Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
..what for? what's the point? ...foreigners ARE bad...human nature [ and common sense ] to see foreigners as enemies .......
free book for you
Tsarev ulus: Russia in the Golden Horde - JStor
www.jstor.org › stable
by CJ Halperin · ‎1982 · ‎Cited by 14 · ‎Related articles
Moscow, the grand principality,. Rus1, was the tsarev ulus, the ulus of the khan,(7) the grand ... unlikely to have imagined but which reflects the Muscovite book ...
The point is Litwin has IQ-10
Yes, but he use very outdated Ukrainian narrative. It's not in fashion even in Ukraine now. That's why I think, that he is a Brit. May be - a Brit with not-European origin, recently migrated in the UK...what for? what's the point? ...foreigners ARE bad...human nature [ and common sense ] to see foreigners as enemies .......
free book for you
Tsarev ulus: Russia in the Golden Horde - JStor
www.jstor.org › stable
by CJ Halperin · ‎1982 · ‎Cited by 14 · ‎Related articles
Moscow, the grand principality,. Rus1, was the tsarev ulus, the ulus of the khan,(7) the grand ... unlikely to have imagined but which reflects the Muscovite book ...
The point is Litwin has IQ-10
this is why I think Litwin in not a Jew but a Ukrainian
all that Mongol narrative is common to Ukrainian Nazis, not Jews...
Really not. Bureaucratic language of pre-Peter Russia was Church-slavonic, then it became more of French and German, and of course, French-infuenced Russian."
J. Halperin 'Muscovy and the Golden Horde', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1987
http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/catalog/pro...oducts_id=21458
(page .92):
... the language of the Muscovite bureacracy was kind of meta-Turkic, a hyperliteral calque of Turco-Tatar formulae and forms which is often linguistically meaningless without recourse to the Tatar originals. Supposedly Muscovite bureaucratic paper followed Mongol formats. 12. All bureacratic language is stylized, of course, but there is no question of the awkwardness and obscurity of Muscovite bureaucratic jargon. As yet the evidence that is syntactical, morphological, and lexical features derive from Turco-Tatar models remains suggestive rather than conclusive, but the connection is worthy of further research. Since the chancellery language of the Golden Horrde was Turkic written in Uighur script, it might be fruitful to explore the dessimination of Uighur script among Russian scribes...
."
a good post still at least 3 errorsReally not. Bureaucratic language of pre-Peter Russia was Church-slavonic, then it became more of French and German, and of course, French-infuenced Russian."
J. Halperin 'Muscovy and the Golden Horde', Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1987
http://www.iupress.indiana.edu/catalog/pro...oducts_id=21458
(page .92):
... the language of the Muscovite bureacracy was kind of meta-Turkic, a hyperliteral calque of Turco-Tatar formulae and forms which is often linguistically meaningless without recourse to the Tatar originals. Supposedly Muscovite bureaucratic paper followed Mongol formats. 12. All bureacratic language is stylized, of course, but there is no question of the awkwardness and obscurity of Muscovite bureaucratic jargon. As yet the evidence that is syntactical, morphological, and lexical features derive from Turco-Tatar models remains suggestive rather than conclusive, but the connection is worthy of further research. Since the chancellery language of the Golden Horrde was Turkic written in Uighur script, it might be fruitful to explore the dessimination of Uighur script among Russian scribes...
."
And yes, Mongolian language is not Turkish one.
![]()
Mongolian language - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org