Rachael Madcow is Slanderous *****

[Truthmatters]

You can not PROVE Rachel was incorrect about them being affliated huh?

their longtime Cato employee runs the ******* group

 

[TooTall]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

If it's true, it isn't legally slander or libelous. Summarizing a bill's impact as with Arizona's religious freedom thing is protected speech and opinion if it's true. In this case, if you have to pay extra for abortions, since rape is often a reason to get an abortion, it is fairly called 'rape insurance.'

What percentage of abortions are the result of a woman beiing raped? I don't know, but I seriously doubt it is often the reason and suspect it is in the single digits as a percentage.

 

[Truthmatters]

just having that man on the board makes them Koch affliated just like Madow said huh

 

[Truthmatters]

Rachel Maddow busted lying about the Koch brothers! (via Instapundit)





Maddow doesn’t support laws mandating drug testing for welfare recipients and she recently ran a segment attacking the Koch brothers for supporting such laws in Florida.

Only problem for Maddow and her progressive followers is that the Kochs are not involved with this law in Florida. They don’t support the group Maddow insists they support. Her entire vicious report is based on a demonstratively false premise.

Predictably instead of being a responsible woman of integrity, Rachel Maddow is refusing to correct her story.

Unfortunately for Rachel Maddow, her claims against the Kochs are so blatantly false even the Washington Post is calling Rachel Maddow out:

The Kochs’ extensive reach notwithstanding, they cannot be connected to everything.Tarren Bragdon, the chief executive officer of the FGA, tells the Erik Wemple Blog that his organization “did not work with the Kochs on the Florida drug-testing issue. To the best of my knowledge, they were not involved at all.” The Kochs’ general counsel, Holden, is a bit more definitive: “Right hand to God, we were not involved.”

BUSTED! Rachel Maddow & MSNBC Caught In Embarrassing Lie ? Refuse To Correct | The Gateway Pundit





She lied.

You lied.

Busted.

where is the PROOF they gave no funds to this group you idiot

The WaPo finds it to be true....

even the Washington Post is calling Rachel Maddow out:

The Kochs’ extensive reach notwithstanding, they cannot be connected to everything.Tarren Bragdon, the chief executive officer of the FGA, tells the Erik Wemple Blog that his organization “did not work with the Kochs on the Florida drug-testing issue. To the best of my knowledge, they were not involved at all.” The Kochs’ general counsel, Holden, is a bit more definitive: “Right hand to God, we were not involved.”

Did wo po mention that they own the CATO group and the CATO group is run by the guy who is on the other groups board?


hmmmmmmm


why didn't they do their homework fully?

 

[flacaltenn]

If a woman is raped and gets pregnant and (obviously) does not want to keep her rapist's baby, paying extra for abortion insurance is de facto rape insurance.

Why should a woman have to pay more to cover abortion?

Why is the state mandating this?

She WONT be paying more ---- everyone who opts OUT will be paying less. You cant pretend that the crappy policies allowed under Obaminal Care are covering much of anything up to 4 or 5 thousand dollars of charges.. if folks are capable of choosing deductibles loike that ---- They should be allowed to opt out of any ala carte items they want to.

Why haven't Right-Wingers ever demanded that insurance companies offer à la carte coverage?

Silly Wabbit.. USED to be that insurance companies were allowed to use their brains to rate folk INDIVIDUALLY according to their TRUE needs.. So if you had functioning ovaries, you were covered for D & C procedures.. NOW -- insurance companies are OUTLAWED from considering anything but your AGE, Location, and tobacco consumption..

Really won't matter to the LESS affluent.. Because THEIR Obaminal care coverage will have a $4K or $6K deductible and the rape victim will be stuck paying MOST of the procedure anyway....

 

[bodecea]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

If a woman is raped and gets pregnant and (obviously) does not want to keep her rapist's baby, paying extra for abortion insurance is de facto rape insurance.

Why should a woman have to pay more to cover abortion?

Why is the state mandating this?

The OP sure seems upset about this.

 

[flacaltenn]

Moderation Message:

This thread is on life support.
If you can revive it.. Enjoy..
But if it doesn't stay on topic, it's
gotta get closed.

flacaltenn

 

[FJO]

Rachel Maddow is awful. I can't believe she's made a career out of what she does. Thank goodness her ratings are terrible.

Her ratings are better than Megyn Kelly's in the demographic that advertisers care about.

They do not care about angry old White people who have been glued to FOXNEWS all day long, receiving their daily hate brainwashing.

Would you care to rethink or research that?

TVNewser - And Now the News...About TV News

 

[FJO]

If a woman is raped and gets pregnant and (obviously) does not want to keep her rapist's baby, paying extra for abortion insurance is de facto rape insurance.

Why should a woman have to pay more to cover abortion?

Why is the state mandating this?

Estimates of people wishing to adopt are as high as 2 million in the U.S. alone.

Why be a flushing parent when you can provide for a gushing parent.

I love babies. Especially the pre-born kind.

There are more children currently available for adoption than there are people willing to adopt.

If Right-Wingers are so concerned about children why don't they adopt the ones who have already been born?

And why should any woman have to spend 9 months growing and nurturing a rapist's fetus?

The last Republican presidential contender's family adopted a baby of African-American ancestry.

Were you among the Democrats who made a sick joke of that and ridiculed the family?

 

[SillyWabbit]

Rachel Maddow is awful. I can't believe she's made a career out of what she does. Thank goodness her ratings are terrible.

I'm not convinced she's a she.

 

[Synthaholic]

So is there an extra premium for prostate cancer? Heart surgery? Kidney dialysis? Any number of ailments that most people don't get?

No.

Because it's rape insurance.

I love a Grandma who kicks ass.

 

[jillian]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

you're lucky i don't neg you for that trash, kiddo.

don't right-wingers know how to disagree with females without using words like ***** or ho or whatever else you like to call women.

and you don't have a clue what you're talking about in regard to the bill.

try again… without the ignorance and misogyny.

 

[Synthaholic]

Estimates of people wishing to adopt are as high as 2 million in the U.S. alone.

Why be a flushing parent when you can provide for a gushing parent.

I love babies. Especially the pre-born kind.

There are more children currently available for adoption than there are people willing to adopt.

If Right-Wingers are so concerned about children why don't they adopt the ones who have already been born?

And why should any woman have to spend 9 months growing and nurturing a rapist's fetus?

Classic deflection once again,love the old adoption angle. So a fast glance,one would say that the left ,if they haven't already had you aborted,aren't adopting very many ether.

Can you say I am a hypocrite.

When we value money and convenience over life,as so many have we are in deep shit.

You obviously meant to direct this at the estimable Mr. H, since he introduced the topic of adoption in the post I quoted.

 

[Synthaholic]

Is Lush limpballs a roades scholor?

I doubt he graduated from High School.

But that's how the wingnuts like their leaders: loud & dumb.

 

[Synthaholic]

If Rush Limbaugh ever loses his eyesight, he'll sure play a mean pinball.

Ooh! I'm gonna tweet that!

 

[Political Junky]

Estimates of people wishing to adopt are as high as 2 million in the U.S. alone.

Why be a flushing parent when you can provide for a gushing parent.

I love babies. Especially the pre-born kind.

There are more children currently available for adoption than there are people willing to adopt.

If Right-Wingers are so concerned about children why don't they adopt the ones who have already been born?

And why should any woman have to spend 9 months growing and nurturing a rapist's fetus?

The last Republican presidential contender's family adopted a baby of African-American ancestry.

Were you among the Democrats who made a sick joke of that and ridiculed the family?

In a previous run for president by McCain, it was his republican adversary that floated the story that McCain had fathered a black out of wedlock child. In truth, the McCains had adopted a black child.

 

[MarcATL]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

It IS rape insurance.

If you get rape and didn't have that rape insurance...you have to PAY MORE! Hence...Rape Insurance.

Rachel pegged them good...once again.

 

[MarcATL]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

Why are you so angry?

WHO are you angry at?

 

[Mertex]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

You don't like Rachel Maddow because she just happens to be one of the most educated eloquent newscasters on MSNBC, and compared to the bimbos on Faux News, there's no one her equal. And the fact that you don't understand her explanation of it, makes you the dishonest person in saying that she is dishonest. Whine and weep......she's right.

 

[Mertex]

She is claiming that Michigan is about to sign into a "rape" insurance requirement! What a lying SOB.

The bill that law makers are signing into law is an abortion premium RELIEF bill. If you want your insurance to cover abortion, then you pay an extra premium. Look not everyone believes in abortion, so why should they be forced to pay higher premiums to keep it in their insurance policy? If you want it covered in your insurance policy, then don't complain if you have to pay more for it! It used to be the same for child birth. Not everyone is going to need or want it, but the extra coverage is extremely expensive. With Obamacare every policy must include it, so everyone premiums increase a ton.

But I digress. This is obviously about not having people who don't believe in abortion having to pay higher premiums to include it in their insurance policy. But the sick lying ***** Madcow calls it rape insurance. Here is her thinking. Women who are raped might get pregnant from the assault, since the Michigan law will require an extra charge to cover abortion, women now pay for rape insurance! It a fallacy in logic from one of the most dishonest people in media!

Why are you so angry?

WHO are you angry at?

He's mad at Obama because Obama brought that plane down in Malaysia, or Obama didn't keep it from happening....it's just a bunch of butt hurt coming out of all their orifices.