rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 515
- 48
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
Ewww. A sensitive Jerry? What an ungodly perversion. I like it the way it is now. Dysfuntional trailer trash on parade.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
Ewww. A sensitive Jerry? What an ungodly perversion. I like it the way it is now. Dysfuntional trailer trash on parade.
Originally posted by Moi
I actually can't stand reality tv. All that survivor, fear factor and two dumb blondes...yuck. However, why would anyone care that it's on tv? If it wasn't successful than it wouldn't be on.
The tv comes with a channel changer and I can lock them so my son doesn't see anything I don't like- what's the point of limiting the choices. I happen to make sure my son watches commercial free tv...i hate all those commercials...and age-appropriate channels like disney, pbskids and noggin (daytime only- remember that thread!).
I do find it sad that with so much ability to do more, the mass of americans seems to congregate over shows like reality tv or the sopranos (which I find beneath contempt) but, hey, obviously I'm in the minority or they wouldn't still be on the tube.
Originally posted by Said1
Like I said, it was on at 3am, who the hell else was watching - aside from his present guestsYou could tell his heart wasn't in it.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
The popularity of reality tv, as it's called, is dismaying to liberal media elitists. But they're still sick to death that fox cashed in first, behind mtv, of course. The number one ingredient in 99% of all reality tv shows is competition. We all know liberals really don't understand competition; at least in the context of market forces, they're woefully ignorant. This competition, in turn, is what drives people to display the full gamut of human interaction in an effort to manipulate , compete with, and ally with each other.. These are real people, acting for the most part, how real people act. I must say however that most of the contestants are young, beautiful, vain, selfcentered, and volatile. Well adjusted people are just not as fun to watch. Who remembers Norman from season one of MTV's real world?
The libs will say: why this is no better than the base human urge to watch a train wreck and is therefore immoral. To them I say, "no, it's a fairly real unfoldment of real human emotion and drama". And then I ask"You look at train wrecks, don't you." Then they usually lie and say they don't.
Also, these shows are putting writers who usually write the shit dialogue, right out of business. Oh yeah, and those are liberal writers.
Originally posted by Bullypulpit
Yeah, it's dismaying alright. It's dismaying in its utter lack of any redeeming characteristics. It is as bad as anything the media has put out, and that's going some. It is the absolute nadir of media culture and, coupled with the rest of the dreck being put out by the other networks, it's a sad comentary on the state of our civilization.
It ain't political....it's just crap.
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
yes "research" I'm doing research today. Next week I'm on sabbatical.
"You mean vacation?"
NO. sabbatical. It means I'm smarter than you, and the benefits I provide to society are so great that I get credit for working while on vacation.
Originally posted by Said1
How do I get me one of them sabbaticals? Do you have to be Jewish![]()
Originally posted by rtwngAvngr
I don't think so, but you have to be a liberal academic, which are ruled by the jews, of course. So being jewish MAY help.![]()