Putin is a poor chess player. Kazakh president fails to quell protests, ex-Soviet states offer help

Baron

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2008
14,229
6,709
370
Brooklyn, NYC
Obviously Putin pokers too high. As response to his NATO ultimatum he received Orange Revolution in Kazakhstan
All variants are possible.

- a Civil war for indefinite time
- .an insurgence against Russian troups
- Jihad of course
- A war between Russian and Kazakhs parts of the country
- Including of Russian part in Russia
- Involvement of China
- Involvement of another countries including Turkey
- Probably involvement of NATO
- No participation of EU, no one side needs morons from Paris, Brussels or Berlin

The box of Pandora is open.

Bottom line: As I wrote it is an idiocy to try to negotiate with the West. Russia will be always cheated.
Putin is of course a poor player in the world chess.


A Russia-led security alliance of ex-Soviet states will send peacekeeping forces to Kazakhstan, Armenia's prime minister said on Thursday, after the Kazakh president appealed for their help in quelling violent and deadly protests.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said on Facebook that an unspecified number of peacekeepers would go to Kazakhstan for a limited period to stabilise the situation after state buildings were torched and the Almaty international airport was seized.
Eight police and national guard troops were killed in the unrest on Tuesday and Wednesday, Russia's state-owned Sputnik agency quoted the Kazakh interior ministry as saying on Wednesday. Russian news agencies, quoting Kazakh media, later said two soldiers had also been killed in what they described as an anti-terrorist operation at Almaty airport.

Initially sparked by anger at a fuel price rise, the protests have quickly spread to take in wider opposition to President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev's predecessor Nursultan Nazarbayev, who retained significant power despite quitting in 2019 after a nearly three-decade rule.


http%3A%2F%2Fcom.ft.imagepublish.upp-prod-eu.s3.amazonaws.com%2F319c862a-946f-11e5-bd82-c1fb87bef7af
 
The odds are high that the authorities there will take the situation back under their control. If not, what difference will it make? It doesn't matter what name of the next dictator there will be.
 
The odds are high that the authorities there will take the situation back under their control. If not, what difference will it make? It doesn't matter what name of the next dictator there will be.

In any case riots were provoked by Scamdemic 'measures'
All countries which force citizens to the fake '*vaccine' will have the same.
Russia, Italy, France, Germany etc.
 
"For a year they talked about how Russian troops would be sent to Belarus,
for another three months about how they would be sent to Ukraine,
and as a result they end up in Kazakhstan in one day.
A good lesson for those who like to reveal insidious plans ..." (c)

By the way, do you realize that when ordinary people in the United States hear something about Kazakhstan, eighty percent of them are sure that this is the country from where Borat came to the United States?
 
Last edited:
"For a year they talked about how Russian troops would be sent to Belarus,
for another three months about how they would be sent to Ukraine,
and as a result they end up in Kazakhstan in one day.
A good lesson for those who like to reveal insidious plans ..." (c)

By the way, do you realize that when ordinary people in the United States hear something about Kazakhstan, eighty percent of them are sure that this is the country from where Borat came to the United States?

Don't keep Americans for fools.
 
More milestones of protest success.
As a result of the riots in Kazakhstan, the Golden Fund of Kazakh Cinema was destroyed. It burned down, local media reported.
 
More milestones of protest success.
As a result of the riots in Kazakhstan, the Golden Fund of Kazakh Cinema was destroyed. It burned down, local media reported.

Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Ukraine shall clean up countries from corrupted thieves politicians and oligarchs and establish more fair and free societies, but without any involvement of the West.
Nothing good comes from the West to any country of the former USSR
 
I read an article about the wealth of the former President of Kazakhstan Nazarbayev... Dozens of houses, estates and apartments in the USA, England, Switzerland worth from 20 to 140 million dollars each....
Let's omit the fact that the most honest media did not know anything about it before, although it was not hidden at all. I just want to ask a question: is it possible for an official to get such money in any other way than selling out his country? Damn them all! Them are their descendants.
That's why Comrade Stalin's popularity is growing among the population of the former USSR.
 
I read an article about the wealth of the former President of Kazakhstan Nazarbayev... Dozens of houses, estates and apartments in the USA, England, Switzerland worth from 20 to 140 million dollars each....
Let's omit the fact that the most honest media did not know anything about it before, although it was not hidden at all. I just want to ask a question: is it possible for an official to get such money in any other way than selling out his country? Damn them all! They are their descendants.
That's why Comrade Stalin's popularity is growing among the population of the former USSR.

No Lenin, No Stalin, No Mao, No Putin, No Zelensky, No Tokaev, no other dictators
Freedom only is needed
 
How old are you?

Between 1 and 100 years.

Question:

Why Russian and Kazakh peoples can not kick all thievish politicians and oligarchs to Hell and to begin share money for sold commodities among themselves?
Like all rich Arabic countries in Persian Gulf it do?
Today all profit from export comes to 'politicians' or oligarchs with the dual citizenship ( mostly an Israel one ), but not to the people who own all commodities.
Moreover peoples have the right to have own industry which has been continuously destroyed in both countries
 
Question:
Why Russian and Kazakh peoples can not kick all thievish politicians and oligarchs to Hell and to begin share money for sold commodities among themselves?
Like all rich Arabic countries in Persian Gulf it do?
Today all profit from export comes to 'politicians' or oligarchs with the dual citizenship ( mostly an Israel one ), but not to the people who own all commodities.
Moreover peoples have the right to have own industry which has been continuously destroyed in both countries
In order to do all this, a socialist revolution is needed. Only she can do it. Otherwise, there will only be a transition of power from one group of oligarchs to another. In order for a socialist revolution to take place, certain conditions must arise, a revolutionary situation.

(1) when it is impossible for the ruling classes to maintain their rule without any change; when there is a crisis, in one form or another, among the “upper classes”, a crisis in the policy of the ruling class, leading to a fissure through which the discontent and indignation of the oppressed classes burst forth. For a revolution to take place, it is usually insufficient for “the lower classes not to want” to live in the old way; it is also necessary that “the upper classes should be unable” to rule in the old way;

(2) when the suffering and want of the oppressed classes have grown more acute than usual;

(3) when, as a consequence of the above causes, there is a considerable increase in the activity of the masses, who uncomplainingly allow themselves to be robbed in “peace time”, but, in turbulent times, are drawn both by all the circumstances of the crisis and by the “upper classes” themselves into independent historical action.

Without these objective changes, which are independent of the will, not only of individual groups and parties but even of individual classes, a revolution, as a general rule, is impossible. The totality of all these objective changes is called a revolutionary situation."

"But revolution does not arise from every revolutionary situation, but only from such a situation, when a subjective one joins the objective changes listed above." What is this subjective change? "According to Lenin
" It is the ability of the revolutionary class to revolutionary mass actions strong enough to break the old government, which will never, even in an era of crises, "fall" if it is not "dropped." Said the leader of the world proletariat, Lenin
And without revolutionary party, that can lead revolutionary class, the victory of the socialist revolution under question. Without leadership of the marxist party, there will be just another Maidan of the capitalists.

Whether all these conditions exist now in Russia or Kazakhstan, you can make a conclusion yourself.
 
In order to do all this, a socialist revolution is needed. Only she can do it. Otherwise, there will only be a transition of power from one group of oligarchs to another. In order for a socialist revolution to take place, certain conditions must arise, a revolutionary situation.

(1) when it is impossible for the ruling classes to maintain their rule without any change; when there is a crisis, in one form or another, among the “upper classes”, a crisis in the policy of the ruling class, leading to a fissure through which the discontent and indignation of the oppressed classes burst forth. For a revolution to take place, it is usually insufficient for “the lower classes not to want” to live in the old way; it is also necessary that “the upper classes should be unable” to rule in the old way;

(2) when the suffering and want of the oppressed classes have grown more acute than usual;

(3) when, as a consequence of the above causes, there is a considerable increase in the activity of the masses, who uncomplainingly allow themselves to be robbed in “peace time”, but, in turbulent times, are drawn both by all the circumstances of the crisis and by the “upper classes” themselves into independent historical action.

Without these objective changes, which are independent of the will, not only of individual groups and parties but even of individual classes, a revolution, as a general rule, is impossible. The totality of all these objective changes is called a revolutionary situation."

"But revolution does not arise from every revolutionary situation, but only from such a situation, when a subjective one joins the objective changes listed above." What is this subjective change? "According to Lenin
" It is the ability of the revolutionary class to revolutionary mass actions strong enough to break the old government, which will never, even in an era of crises, "fall" if it is not "dropped." Said the leader of the world proletariat, Lenin
And without revolutionary party, that can lead revolutionary class, the victory of the socialist revolution under question. Without leadership of the marxist party, there will be just another Maidan of the capitalists.

Whether all these conditions exist now in Russia or Kazakhstan, you can make a conclusion yourself.

You forget Russian Nationalism.
Who needs shitty and corrupted 'parties' of any political direction?
Within few time of riots Nationalists will take the,power in the country
Putin's idiotic support of QR-codes does a revolution unavoidable
 

Forum List

Back
Top