AmericanGirl05
Diamond Member
Even the Obama-appointed US Attorney is investigating this lot, including the current Mayor.
And you all know about Marion Barry.
Regret Your Vote Yet?
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
Even the Obama-appointed US Attorney is investigating this lot, including the current Mayor.
And you all know about Marion Barry.
- Thread starter
- #202
Remember this:
"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:
"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."
In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."
Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."
If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
The Daley Gator Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut
The Leftists on this board don't realize that a vote for any Liberal/Demcrat/Progressive is an endorsement of the suggestions Kagan makes, that free speech can be censored.
Obama said he "should have anticipated the optics" because "part of the job is the theater of it," conceding..(get ready to laugh).... "it's not something that comes naturally" to him.
Yeah, right
It absolutely is. "Theater" is spot-on. Because very little of what we engage in during campaigns is politics; rather, it's politics-theater. They play to an audience in search of applause lines, and forget about presenting a good story.
Who inhaled... who tied his dog to a car roof... who got a DWI.... who went to a black church.... enough pap already.
No regrets. I had to hold my nose to do it, but I voted for McCain as the lesser of two evils in 2008. And while I still think he is a liberal in conservative clothing, and that he would not have made a great President, he would have done infinitely less damage in the first four years than Obama has done. First and foremost we wouldn't be dealing with the most evil, expensive, counterproductive, and destructive piece of legislation ever forced upon the American people: Obamacare.
No regrets. Romney was not my first choice to be the GOP nominee, but after researching what he had accomplished with his life, I looked forward to voting for him in 2012. And I remain convinced that while he would be no more perfect and immune to error as any other President, we would be hugely more well off now had he won in 2012.
No regrets. Romney was not my first choice to be the GOP nominee, but after researching what he had accomplished with his life, I looked forward to voting for him in 2012. And I remain convinced that while he would be no more perfect and immune to error as any other President, we would be hugely more well off now had he won in 2012.
-- a nation that is completely a Liberal creation. You have a paradox.
Not that that's a surprise.
Regret your thread yet?
What you refer to as "Liberals".....modern Liberals....were created when John Dewey talked the socialists into changing their name.
Pick up a book for once.
I think you spelled Joe McCarthy's name wrong. Here, speaking of "books" you'll like this link. It's thirty pages long. Just imagine it's one of your posts and admire it in the mirror.
- Thread starter
- #206
"Character" is irrelevant to Liberals.
And, they use the aim of propriety of the Right against same....
"For example, since the Haves publicly pose as the custodians of responsibility, morality, law, and justice (which are frequently strangers to each others), they can be constantly pushed to live up to their own book of morality and regulations. No organizations, including organized religion, can live up to the letter of its own book. You can club them to death with their "book" of rules and regulations. This is what that great revolutionary, Paul of Tarsus, knew when he wrote to the Corinthians: "Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit, for the letter killeth." -- Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals, P.152
In fact....Liberals will vote for a rapist.......twice.
R.D.
Gold Member
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,445
- 2,585
- 245
Obama said he "should have anticipated the optics" because "part of the job is the theater of it," conceding..(get ready to laugh).... "it's not something that comes naturally" to him.
Yeah, right
It absolutely is. "Theater" is spot-on. Because very little of what we engage in during campaigns is politics; rather, it's politics-theater. They play to an audience in search of applause lines, and forget about presenting a good story.
Who inhaled... who tied his dog to a car roof... who got a DWI.... who went to a black church.... enough pap already.[/QUOTE]
Why am I not surprised you completely missed the point
AmericanGirl05
Diamond Member
And tell you they were morally justified in doing so. After all, it was just sex and the women were sluts.
- Thread starter
- #209
-- a nation that is completely a Liberal creation. You have a paradox.
Not that that's a surprise.
Regret your thread yet?
What you refer to as "Liberals".....modern Liberals....were created when John Dewey talked the socialists into changing their name.
Pick up a book for once.
I think you spelled Joe McCarthy's name wrong. Here, speaking of "books" you'll like this link. It's thirty pages long. Just imagine it's one of your posts and admire it in the mirror.
1. The link, like Liberalism, doesn't work.
2. Wise of you not to doubt that your brand of Liberal is really John Dewey's socialist.
3. Senator Joseph McCarthy....an American patriot and hero.
Another opportunity for you to 'pick up a book.'
boedicca
Uppity Water Nymph from the Land of Funk
- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,734
- 24,709
- 2,290
Whereas your ilk will dangle a strawman forever. The vast majority of us never heard of Paul Jablonsky until Glenn Beck dredged him up in 2008. Utterly irrelevant.
R.D.
Gold Member
- Feb 7, 2011
- 8,445
- 2,585
- 245
-- a nation that is completely a Liberal creation. You have a paradox.
Not that that's a surprise.
Regret your thread yet?
What you refer to as "Liberals".....modern Liberals....were created when John Dewey talked the socialists into changing their name.
Pick up a book for once.
I think you spelled Joe McCarthy's name wrong. Here, speaking of "books" you'll like this link. It's thirty pages long. Just imagine it's one of your posts and admire it in the mirror.
1. The link, like Liberalism, doesn't work.
2. Wise of you not to doubt that your brand of Liberal is really John Dewey's socialist.
3. Senator Joseph McCarthy....an American patriot and hero.
Another opportunity for you to 'pick up a book.'
Bullshit - there's nothing wrong with the link except the user going
Here, want me to read it aloud to you, helpless one?
One of the major problems in American political consciousness today comes from a misrepresentation of the political spectrum. This is partly the result of a deliberate effort to put all of America's enemies (fascists and communists) into the same basket after World War II, and a deliberate effort by the American "Right" to classify everything that they oppose as "Leftist". After World War II the Republican Party was struggling for survival and was in the process of reinventing itself. Part of the political strategy of some Republicans was to portray the Democratic Party of Truman and Franklin D. Roosevelt as "Red," thereby associating "Liberalism" with "Socialism". It was a common tactic during the 1950s to accuse Democrats of being "Communists" or "Communist sympathizers", a tactic that worked well during the McCarthy era and has had a lasting impact on how Americans view politics.
Please.
McCarthy was an asshole opportunist drunk womanizing demagogue poser liar, who fits like a glove here. And we've been over this before. The personification in fact of style over substance. And you're still buying. Gullible's Travels.
- Thread starter
- #214
Who?
"The vast majority of us never heard of .... Utterly irrelevant."
Surprise, surprise!
Usually it's only 90-95% of Liberals who despise knowledge so much that what ever they haven't heard of is "Utterly irrelevant."
I though you might have been in the 5%.....
Guess not.
Whoever, that's who. The point sailing blissfully over your pointy little head is that dredging up some obscure writer from decades ago and unilaterally declaring it to be the messiah of your opponent is a juvenile bullshit strawman and an utter failure of logic engaged in by the rhetorically bereft.
- Thread starter
- #217
"...dredging up some obscure writer from decades ago...."
If it is Saul Alinsky to whom you refer.....wipe the egg off your face.
Barack Obama (peace be on him) not only studied Alinsky....but he taught same.
"In 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College titled "There Is Only the Fight . . . ": An Analysis of the Alinsky Model. The subject was famed radical community organizerSaul Alinsky."
Hillary Rodham senior thesis - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
And.....
"Here is Saul Alinsky's dedication to his own book: “Lest we forget at least ... did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer "
Saul Alinsky s book Rules for Radicals dedicated to Lucifer - Catholic Answers Forums
- Thread starter
- #219
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
brainstorm question for light experiment- Started by trevorjohnson83
- Replies: 0
-
-
