Real estate market is collapsing in Moscow 🇷🇺 empire . PRICES !

...your idea of a good "investment" is to spend on your money not on pensions, heathcare and roads....but instead to use it to build bombs and tanks that end up blowing up while killing your own and foreign people?

200.gif
Yes. Those bombs are killing people who are killing us. So, if we want to survive to a pension, or raise children, or build roads we need, first of all, kill the enemies. We won't need pensions, healthcare or roads if we are dead.
 
Yes. Those bombs are killing people who are killing us. So, if we want to survive to a pension, or raise children, or build roads we need, first of all, kill the enemies. We won't need pensions, healthcare or roads if we are dead.
Nope, you don't need to do any of that.

All you idiots need to do is send your vankyas back home to their wife and kids and stop invading other countries. DUH.

Your young men will stop dying and getting wounded for nothing, drones will stop exploding in your cities, your energy exports will again be sold at market prices, you can stop spending on blowing stuff up and start spending more on your people's welfare.

What a crazy idea!
 
Last edited:
Nope, you don't need to do any of that.
Of course we need. If we don't kill them - they will kill us.
All you idiots need to do is send your vankyas back home to their wife and kids and stop invading other countries. DUH.

Your young men will stop dying and getting wounded for nothing, drones will stop exploding in your cities, your energy exports will again be sold at market prices, you can stop spending on blowing stuff up and start spending more on your people's welfare.

What a crazy idea!
Of course no. If we do not eliminate Kievan regime - NATO, for starters, will genocide local Russians. And then - NATO will invade Russia, burn our cities, rape our women, kill our children and take our land. Therfore - no, thank you very much. The only thing that stays between Russia and the fate of Iraq - it's our nukes and our determination to use them.
It's better to lose 1 mln young men in battle, than lose 100 mln of men, women and children in genocide.
 
Of course we need. If we don't kill them - they will kill us.

What the hel are you talking about?

Who will kill you if you simply return your millitary men from occupied territories and trenches to their families?

You think someone serously wants any of your nuclear weapon armed swamp?
 
WTF?

Who will kill you if you simply return your millitary men from occupied territories and trenches to their families?
NATO and their hired Ukrainian guns, of course.

What the hell are you talking about? You think someone serously wants any of your nuclear weapon armed swamp?
Yes. The only reason for NATO expansion and support of Ukrainian Nazies is the preparation to attack Russia and genocide us. No one supports Ukraine because of love to Ukrainians. They support Ukraine only because they hate Russians, want to kill us and take our lands.
 
NATO and their hired Ukrainian guns, of course.

So in your head: war-torn Ukraine, who has no nuclear weapons, will join NATO (a defensive alliance) and instead of rebuilding their country will then try to attack Russia.....who will immediately lay nuclear waste to Kiev.

Seriously? Thats what you seriously belive?

If so, you need to turn off that state TV as soon as possible, it has turned your brain into soup.
 
So in your head: war-torn Ukraine, who has no nuclear weapons, will join NATO (a defensive alliance) and then try to attack Russia who will immediately lay nuclear waste to Kiev?
Yes. NATO will try to use Ukrainian territory to launch an attack agaisnt Russia, and they simply don't care what will happen with Ukraine later.
Seriously? Thats what you seriously belive?
Yes.

If so, you need to turn off that TV as soon as possible, it has turned your brain into soup.
I don't watch TV. I read USMB, and that's why I believe that the large-scale war is almost inevitable. I mean that Russian TV can't depict Americans that stupid and aggressive as you depict yourself here.
 
Yes. NATO will try to use Ukrainian territory to launch an attack agaisnt Russia, and they simply don't care what will happen with Ukraine later.

NATO doesn't need Ukraine to launch an attack against Russia dummy, they can do it just fine from a number of other adjacent countries. All that ASIDE from NATO having zero such interest. Belive or not but people in NATO countrieas are not interested in nuclear wars.

Finland is 100 miles from st.Petersberg and you gave ZERO shit about it joining NATO, ZERO concern about NATO launching anything against Russia.

What you are posting are crazy rationalizations for invasion, not serious claims to security concerns.
 
NATO doesn't need Ukraine to launch an attack against Russia dummy, they can do it just fine from a number of other adjacent countries. All that ASIDE from NATO having zero such interest. Belive or not but people in NATO countrieas are not interested in nuclear wars.
Ok. I don't believe you (no offence). Anyway, even if you are not interested in the nuclear war per se, you are interested in the stealing russian resources and elimination of Russian people.
Finland is 100 miles from st.Petersberg and you gave ZERO shit about it joining NATO, ZERO concern about NATO launching anything against Russia.
Of course, we give a shit. But the first things first. We'll care about Finland, Sweden and Baltic states after Ukraine.

What you are posting are crazy rationalizations for invasion, not serious claims to security concerns.
If you really believe it, it means, as I said, the war is inevitable. Our demands about returning NATO's military infrastructure to 1997 borders are exactly about our security concerns
 
Ok. I don't believe you (no offence). Anyway, even if you are not interested in the nuclear war per se, you are interested in the stealing russian resources and elimination of Russian people.

Why the hell would anyone want elimination of Russian people or any other people? You are not right in the head.

What people want from Russians is to stop invading and killing others, start living like a civilized country - we want you to be peaceful, healthy and prosperous - each russian with a brand new iPhone in hand and a Tesla in your garage.

God knows Russians have the natural resources to live like Saudi kings, so maybe you should start asking your leaders why you don't.
 
Last edited:
you are interested in the stealing russian resources

On this point specifically, let me give you just an ounce of perspective:


Venezuela, a small country with no real means to stop any invasion, has over 4 times more oil in their proven reserves than Russia.


Now you know that and if you still think America has any interest in annexing countries for their resources, then you are just not right in the head.

America has no intrest in taking over any countries, least of all nuclear armed Russian swamplands. We have plenty of energy, plenty of land and plenty of money to buy anything Russia could ever offer.

America's long term interest are stable, peaceful, prosperous, stable democratic countries who's people can afford to buy our many products, services and technologies.
 
Last edited:
Why the hell would anyone want elimination of Russian people or any other people? You are not right in the head.
Basically, because you want to steal our resources. Second - because you want to "eliminate Russian threat". Third - because you are simply evil and Russophobic.

What people want from Russians is to stop invading and killing others, start living like a civilized country - we want you to be peaceful, healthy and prosperous.
You don't kill us - we don't kill you. You kill us - we kill you. So, we want to settle the peace on the terms of equal rights and equal safety. You don't.


God knows you have the natural resources to live like Saudi kings, so maybe you should start asking your leaders why you don't.
The answer is obvious - because the west is stealing our money.
 
On this point specifically, let me give you just an ounce of perspective:


Venezuela, a small country with no real means to stop any invasion, has over 4 times more oil in their proven reserves than Russia.
And it wasn't American goodwill, that so far is protecting Venezuela from American invasion, but Russian support.

If now that you know that and you still think America has any interest in annexing countries for their resources then you are not right in the head.

America has no intrest in taking over any countries, least of all nuclear armed Russian swamplands. We have plenty of energy. plenty of land and plenty of money to buy anything Russia could ever offer.

America's long term interest are stable, peaceful, prosperous, stable democratic countries who's people can afford to buy our many products, services and technologies.
Bla-bla-bla. And that is why America destroyed Iraq, Serbia, Libya, Syria and a lot of Latino-American countries? Is it why America hired Ukrainian Banderlogs? May be, repeating of your mantras makes you feel better, but its not convincing.
 
Of course, we give a shit. But the first things first. We'll care about Finland, Sweden and Baltic states after Ukraine.

No you won't, because at the end of the day you just need an excuse for your invasion.

Finland has no interest in any war with Russia, just like anyone else, Putin knows that well no matter what his state TV shits into the heads of his populace.
 
And it wasn't American goodwill, that so far is protecting Venezuela from American invasion, but Russian support.

Russia couldn't even defend Assad from internal rag-tag rebels and you think it could seriously protect Venezuela from America? :slap:

You are out of touch with reality and you prove that with your every post.
 
No you won't, because at the end of the day you just need an excuse for your invasion.
We'll see.

Finland has no interest in any war with Russia, just like anyone else, Putin knows that well no matter what his state TV shits into the heads of his populace.
Of course they have. If they were not interested in the war with Russia - they wouldn't join NATO and they wouldn't building military infrastructure for NATO's attack against Russia.
 
15th post
We'll see.


Of course they have. If they were not interested in the war with Russia - they wouldn't join NATO and they wouldn't building military infrastructure for NATO's attack against Russia.

They joined NATO because they realized they have a crazy, violent neighbor on their border that likes to invade other countries.

If Ukraine had the forsight Baltic countries did and joined NATO in the 90s/2000s then they wouldn't be burying so many of their sons today. They've learned who their "brothers" really are.
 
Russia couldn't even defend Assad from internal rag-tag rebels and you think it could seriously protect Venezuela from America? :slap:
They were not "internal rag-tag rebels". They are Turkish proxies. And yes, Russia could protect Venezuela.
 
They joined NATO because they realized they have a crazy, violent neighbor on their border that likes to invade other countries.
As if they weren't neighbours of the Russians for more than a thousand of years.

If Ukraine had the forsight Baltic countries did and joined NATO in the 90s/2000s then they wouldn't be burying so many of their sons today. They've learned who their "brothers" really are.
No. If Ukraine were trying to join NATO in 1990s - the war was started earlier. That's all.
 
Back
Top Bottom