Rangel's Tragic End

[Moon]

that was hilarious
wasnt it
LOL

It was. The same black conservative woman is also bisexual...and she was told by a leftist lesbian that she isn't gay enough.

Now you're just full of shit and making shit up.

Actually, he's not.

 

[boedicca]

Well, if they're conservatives, they're not really black, donchaknow.

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

 

[Synthaholic]

OJ made it to trial
Delay's case was dropped


ham sandwich indictments usually are

DeLay is on trial RIGHT NOW! ****! Do you act like this on purpose?

Posted at 10:20 PM ET, 11/18/2010
Mulligans: At Tom DeLay trial, hammer nails himself
By Dana Milbank

***

In the Tom DeLay trial in Texas, the former House Republican whip's defense lawyer introduced DeLay's calendar into evidence to prove that DeLay did not meet with political aide Jim Ellis during a crucial period in 2002 when an alleged money laundering scheme occurred. But during cross-examination, prosecutors revealed that DeLay's lawyer had overlooked a meeting DeLay had with Ellis just two hours after Ellis received the $190,000 check used in the alleged scheme. "I just missed that one," DeLay's lawyer explained.​

So: they both went to trial. Do you want to retract your "FAIL" comment, or try to come up with something else?

bullshit

where did you find that from?
i know he had one minor charge still pending but all the rest were dropped

Is you Google broken?

tom Delay trial - Google Search

so you still have a FAIL asswipe

What a piece of shit you are. You don't bother to even check to see if DeLay is on trial or not - you just call me a liar instead, and question where I got it from?

Tell me again how you are fair-minded and not a totally partisan hack, DiveCon.

If you had any integrity, you would retract and apologize.

 

[Synthaholic]

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

That's not what daveman said. He said "They really believe that shit". Not one monolithic case.

 

[boedicca]

You are wrong; but that does seem to be your comfort zone.

 

[DiveCon]

DeLay is on trial RIGHT NOW! ****! Do you act like this on purpose?

Posted at 10:20 PM ET, 11/18/2010
Mulligans: At Tom DeLay trial, hammer nails himself
By Dana Milbank

***

In the Tom DeLay trial in Texas, the former House Republican whip's defense lawyer introduced DeLay's calendar into evidence to prove that DeLay did not meet with political aide Jim Ellis during a crucial period in 2002 when an alleged money laundering scheme occurred. But during cross-examination, prosecutors revealed that DeLay's lawyer had overlooked a meeting DeLay had with Ellis just two hours after Ellis received the $190,000 check used in the alleged scheme. "I just missed that one," DeLay's lawyer explained.​

So: they both went to trial. Do you want to retract your "FAIL" comment, or try to come up with something else?

bullshit

where did you find that from?
i know he had one minor charge still pending but all the rest were dropped

Is you Google broken?

tom Delay trial - Google Search

so you still have a FAIL asswipe

What a piece of shit you are. You don't bother to even check to see if DeLay is on trial or not - you just call me a liar instead, and question where I got it from?

Tell me again how you are fair-minded and not a totally partisan hack, DiveCon.

If you had any integrity, you would retract and apologize.

because you ARE a liar

and posting a google search results is bullshit too

 

[thereisnospoon]

Well, if they're conservatives, they're not really black, donchaknow.

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

In your world wealthy black people are "not black enough"?
Is that ever a racist assessment.
Is it your assertion that in order for a black person to be a true black person they must live in the 'hood?
Such shit we read here.

 

[daveman]

Well, if they're conservatives, they're not really black, donchaknow.

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

You really SUCK at analogies, don't you?

I'll answer your stupid little question when you explain what your stupid little story has to do with Christopher, a white middle-class liberal from NYC, saying he's blacker than Taylor, a black middle-class conservative from Miami.

The point you're missing (deliberately or not...after all, you're pretty stupid) is the politics involved. Christopher claims blackhood due to his liberal politics, not due to his or Taylor's economic circumstances. Dumbass.

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

I won't be holding my breath. Dumbass.

 

[daveman]

that was hilarious
wasnt it
LOL

It was. The same black conservative woman is also bisexual...and she was told by a leftist lesbian that she isn't gay enough.

Now you're just full of shit and making shit up.

Nope. The lesbian was Celeste Chalfonte.

You see, I don't have to make up shit to make leftists look bad. You morons do it all on your own. And your ineffectual, whiny butthurt does nothing to change the fact.

Dumbass.

 

[daveman]

Are you honest enough to answer the question? You failed the first one - try again.

It doesn't matter what I think. It matters what the Ethics Committee thinks...and the facts showed them that Rangel acted in an unethical manner.

Rangel appreciates your desperate spin, but slavish anonymous hero-worship on the internet won't do him much good. If you're so convinced of his innocence, send some cash to his defense fund.

But you won't.

You tell us what you think on every other subject...

Really? What is my opinion going to change? If I pronounce him guilty, will he be perp-walked out of the House? If I pronounce him innocent, will he be restored to his committee chair?

I don't have that kind of power. I don't know why you think I do.

Dumbass.

...until I call you out for your partisanship and lockstep criticism of anything Democrat.

I knew you couldn't be honest, then I proved it with this.

That's rich, coming from a guy who is utterly incapable of criticizing Democrats.

Dumbass.

 

[daveman]

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

According to liberals...there is.

That's what happens when you live your life by identity politics. Everyone gets pigeonholed. And when someone dares to step out of the little box rigidly defined by liberals, they are attacked. "You're not black enough." "You're not gay enough." And the ever-popular "Uncle Tom!!"

 

[daveman]

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

That's not what daveman said. He said "They really believe that shit". Not one monolithic case.

"They" as in liberals. I just illustrated what happens when individuals step out of the box liberals put them in.

You will, predictably, deny it happens. But you will be, predictably, wrong.

Dumbass.

 

[pencilitin]

If you don't play by the rules, the rules will play you back...

 

[daveman]

If you don't play by the rules, the rules will play you back...

If you don't play by liberals' rules, they will try to destroy you.

 

[The T]

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

According to liberals...there is.

That's what happens when you live your life by identity politics. Everyone gets pigeonholed. And when someone dares to step out of the little box rigidly defined by liberals, they are attacked. "You're not black enough." "You're not gay enough." And the ever-popular "Uncle Tom!!"

Very few of them have the heart to tell their masters holding thier leashes to **** off.

 

[The T]

Another arrogant Statist neutered. Next up? Maxine 'The Mouth' Waters.
But look for a larger fight than what Rangle fronted.

Yea, we certainly don't need anyone in Congress who has the courage to stand up for the people. We need more fascist like you who stand up for dirty energy polluters that kill our kids, and multinational corporations who get welfare that taxpayers are stuck paying...


"Harry Truman once said, 'There are 14 or 15 million Americans who have the resources to have representatives in Washington to protect their interests, and that the interests of the great mass of the other people - the 150 or 160 million - is the responsibility of the president of the United States, and I propose to fulfill it.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Nice platititudes Bufu...but you have it backwards asswipe. The people run the show. When will you get it straight?

 

[daveman]

To answer your nonsensical question requires believing that there is One Monolithic Black Experience in the U.S.

According to liberals...there is.

That's what happens when you live your life by identity politics. Everyone gets pigeonholed. And when someone dares to step out of the little box rigidly defined by liberals, they are attacked. "You're not black enough." "You're not gay enough." And the ever-popular "Uncle Tom!!"

Very few of them have the heart to tell their masters holding thier leashes to **** off.

More and more every day, thankfully.

 

[Big Fitz]

Someone remind me once again what's tragic about this?

I see it as more of a comedy of errors, manners and morality tale where good triumphs over evil.

 

[Synthaholic]

Indeed.

On another board, I watched a white liberal tell a black conservative that he knew more about "the black experience" than she did.

They really believe that shit.

So if Oprah had a daughter who grew up in the lap of luxury, flying private jets everywhere, taking limos everywhere, eating in only the finest restaurants, never mingling with the masses or anyone who was below her station in life, and she was a conservative (naturally), then . . .

SHE would still know more about the Black experience than a middle-aged White guy who had spent his adult life running inner-city youth centers, or homeless shelters, or been in the social services, etc.

Is that your logic?

I predict that you will deflect, and not answer this question directly and truthfully. Prove me wrong.

In your world wealthy black people are "not black enough"?
Is that ever a racist assessment.
Is it your assertion that in order for a black person to be a true black person they must live in the 'hood?
Such shit we read here.

No, the subject was the "Black Experience", not racial authenticity.

 

[Synthaholic]

You are wrong; but that does seem to be your comfort zone.

I am not wrong.