otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 46,802
- 15,663
- 2,165
The common denominator here is conservative simplicist thinking.
a. Yes, President Barack Hussein Obama supports a Pro-Choice position. Being Pro-Choice doesn't mean death, unless your a idiot conservative.
b. Conservatives with the nra own mass gun violence in America and the Parkland Student will keep hammering that home.
c. President Barack Hussein Obama greatly slowed Irans march to Nuclear capability with the agreement they signed. Iran is still living to that agreement and it represents the only thing slowing them down. The world's worst state sponser of terrorism is either Russia, North Korea or Saudi Arabia and trump bends to their wishes.
"a. Yes, President Barack Hussein Obama supports a Pro-Choice position. Being Pro-Choice doesn't mean death, unless your a idiot conservative."
1. He supported leaving a child, born of a botched abortion attempt, to die.
2. nĀ·fanĀ·tiĀ·cide/inĖfantiĖsÄ«d/
Noun:
The practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.
3. "Gingrich was presumably referencing Obamaās opposition to Illinoisā proposed version of a āborn aliveā law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obamaās explanations as to why he did not support the āborn aliveā legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch
a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committeeās 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and āInfanticideā
4. If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.
5. Now, lest anyone believe that there is a nuanced explanation that would be acceptable to normal people....consider the fact that President Obama appointed Professor Peter Singer as his heathcare advisor.
Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators : I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story & Experience
http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290
a. "Singer once wrote, "because people are human does not mean that their lives are more valuable than animals." He not only advocates abortion but also killing disabled babies up to 28 days after they are born. In his book "Practical Ethics," he wrote, "When the death of a disabled infant will lead to the birth of another infant with better prospects of a happy life, the total amount of happiness will be greater if the disabled infant is killed.... Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Often, it is not wrong at all."
Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Cambridge University Press, 1979, p. 191.
So...did Obama have a cavalier attitude about killing infants?
Would you appoint anyone who advises killing infants?....Obama did.
Was Gingrich correct?
Seems indisputable.
__________________
http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/l...on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
Pay special attention to the vid @ :50
"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."
2:01
2:40
3:55
5:28
Did you understand that, blotto?????
I understand that the fact check article that you provided doesn't support your misstatement of President Barack Hussein Obama's position.
Why is that?
"We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committeeās 2003 mark-up session."
I caught you in a lie, huh?
The only lie here is from your selective picking of your evidence.
From Politifact (article that you sourced).
"Gingrich was presumably referencing Obamaās opposition to Illinoisā proposed version of a āborn aliveā law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion.
The common denominator here is conservative simplicist thinking.
a. Yes, President Barack Hussein Obama supports a Pro-Choice position. Being Pro-Choice doesn't mean death, unless your a idiot conservative.
b. Conservatives with the nra own mass gun violence in America and the Parkland Student will keep hammering that home.
c. President Barack Hussein Obama greatly slowed Irans march to Nuclear capability with the agreement they signed. Iran is still living to that agreement and it represents the only thing slowing them down. The world's worst state sponser of terrorism is either Russia, North Korea or Saudi Arabia and trump bends to their wishes.
"a. Yes, President Barack Hussein Obama supports a Pro-Choice position. Being Pro-Choice doesn't mean death, unless your a idiot conservative."
1. He supported leaving a child, born of a botched abortion attempt, to die.
2. nĀ·fanĀ·tiĀ·cide/inĖfantiĖsÄ«d/
Noun:
The practice in some societies of killing unwanted children soon after birth.
3. "Gingrich was presumably referencing Obamaās opposition to Illinoisā proposed version of a āborn aliveā law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion....FactCheck.org found holes in Obamaās explanations as to why he did not support the āborn aliveā legislation..."
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch - Naureen Khan - NationalJournal.com
FACT CHECK: Gingrich Claim on Obama Infanticide Vote A Stretch
a. "Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committeeās 2003 mark-up session."
FactCheck.org : Obama and āInfanticideā
4. If a child is 'accidentally' born alive as a result of a botched abortion attempt, Senator Obama had no problem allowing that newborn to die, sans any medical attention.
5. Now, lest anyone believe that there is a nuanced explanation that would be acceptable to normal people....consider the fact that President Obama appointed Professor Peter Singer as his heathcare advisor.
Peter Singer Joins Obama's Health Care Administrators : I Am Not a Fan of Peter Singer Story & Experience
http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Am-Not-A-Fan-Of-Peter-Singer/657290
a. "Singer once wrote, "because people are human does not mean that their lives are more valuable than animals." He not only advocates abortion but also killing disabled babies up to 28 days after they are born. In his book "Practical Ethics," he wrote, "When the death of a disabled infant will lead to the birth of another infant with better prospects of a happy life, the total amount of happiness will be greater if the disabled infant is killed.... Killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Often, it is not wrong at all."
Peter Singer, "Practical Ethics," Cambridge University Press, 1979, p. 191.
So...did Obama have a cavalier attitude about killing infants?
Would you appoint anyone who advises killing infants?....Obama did.
Was Gingrich correct?
Seems indisputable.
__________________
http://www.jillstanek.com/2008/02/l...on-illinois-born-alive-infant-protection-act/
Pay special attention to the vid @ :50
"...if a baby is born alive after a late term abortion, we can throw it away...Barack Obama approved that..."
2:01
2:40
3:55
5:28
Did you understand that, blotto?????
I understand that the fact check article that you provided doesn't support your misstatement of President Barack Hussein Obama's position.
Why is that?
"We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committeeās 2003 mark-up session.
According to Politifact, an independent fact-checking organization that looked into similar claims made by former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum on the campaign trail, Obama voiced his opposition to the new legislation as a state senator because it would have given legal status to fetuses and would thus have been struck down by the courts, and because Illinois already had laws to ensure infants who survived abortions would be given medical attention.
FactCheck.org found holes in Obamaās explanations as to why he did not support the āborn aliveā legislation. However, by opposing the bill, Obama was not voting to legalize infanticide (as Gingrich said) or to prevent doctors from giving infants medical attention.
"
I caught you in a lie, huh?
Not according to the Politifact article that YOU cited.
So sorry, blotto.....
You've had your three strikes....and you know what that means.
Another notch on my belt.
The only notch seems to be the ever widening of the space between you and facts.
From the article that YOU provided which reinforces your ablility to present facts is faulty.
"Gingrich was presumably referencing Obamaās opposition to Illinoisā proposed version of a āborn aliveā law, intended to require doctors to administer immediate medical care to any infant that survived an intended abortion.
According to Politifact, an independent fact-checking organization that looked into similar claims made by former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum on the campaign trail, Obama voiced his opposition to the new legislation as a state senator because it would have given legal status to fetuses and would thus have been struck down by the courts, and because Illinois already had laws to ensure infants who survived abortions would be given medical attention.
FactCheck.org found holes in Obamaās explanations as to why he did not support the āborn aliveā legislation. However, by opposing the bill, Obama was not voting to legalize infanticide (as Gingrich said) or to prevent doctors from giving infants medical attention."
So you have that.
Well and the fact Politifact rated santuroums statement "Pants on Fire"
Last edited: