Re-Paving The Highway To Hell

[Flanders]

Judi McLeod over at Canada Free Press hit on a theme that has been near and dear to my heart for many years:

In the massive loss of freedoms and individual rights of the population during President Barack Obama’s almost complete Fundamental Transformation of America, who would notice that leaders of the U.S. military are now working against We the People?

It isn’t the rank and file working against the people but some of their top Commanders.

XXXXX​

Many folk remember Petraeus for the embarrassing emails that outed his extra-marital affair with his own biographer when he should go down in history for welcoming the demise of the Constitution as a key anti-U.S. military figure in the globalist Council on Foreign Relations and the shadowy Bilderberg network.

XXXXX​

The Democrats, who fought against Petraeus when he was defending the Iraq surge in 2007, got it wrong when they dubbed him ‘Betray-Us’ because when it comes to guarding America’s sovereignty, he’s Judas.

Military Leaders Turning Against We the People?
By Judi McLeod August 12, 2014

Military Leaders Turning Against We the People?
​

General Odierno is another one who swore to:

“. . . support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; . . .”

I’m sure if they are asked every one of them could justify working to abolish the Constitution so global government can end wars, blah, blah, blah. If you read this article about Odierno and the Council on Foreign Affairs you’ll find this written for the CFR in 1974:

The ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up, rather than the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than a frontal assault. Richard N. Gardner​

Today, we see this being done by Democrats, NGOs, and Establishment Republicans on a daily basis.

CFR Ramping UP
Michael Oberndorf, RPA Saturday, June 9, 2012

CFR Ramping Up​

Colin Powell preceded Petraeus and the others by decades. Years ago I said that Powell was the first UN-loyalist to make it all the way to the top. He is certainly the most successful “security risk” Senator McCarthy warned about. General Dempsey, Admiral Locklear, General Odierno, and only the good Lord knows how many others are still in uniform —— occupying the upper ranks of every military branch.

To no one’s surprise the MSM praises UN-loyalists to high heaven. After all, they are not Benedict Arnold working for an enemy government —— contemporary traitors betray the country to an organization and to an ideology that is repugnant to must Americans; so who would dare challenge the loyalty of a man wearing a chest full of ribbons?

NOTE: Membership in the United Nations means that no civilian or military man betraying this country on the UN’s behalf can be prosecuted for treason.

The first warning

It’s illogical to think that global government advocates did not infiltrate the office corps in every branch of the armed services since the UN came into existence 69 years ago. Throughout those seven decades influential Communists posing as Democrats would certainly have advanced the careers of those officers who believed in global government even though such men and women may not have been card-carrying UN-loving Communists themselves. The three branches of government were infiltrated by traitors as far back as FDR’s administrations. Infiltrating the military began after WWII ended.

Socialists/Communists, and global government traitors, are now staff officers in every branch of the armed services. Loyal officers are being purged. Their replacements are more loyal to the United Nations than they are to the United States. I have to admit that I was never able to determine if global government traitors in the military constitute the majority. I’m beginning to believe they do.

Parenthetically, five or six years ago there was talk about closing the service academies. Democrats hate anything that strengthens duty, honor, country in the officer corps. Purging the military of loyal officers is an incremental substitute until the service academies can be transformed into United Nations institutions or closed.

The federal government, and the US military, were thoroughly infiltrated by the very type of person the country was warned about in the Army-McCarthy hearings (1954). Unfortunately, one type of infiltrator in the military escaped detection until recently. Nobody, myself included, separated hardcore Communists from global government traitors who might not be Communists.

Ultimately, hardcore Socialists/Communists and global government traitors serve the New World Order; so the distinction between the two groups is slowly evaporating.

NOTE: Every now and then getting out of the United Nations is suggested by a public voice. Obviously, it never gets off the ground. Ron Paul’s American Sovereignty Restoration Act first introduced in 1997 dies on the vine every time it is reintroduced.

Universal Code of Military Justice

One thing can be done to protect enlisted personnel. Change the Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) so that no American can be ordered to fight for the UN. Make the change so ironclad that military personnel will have every Right to refuse such an order without fear of being punished. The commander and chief alone can change the UCMJ so that no enlisted man or woman can be ordered to serve the United Nations in any capacity. I’d go so far as to dishonorably discharge every OFFICER who issues such an order. Naturally, such a change to the UCMJ requires a commander in chief loyal to the Constitution. I cannot see one presidential wannabe with that kind of loyalty or courage. What I do see is the US military implementing liberalism’s touchy-feely global government garbage.

Bottom line: Americans should only fight to defend their country against clearly-defined menaces like Islamic fundamentalism (think 9/11) and Communist expansion by force (think Korea and Vietnam) rather than being manipulated into jousting against a philosophical threat. When Americans do go to war they should fight a total war and to hell with the enemy’s feelings.

Bet the family jewels on this: China’s, Russia’s, and Islam’s militaries will not be fighting for the United Nations when the shooting starts, while the dirty little moralists running our country will not fight for anything else. They truly believe that their moral superiority is more powerful than military superiority. Tragically, traitors are convinced that their worldview will win the day over militaries fighting for their countries and no nonsense about it. It would be poetic justice if Muslims decapitated them first. (The rest of us could then re-pave the highway to hell with their bones.)

Let me close with a rebuttal. According to lip readers Michelle said “All this for a damn flag." The commander in chief nods in agreement:

​

My rebuttal is not an attempt to wrap myself in the flag, but simply to point out that American quislings have nothing to match love of country —— or anything else —— that this inspires:

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8OEKehKB3J4"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8OEKehKB3J4[/ame]​

 

[regent]

If we do have generals that talk of betraying the US, their oath and the Constitution get rid of them. I realize that they train all their lives for a war, a war a few may see as way to gain some fame. But the fame should be for their military exploits not making American into a banana republic.

 

[Flanders]

If we do have generals that talk of betraying the US, their oath and the Constitution get rid of them. I realize that they train all their lives for a war, a war a few may see as way to gain some fame. But the fame should be for their military exploits not making American into a banana republic.

To regent: Do I sense some agreement with my OP!

 

[regent]

If we do have generals that talk of betraying the US, their oath and the Constitution get rid of them. I realize that they train all their lives for a war, a war a few may see as way to gain some fame. But the fame should be for their military exploits not making American into a banana republic.

To regent: Do I sense some agreement with my OP!

I doubt it. I'm not much into the conspiracy thing, communism was never a great fear, so those that saw every third American as a communist because they thought differently were, and are, a bother.

 

[Flanders]

Parenthetically, five or six years ago there was talk about closing the service academies. Democrats hate anything that strengthens duty, honor, country in the officer corps. Purging the military of loyal officers is an incremental substitute until the service academies can be transformed into United Nations institutions or closed.

I recall talk about abolishing America’s military service academies as far back as 1994. It’s back again. The true reason is never mentioned every time it comes up. This article is the same as the others:

Abolish West Point — and the other service academies, too
By Scott Beauchamp

Abolish West Point and the other service academies too - The Washington Post​

The truth is: The global government crowd has always sought military officers loyal to the president —— not to the Constitution, and never to the country. Taqiyya the Liar’s recent purges among military officers is very much a part of the same political philosophy so alien to Duty. Honor. Country.

​

 

[regent]

[QUOTE="MacArthur made some right decisions and a good quote. One, was to resign after disobeying, and two, when he said the framers of the Constitution were liberals.

"Stick with Mac and never get back."

 

[Flanders]

This excerpt does not prove my case:

It’s illogical to think that global government advocates did not infiltrate the office corps in every branch of the armed services since the UN came into existence 69 years ago. Throughout those seven decades influential Communists posing as Democrats would certainly have advanced the careers of those officers who believed in global government even though such men and women may not have been card-carrying UN-loving Communists themselves. The three branches of government were infiltrated by traitors as far back as FDR’s administrations. Infiltrating the military began after WWII ended.

Socialists/Communists, and global government traitors, are now staff officers in every branch of the armed services. Loyal officers are being purged. Their replacements are more loyal to the United Nations than they are to the United States. I have to admit that I was never able to determine if global government traitors in the military constitute the majority. I’m beginning to believe they do.

but this letter is certainly circumstantial evidence:

An open letter from retired generals supporting the Iran nuclear deal was coordinated with help from the White House, according to emails reviewed by the Free Beacon.

The pro-deal letter to Congress, signed by three-dozen retired senior officers and released on Tuesday, has been seized on by supporters of the Iran agreement as evidence of a “growing consensus” backing the Obama administration’s position.

White House Played Role in Iran Deal Letter Signed by Former Flag Officers
Pro-deal letter part of lobbying effort from Obama admin on Iran deal
By: Alana Goodman
August 14, 2015 2:40 pm

White House Played Role in Iran Deal Letter Signed by Former Flag Officers Washington Free Beacon​

 

[Flanders]

Everything General Dunford says binds this country tighter to the United Nations. “. . . our collective legitimacy . . .” is clearly treason coming from a high-ranking military officer:

"I think it's clear to all of us that the U.N.'s record ... has been mixed," the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said. "But while many of the challenges are due to the nature of the conflicts, there's other challenges that should concern us all. Problems of ill-disciplined units conducting criminal acts, including sexual assault, problems with corruption and shortfalls in equipment, cannot be blamed on the environment."

Such problems "threaten our collective legitimacy and our effectiveness," he warned. "To much of the world's populations, a soldier or policeman wearing a blue helmet and a U.N. patch represents their last best hope for safety and security, and we must work to ensure that image and hope isn't diminished."

Dunford to U.N.: Control your peacekeepers better
By Nicole Duran
6/17/16 7:25 PM

Dunford to U.N.: Control your peacekeepers better​

Note that Dunford’s predecessor was no better:

​

 

[anotherlife]

Obama or not, global government is coming. And you do want to be a nation on their list. If you are not on their list, then you will be sold, piece by piece.

 

[Flanders]

Obama or not, global government is coming. And you do want to be a nation on their list. If you are not on their list, then you will be sold, piece by piece.

To anotherlife: First off, the people you defend are selling something they do not own. They will have to disarm the American people before they finalize the sale.

In any event the pendulum is swinging against a one government world no matter how Brexit turns out next week:

The Chicago sewer rat is sticking his nose in Brexit because it gives the British people the authority to decide the matter of sovereignty. It is the vote itself, not the outcome, that he fears the most. Even if the Brits vote for the EU the American people might start demanding a referendum on getting out of the United Nations. That is one vote American traitors do not want to see.

XXXXX​

Should the UK bail out of the EU the United Nations crowd will go nuts.

The Best Elizabeth​

 

[anotherlife]

Obama or not, global government is coming. And you do want to be a nation on their list. If you are not on their list, then you will be sold, piece by piece.

To anotherlife: First off, the people you defend are selling something they do not own. They will have to disarm the American people before they finalize the sale.

In any event the pendulum is swinging against a one government world no matter how Brexit turns out next week:

The Chicago sewer rat is sticking his nose in Brexit because it gives the British people the authority to decide the matter of sovereignty. It is the vote itself, not the outcome, that he fears the most. Even if the Brits vote for the EU the American people might start demanding a referendum on getting out of the United Nations. That is one vote American traitors do not want to see.

XXXXX​

Should the UK bail out of the EU the United Nations crowd will go nuts.

The Best Elizabeth​

The disarming of the American people has been completed effectively. There is no way you buy more ammo than the Feds, and then you haven't even considered the drones yet. The chain reaction you are describing may be scary to some power politicians, but the underlying money and financial networks will not be less in control.

 

[Flanders]

The disarming of the American people has been completed effectively. There is no way you buy more ammo than the Feds, and then you haven't even considered the drones yet. The chain reaction you are describing may be scary to some power politicians, but the underlying money and financial networks will not be less in control.

To anotherlife: You are downplaying the advantage in numbers. Tens of millions of armed Americans, in addition to the first loyalty of many in the military, and law enforcement, who will not kill fellow Americans on orders from traitors.

 

[ogibillm]

wow. you guys worried about jade helm?

 

[whitehall]

The Founding Fathers of United States of America risked their lives and fortunes to create the concept of freedom and government of the people that most nations of what we used to call the "free world" enjoy today. The only way Americans can lose freedom is to vote it away. Thanks to the sub-standard basic public education in the U.S., most High School graduates not to mention college grads can't name even one Founding Father or even name one or two Amendments in the Bill of Rights. When the liberal media enters the picture and becomes the propaganda arm of liberal democrat administrations, any affront to freedom and the Constitution is possible and gross misinterpretations of the Bill of Rights are likely. You can find the truth if you work hard enough but for the most part the media writes the history books and the liberal media has been very kind to military leaders who cooperate with liberal democrat administrations.

 

[anotherlife]

The disarming of the American people has been completed effectively. There is no way you buy more ammo than the Feds, and then you haven't even considered the drones yet. The chain reaction you are describing may be scary to some power politicians, but the underlying money and financial networks will not be less in control.

To anotherlife: You are downplaying the advantage in numbers. Tens of millions of armed Americans, in addition to the first loyalty of many in the military, and law enforcement, who will not kill fellow Americans on orders from traitors.

Why is that? The Wyatt Earp movie has already portrayed Americans killing their own cousins in the civil war.

 

[Flanders]

The Founding Fathers of United States of America risked their lives and fortunes to create the concept of freedom and government of the people that most nations of what we used to call the "free world" enjoy today.

To whitehall: Basically, the earliest Americans were led by the Founding Fathers. They all first fought for national sovereignty. Individual liberties only came after the WAR FOR INDEPENDENCE ended. That was probably the only war when politicians actually won the peace, too.

Today’s ruling class somehow believe that they, and they alone, are the heirs to hard won independence; hence, in their minds it is not treason when they give away their ‘property.’

Note that United Nations-loving traitors who would give away our sovereignty never admit they are surrendering every American’s individual liberty into the bargain.

Why is that? The Wyatt Earp movie has already portrayed Americans killing their own cousins in the civil war.

To anotherlife: Your point escapes me.

In any event, Americans you criticize are our sons-of bitched. The global government you predict will always be everybody else’s sons-of-bitches.

Perhaps you can tell me why any American should willing give the people who will administer a global government a smidgeon of authority over their lives? Open-borders and United Nations refugees might slow you down a bit, but give it a try.

Take this one to the bank. People living in countries less free than Americans will become less free under a global government. It is ludicrous to think that American traitors would take away our freedoms so they can free the rest of the world.

Conversely, every other major country will fight like hell before they give away anything.

 

[defcon4]

To anotherlife: You are downplaying the advantage in numbers. Tens of millions of armed Americans, in addition to the first loyalty of many in the military, and law enforcement, who will not kill fellow Americans on orders from traitors.

They always do.

 

[anotherlife]

The Founding Fathers of United States of America risked their lives and fortunes to create the concept of freedom and government of the people that most nations of what we used to call the "free world" enjoy today.

To whitehall: Basically, the earliest Americans were led by the Founding Fathers. They all first fought for national sovereignty. Individual liberties only came after the WAR FOR INDEPENDENCE ended. That was probably the only war when politicians actually won the peace, too.

Today’s ruling class somehow believe that they, and they alone, are the heirs to hard won independence; hence, in their minds it is not treason when they give away their ‘property.’

Note that United Nations-loving traitors who would give away our sovereignty never admit they are surrendering every American’s individual liberty into the bargain.

Why is that? The Wyatt Earp movie has already portrayed Americans killing their own cousins in the civil war.

To anotherlife: Your point escapes me.

In any event, Americans you criticize are our sons-of bitched. The global government you predict will always be everybody else’s sons-of-bitches.

Perhaps you can tell me why any American should willing give the people who will administer a global government a smidgeon of authority over their lives? Open-borders and United Nations refugees might slow you down a bit, but give it a try.

Take this one to the bank. People living in countries less free than Americans will become less free under a global government. It is ludicrous to think that American traitors would take away our freedoms so they can free the rest of the world.

Conversely, every other major country will fight like hell before they give away anything.

I agree that anything under American rule is more free than what will be under the one world government. But it is also true, that Americans have already fought wars for people who took large parts of American freedom away. And the German Bismarck is right, no nation is more oppressed than the one that falsely believes to be free. The USA is fast becoming one of these if not already is. And the other countries will not fight against the one world global government control, except the ones that were taken off the map or mostly taken off the map, for the purpose of such remote global control. So, America will not be united in this effort.

 

[RoccoR]

anotherlife, et al,

Well, there no real single approach to this dilemma --- and there is no "set" of adaptable theories that grant some reasonable expectation of a solution.

I agree that anything under American rule is more free than what will be under the one world government. But it is also true, that Americans have already fought wars for people who took large parts of American freedom away. And the German Bismarck is right, no nation is more oppressed than the one that falsely believes to be free. The USA is fast becoming one of these if not already is. And the other countries will not fight against the one world global government control, except the ones that were taken off the map or mostly taken off the map, for the purpose of such remote global control. So, America will not be united in this effort.

(COMMENT)

Yes, this is very much like those optical illusions that look so real, but remain impossible on close examination.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Flanders]

I agree that anything under American rule is more free than what will be under the one world government. But it is also true, that Americans have already fought wars for people who took large parts of American freedom away.

To anotherlife: Which wars are you talking about? As far as I know, Americans never fought a war for people in foreign lands. The Korean War, the Vietnam War, and the war against Islam that Muslims started, were fought in defense of this country. Americans lost some freedoms in those wars for precise reasons:

1. The Korean War was fought to stop Communism’s expansion. The tragedy is that it was a United Nations war that traitors never wanted to win. No war can be won when the strategy is Peace Without Victory.

2. The Vietnam War was fought for the same reason as the Korean War. Notice that the United Nations did not approve of the Vietnam War. The American Left gave the country all-out defeat in the Vietnam War.

3. Not only will traitors give their country another military defeat in the war against Islam, they will not fight it after having snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.

And the German Bismarck is right, no nation is more oppressed than the one that falsely believes to be free. The USA is fast becoming one of these if not already is.

To anotherlife: I would not be so quick to cite Bismark. His Second Reich gave Germany the Third Reich.

And the other countries will not fight against the one world global government control, except the ones that were taken off the map or mostly taken off the map, for the purpose of such remote global control.

To anotherlife: I do not know what “. . . taken off the map. . .” means.

The more the merrier as far as the United Nations is concerned. The United Nations’ goal is to acquire the same governing powers over every national government that our federal government exercises over our states; i.e., taxation, laws, education, and, of curse, dictating the behavior of every individual. In short: OBEDIENCE. In simple terms the United Nations will post this slogan over every global government building:

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/03/video-undefined-22D034E600000578-783_636x358.jpg

Working for the government is the exact opposite of the freedom to work for one’s self —— which charity hustlers vehemently oppose.

So, America will not be united in this effort.

To anotherlife: This will always unite a free people willing to fight to remain free:

https://tse2.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.Mbd5a9dc2eea75931b07ad439340d9936H0&pid=Api&w=240&h=181

Liberty or Laws?
By Gary Hunt
June 18, 2016

Liberty or Laws?​