Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 55,211
- 16,849
- 2,250
Nope. That’s just a preliminary determination.
No, that's establishing probable cause, due process of law, and the issuance of warrant that is FULLY enforceable.
Remember, you don't know a thing about the law. You're offering us your personal opinion about what 'shoulda' happened....with you citing yourself as your only legal authority. And you're nobody.
There is no legal question on if probable cause was established. Every judge to review the warrant (including Trump's favorite) concurs: it was. All the way up to the Appellant court.
And of course, the documents that the DOJ had probable cause to believe Trump had......Trump actually had. There's literally no legal argument to made. All due process requirements were met.
So what is there to debate?
Only partial credit.
What you persist in overlooking is that the determination is subject to challenge. Look up the motion called “motion to controvert a search warrant.” It’s cool stuff.
Trump had legal remedy: injunction. No court issued such injunction. Ergo, the subpoena too was fully enforceable.
Again, you're not making a legal argument. You're just pretending that you're a legal authority again.
You're not. Your opinion has no relevance to any legal matter we're discussing. Either quote a legal authority backing your argument, or continue to wallow in pseudo-legal irrelevance.