IQ, and there has been less testing.
 
My non-scientific sense is there are other reasons that drive a person either to the Left or the Right politically like life experiences, personality, upbringing etc.
There actually can be many reasons that depend on delusions and demagogy. But still the slave mentality manifests itself. The left loves strong power and strict order, loves when he is put into range and loves when he does not differ from the masses, loves to serve and receive money for this and advance in his career.

We are considering a conceptual simplified model here. This is the meaning of the difference. In reality, it's more difficult.

But for a leftist person to live at the expense of society and to bear responsibility is always more profitable than to be responsible for his own actions.
 
The right woman, in order to start a family, needs to find a responsible man and create a strong marriage with sufficient income. It is enough for a left woman to spread her legs and receive benefits. The rest of the time she can drink whiskey

She does not need anything in order to do this, neither intelligence nor attractiveness nor effort.
 

The leftist or more liberal minded are less likely to accept religious superstitious beliefs. They can't reconcile religion with scientific fact.

Which side of the political spectrum would be more likely to believe in the 6000 year old earth theory?

Reading the link can take this discussion to a more suitable level than the kneejerk and profane nonsense some desire.
 
Last edited:

The leftist or more liberal minded are less likely to accept religious superstitious beliefs. They can't reconcile religion with scientific fact.

Which side of the political spectrum would be more likely to believe in the 6000 year old earth theory?
There is no "liberalism" in this sense, this is also left-wing nonsense. American freedom and the freedom of the French Revolution never meant the left "freedoms" of faggots and slaves.
 
Republicans are Low Information voters

That’s how Trump got elected
 
There is no "liberalism" in this sense, this is also left-wing nonsense. American freedom and the freedom of the French Revolution never meant the left "freedoms" of faggots and slaves.
Not suitable for a reply.

Moderator Alert!
 
There is a direct connection and it can even be strictly formalized. The left cannot solve the problem on its own, so it is advantageous for him to obey and receive instructions from the center (fed's vertical). In exchange, he becomes loyal and turns into a slave and serve. This is his lifeline. If you give him independence and burden him with individual responsibility, he will not withstand competition and will go down the social ladder.

Therefore, the left trend and the decrease in IQ coincide.
Oh boy, you really think you’re onto something don’t you?! Haha
 

Forum List

Back
Top