Racism…Pro Or Con?

[PoliticalChic]

If one votes Democrat, it is in support of racism, of judging individuals by their race.


The only…ONLY…racism in this country is Liberal Racism.

1.Thanks to Liberals, this is no longer the aim:
“I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character”. On 28 August in 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

There sure aren’t many Liberals screaming “All Lives Matter!!”





2. The false claim of anti-black racism, clearly the reverse of reality, is based on numbers of individuals in particular occupational or status groups…or college admission.

"If there were a contest for the most stupid idea in politics, my choice would be the assumption that people would be evenly or randomly distributed in incomes, institutions, occupations or awards, in the absence of somebody doing somebody wrong."
Thomas Sowell - The Dumbest Idea



3. Yet government coercion is directed at balancing said numbers across the spectrum. And to fulfill that mission, Liberals in power to make those decisions use racism against other groups…whites and Asians.
“Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted.”
Fewer Asians Need Apply



4. “Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race
For at least the past two decades, DOJ argues, Yale has consistently ensured that its freshman class is between roughly 6 and 8 percent black, an illegal "racial balancing." Salovey claimed that over the same period the racial composition of admitted applicants "fluctuated significantly for all groups" but did not address the concerns about black students specifically.”
Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,…” I don’t see any mention of skin color.

Liberalism is simply support for the dreaded “racism.”

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I wouldn't say that leftist racism is the ONLY racism.

It is simply the most overwhelmingly prevelant one and the one that is threatening to destroy our country by seeking to implement itself as the only allowable ideology.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't say that leftist racism is the ONLY racism.

It is simply the most overwhelmingly prevelant one and the one that is threatening to destroy our country by seeking to implement itself as the only allowable ideology.

Anti-white.....and anti-Asian.....are the most prevalent forms of racism.

i.e., Liberal racism.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I wouldn't say that leftist racism is the ONLY racism.

It is simply the most overwhelmingly prevelant one and the one that is threatening to destroy our country by seeking to implement itself as the only allowable ideology.

Anti-white.....and anti-Asian.....are the most prevalent forms of racism.

i.e., Liberal racism.

These are not liberals, but leftists, and yes, they are anti-white and anti Asian. They are also VERY much antisemitic.

I have pointed out how affirmative action is racist against Asians MANY times on this board.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I wouldn't say that leftist racism is the ONLY racism.

It is simply the most overwhelmingly prevelant one and the one that is threatening to destroy our country by seeking to implement itself as the only allowable ideology.

Anti-white.....and anti-Asian.....are the most prevalent forms of racism.

i.e., Liberal racism.

These are not liberals, but leftists, and yes, they are anti-white and anti Asian. They are also VERY much antisemitic.

I have pointed out how affirmative action is racist against Asians MANY times on this board.

I'm gonna agree with every item in that post with this clarification:
The term Liberal today, in the colloquial, is the Democrat/Progressive/socialist grouping.

It is due to the communist John Dewey persuading the Socialist Party to change its name to Liberal.....so that is the way it is accepted today.


How Socialist John Dewey Switched Labels
by Jim Peron

1. Pity the poor liberal. And I mean the real liberal. Not the modern watered-down socialist who calls himself a liberal but a real, honest, classical liberal. There is so much confusion over the term and real liberals have allowed fake liberals to get away with this subtle destruction of the language.
2. The classical liberals proposed laissez faire and this led to prosperity. The economics of 19th century liberalism brought about a major increase in the standard of living of all people. Thus real liberalism produced the effects which socialists dreamed their system would provide.
   1. Many socialists wanted prosperity and thought socialism would lead to such results faster than classical liberalism. But at the same time many socialists saw their ideology as a means of grabbing power for themselves and it was the power, not the promised prosperity, which attracted them.
3. [Socialists] knew that liberalism had a good reputation with the working classes — the very audience which they were targeting. The idea was to adopt the name liberal to describe socialism. Socialism, as socialism, was harder to sell. But by taking a name they did not deserve they felt they could make political gains on the backs of classical liberalism. And they did.
4. In the United States, where liberalism most clearly reversed its meaning, in common parlance, it was the socialist John Dewey who openly promoted the idea of stealing the liberal label. Dewey, in his book Individualism Old and Newargued that liberal individualism had in fact disappeared and been replaced by state capitalism and that collectivism already existed in America.
   1. But he noted the collectivism of that day was a “collectivism of profit” and not a “collectivism of planning”. He said the only way liberalism could return to its true meaning was to adopt socialism as the means by which liberal goals would be achieved. As he put it central economic planning was “the sole method of social action by which liberalism can realize its professed aims.”
5. Peter Witonski, in his essay The Historical Roots of American Planningsaid: “Dewey was the first to argue that the world ‘liberal’—which once stood for liberal, free-market capitalism—could better serve the needs of social democracy in America than the world ‘socialism’.
   1. The liberalism of Adam Smith was out-of-date Dewey argued.” In his book Liberalism and Social Action, Dewey suggested that the goals of a free society could best be obtained “only by a reversal of the means to which early liberalism was committed.” But the means of liberalism were fundamentally connected to the basic premises of liberalism. A reversal of means, while keeping similar goals in mind, also changed the premises of liberalism. The “new wisdom” of Keynes with the “reversal of means” of Dewey really meant stealing the name of liberalism and applying it to another very different species. The famed economist Joseph Schumpeter noted that “the enemies of private enterprise have thought it wise to appropriate its label.”
6. Today a great deal of confusion reigns because socialists decided to deceptively call their own ideology liberal. And, to a very large degree, the academics who wrote the recent texts on liberalism were socialists. Hence they were quite willing to pretend that socialism was a modern form of classical liberalism.
7. [Classical] liberal describes individuals supporting free markets, private property, profit management and limited governments. So-called “liberals” support socialism, state ownership, bureaucratic management and statism.

http://orlingrabbe.com/lfetimes/liberal_confusion.htm

Democracy & free markets vs socialism

www.freerepublic.com

http://forum.rottentomatoes.com/topic/show/1369713?page=2

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. If 'race' is a criterion for admission.....it's racist.




"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, the DOJ alleged that Yale was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by institutions that receive federal funds. In its 32-page complaint, the department documents Yale's use of race as a factor at every step of its admissions process and details statistical evidence that students of similar academic skill but different racial groups face wildly divergent admissions chances.

The suit follows DOJ's official request that Yale cease its use of race as an admissions factor, itself the result of a multi-year investigation into Yale's admissions practices. Although the two institutions negotiated extensively since that request was made in August, a DOJ official told the Washington Free Beacon, Yale has refused to alter its admissions process, necessitating legal action."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

 

[IM2]

5. If 'race' is a criterion for admission.....it's racist.




"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, the DOJ alleged that Yale was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by institutions that receive federal funds. In its 32-page complaint, the department documents Yale's use of race as a factor at every step of its admissions process and details statistical evidence that students of similar academic skill but different racial groups face wildly divergent admissions chances.

The suit follows DOJ's official request that Yale cease its use of race as an admissions factor, itself the result of a multi-year investigation into Yale's admissions practices. Although the two institutions negotiated extensively since that request was made in August, a DOJ official told the Washington Free Beacon, Yale has refused to alter its admissions process, necessitating legal action."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

Asians are admitted based on race too. Before AA your SAT score would not have mattered if you were not white. If AA had not been implemented, you'd be folding laundry.

 

[danielpalos]

If one votes Democrat, it is in support of racism, of judging individuals by their race.


The only…ONLY…racism in this country is Liberal Racism.

1.Thanks to Liberals, this is no longer the aim:
“I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character”. On 28 August in 1963, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

There sure aren’t many Liberals screaming “All Lives Matter!!”





2. The false claim of anti-black racism, clearly the reverse of reality, is based on numbers of individuals in particular occupational or status groups…or college admission.

"If there were a contest for the most stupid idea in politics, my choice would be the assumption that people would be evenly or randomly distributed in incomes, institutions, occupations or awards, in the absence of somebody doing somebody wrong."
Thomas Sowell - The Dumbest Idea



3. Yet government coercion is directed at balancing said numbers across the spectrum. And to fulfill that mission, Liberals in power to make those decisions use racism against other groups…whites and Asians.
“Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted.”
Fewer Asians Need Apply



4. “Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race
For at least the past two decades, DOJ argues, Yale has consistently ensured that its freshman class is between roughly 6 and 8 percent black, an illegal "racial balancing." Salovey claimed that over the same period the racial composition of admitted applicants "fluctuated significantly for all groups" but did not address the concerns about black students specifically.”
Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race


“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,…” I don’t see any mention of skin color.

Liberalism is simply support for the dreaded “racism.”

Right wingers are worse. They have nothing but bigotry not "all men are created equal" by God.

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. If 'race' is a criterion for admission.....it's racist.




"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, the DOJ alleged that Yale was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by institutions that receive federal funds. In its 32-page complaint, the department documents Yale's use of race as a factor at every step of its admissions process and details statistical evidence that students of similar academic skill but different racial groups face wildly divergent admissions chances.

The suit follows DOJ's official request that Yale cease its use of race as an admissions factor, itself the result of a multi-year investigation into Yale's admissions practices. Although the two institutions negotiated extensively since that request was made in August, a DOJ official told the Washington Free Beacon, Yale has refused to alter its admissions process, necessitating legal action."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

Asians are admitted based on race too. Before AA your SAT score would not have mattered if you were not white. If AA had not been implemented, you'd be folding laundry.

"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"If accurate, DOJ's allegations provide new evidence of systematic racial discrimination against Asian and white applicants within the Ivy League. As with other pending lawsuits, the charges could give the most conservative Supreme Court in a generation the chance to upend a 40-year-old system of affirmative action. But the election of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden could also see the case gutted, putting the fate of thousands of higher education applicants on the line in the coming election.

...DOJ argues, Yale has consistently ensured that its freshman class is between roughly 6 and 8 percent black, an illegal "racial balancing."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

"....you'd be folding laundry. "

Your sort seems to find some problem with earning an honest living.

That may be a large part of your problem.

 

[IM2]

5. If 'race' is a criterion for admission.....it's racist.




"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, the DOJ alleged that Yale was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by institutions that receive federal funds. In its 32-page complaint, the department documents Yale's use of race as a factor at every step of its admissions process and details statistical evidence that students of similar academic skill but different racial groups face wildly divergent admissions chances.

The suit follows DOJ's official request that Yale cease its use of race as an admissions factor, itself the result of a multi-year investigation into Yale's admissions practices. Although the two institutions negotiated extensively since that request was made in August, a DOJ official told the Washington Free Beacon, Yale has refused to alter its admissions process, necessitating legal action."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

Asians are admitted based on race too. Before AA your SAT score would not have mattered if you were not white. If AA had not been implemented, you'd be folding laundry.

"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

Racial Demographics & Diversity
Racial Diversity
Very High
A college's ethnic diversity is indicated by the student body's equal inclusion of students from different backgrounds . Students at Yale are predominantly White with a smaller Asian population. The school has very high racial diversity. 53% percent of students are minorities or people of color (BIPOC). The ethnic breakdown is detailed in the following table.

Race	Percent of Students
White	47%
Black	7%
Hispanic	11%
Asian	17%
American Indian / Alaskan	1%
Hawaiian / Pacific Islander	0%
Two or more races	6%
International	11%
Race Unknown	1%

There are 2.5 times more Asians than blacks at Yale. You're a disingenuous lying bitch.

Yale University Diversity & Student Demographics

Diversity, inclusion and demographic statistics about race, gender and income for Yale University students.

www.collegesimply.com

.

 

[PoliticalChic]

5. If 'race' is a criterion for admission.....it's racist.




"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

In a lawsuit filed Thursday afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, the DOJ alleged that Yale was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits racial discrimination by institutions that receive federal funds. In its 32-page complaint, the department documents Yale's use of race as a factor at every step of its admissions process and details statistical evidence that students of similar academic skill but different racial groups face wildly divergent admissions chances.

The suit follows DOJ's official request that Yale cease its use of race as an admissions factor, itself the result of a multi-year investigation into Yale's admissions practices. Although the two institutions negotiated extensively since that request was made in August, a DOJ official told the Washington Free Beacon, Yale has refused to alter its admissions process, necessitating legal action."

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

Asians are admitted based on race too. Before AA your SAT score would not have mattered if you were not white. If AA had not been implemented, you'd be folding laundry.

"Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

Racial Demographics & Diversity
Racial Diversity
Very High
A college's ethnic diversity is indicated by the student body's equal inclusion of students from different backgrounds . Students at Yale are predominantly White with a smaller Asian population. The school has very high racial diversity. 53% percent of students are minorities or people of color (BIPOC). The ethnic breakdown is detailed in the following table.

Race	Percent of Students
White	47%
Black	7%
Hispanic	11%
Asian	17%
American Indian / Alaskan	1%
Hawaiian / Pacific Islander	0%
Two or more races	6%
International	11%
Race Unknown	1%

There are 2.5 times more Asians than blacks at Yale. You're a disingenuous lying bitch.

Yale University Diversity & Student Demographics

Diversity, inclusion and demographic statistics about race, gender and income for Yale University students.

www.collegesimply.com

.

This OK too???

“Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted.”
Fewer Asians Need Apply

 

[PoliticalChic]

"These disparities, DOJ argues, are driven by Yale's use of race at every step of the admissions process. According to the complaint, application readers are encouraged to use race as an explicit factor in grading the quality of an applicant; Yale also regularly "bops" white and Asian applicants, replacing them with black or Hispanic applicants to maintain the class's racial composition.
...this case could go all the way to the Supreme Court, giving a more sympathetic body the chance to revisit affirmative action rulings and the first opportunity to consider how the Civil Rights Act governs affirmative action at private institutions. "

Data Reveal How Yale Discriminates Based on Race

Black applicants to Yale University are up to eight times more likely to be admitted than Asian applicants with the same level of academic skill, a disparity that the Department of Justice says violates federal law.

freebeacon.com

Now.....if race is a requirement for admission.......isn't the policy racist.......by definition?


Did I mention how many judges Trump has managed to install?

Conservative judges.....y'know......not racists?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"For too long, agencies of the federal government have turned a blind eye to the blatant discrimination directed against Asian Americans and whites in college admissions policies. It is our hope that this lawsuit eventually will contribute to the end of racial classifications and preferences at all U.S. colleges and universities."

One thing, however, could stand between DOJ and successful litigation against Yale: the November election. Democrats have been broadly critical of President Donald Trump's prosecutorial focus on higher education, dismissing it as a partisan attack. The Biden campaign did not respond to a request for comment as to whether or not Biden would continue the lawsuit against Yale if elected."
Ibid.