Randi Rhoades, Rachel Maddow, Olbermann, shit, thats just off the top adding to your list
Have you ever seen Rachel Maddow's show?
She's about the most mild mannered person I've ever seen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Randi Rhoades, Rachel Maddow, Olbermann, shit, thats just off the top adding to your list
Total crock. The working middle class has seen their economic position sliding downward for over twenty years. Even when Clinton was running things, all we got was a brief respite from the slide downward. In the meantime, the wealthy were huge gains, both in income and total ownership of this nations resources.
yes, i haveHave you ever seen Rachel Maddow's show?
She's about the most mild mannered person I've ever seen.
again, SO???90% of Americans control 4% of the wealth.
again, SO???
those that have it, must have earned itSo....societies with an unequitable distribution of wealth between capital and labor tend to break down after a while.
those that have it, must have earned it
let em have it
LOLAt one point the top 26 hedge fund managers were averaging $877 million dollars a year in income.
Of course we know now, it was all a Ponzi scheme.
Total crock. The working middle class has seen their economic position sliding downward for over twenty years. Even when Clinton was running things, all we got was a brief respite from the slide downward. In the meantime, the wealthy were huge gains, both in income and total ownership of this nations resources.
So....societies with an unequitable distribution of wealth between capital and labor tend to break down after a while.
At one point the top 26 hedge fund managers were averaging $877 million dollars a year in income.
Of course we know now, it was all a Ponzi scheme.
again, SO???
so, who gets to determine what is "too much"They're freaking idiots.
Am I wrong?
Look at the outcome (again) when the monied classes control too much of the society's assets.
well, clearly if anyone has more than you do, they are keeping you from actually earning it yourselfSo long as the poorer classes are not in any way prevented from attaining assets, it doesn't matter if there are wildly rich people in the society. They control their OWN assets, but don't control the assets of others, and that's the kicker.
It's when you have a government...which essentially becomes a ruling (and corrupt) class controlling the assets that you run into serious problems. Because in that case, people are PREVENTED from attaining assets.
so, who gets to determine what is "too much"
you?
no, we dontIsn't it wonderful how the "Conservatives" on this board are so quick to defend the miscreants that have caused this debacle. I am sure that it makes a "conservative" shudder.
So long as the poorer classes are not in any way prevented from attaining assets, it doesn't matter if there are wildly rich people in the society. They control their OWN assets, but don't control the assets of others, and that's the kicker.
It's when you have a government...which essentially becomes a ruling (and corrupt) class controlling the assets that you run into serious problems. Because in that case, people are PREVENTED from attaining assets.
Isn't it wonderful how the "Conservatives" on this board are so quick to defend the miscreants that have caused this debacle. I am sure that it makes a "conservative" shudder.