Rust_Cohle
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
Still waiting. You gonna conceded and apologize asshat?They are facts and you are nothing more than a lying Trumpling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still waiting. You gonna conceded and apologize asshat?They are facts and you are nothing more than a lying Trumpling.
Point out where in this thread I've lied about anything. I will wait and then you can apologize
Politifact really? Good thing some of us here have long memories![]()
Vladimir Putin repeats false claim of genocide in Ukraine
Russia has given several reasons for launching a war against Ukraine. In a televised address announcing the military asswww.politifact.com
![]()
Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin address fact-checked
BBC News looks into several claims the Russian president made about Ukraine.www.bbc.com
Translation - "it's only real history if I agree with it"Learn some real history
Attacking the source of the argument rather than attacking the argument itself in a way that avoids dealing with the question of whether or not the argument itself is true. It’s a logical fallacy because it’s used to deliberately obfuscate the goal of a logical conclusion to the debate.Stop relying on the always wrong Politifact for your fact checking
Russia isn't communist anymore. Learn the difference
No I love America, unlike you Johnny Reb,
I don't agree with Imperialism or Regime change or neoliberal policies though
Let me ask you then. If someone relies on what they've seen happening for the past 9 years as their facts and someone else (YOU) relies on Politifact who are known to be "fact checkers" for the government narrative who do you think would be more correct?Translation - "it's only real history if I agree with it"
Attacking the source of the argument rather than attacking the argument itself in a way that avoids dealing with the question of whether or not the argument itself is true. It’s a logical fallacy because it’s used to deliberately obfuscate the goal of a logical conclusion to the debate.
Says the guy who supports the Union while claiming to be a reb. Homeguard would have your ass if this was the 1860sEven post communist Russia, bloody wars were fought and puppet governments were attempted, but failed. Chechnya, and Georgia and Crimea are good examples of attempted annexation and installation of puppet leaders. You're dealing with Vladimir Putin, ex-KGB and Stasi, you're not going to get that communist brain washing out of him. He has goals, goals that are Soviet in ideology and aim.
You're having a hard time proving it.
And a rebel can love America more than anything. You should know it, schooled dumbfuck. Minimal government, political freedom, and did I say limited government?
Russia has a history of regime changes, puppet governments, and annexation. You hate supposed American imperialism, but here you are cheering on an armed annexation of an independent territory, so a pro-Russian leader can be installed. That is the definition of hypocrisy.
What history? Break it down if you will.Because I know history. Why are you rooting for American Imperialism and regime change? Why are you supporting debt dodging Ukraine? Why are you supporting a nation we did a coup in 2014 to put pro NATO president in power? Why are you supporting a nation that for 8 years straight bombed ethnic Russian living in the east?
I thought you libs were against all this bs? But you're really shitlibs aren't you
Its been posted above post #44 I'm not repeating it for you.What history? Break it down if you will.
Are you suggesting that Putin's Russia is engaged in payback then?Its been posted above post #44 I'm not repeating it for you.
Says the guy who supports the Union while claiming to be a reb. Homeguard would have your ass if this was the 1860s
If you listen to the lying western media.While I agree, it did come at a tremendous cost, over months and months of fighting. I don't know that in the end game, thousands of casualties can be justified for a relatively normal city.
I'm suggesting you stop typing like Marv Albert coked up at a BDSM party. I'm also suggesting the west and NATO 100% instigated this war with their policies going back 2004 if not soonerAre you suggesting that Putin's Russia is engaged in payback then?
I'm born and raised in Virginia so no and I certainly wouldn't blindly follow anything the Union says unlike youOh, so we're talking about me now?
So would you be a billy yank? Marching on your fellow countrymen in the name of the Fed and the negro? I wouldn't be.
If you listen to the lying western media.
The Russians are losing tens of thousands of soldiers to capture Bakhmut.
But the truth is the Russian's employ tactics to preserve their soldier's lives.
Also, the media goes on and on about Russia's slow territorial gains because of stiff Ukrainian resistance.
When actually, the Russian army is methodically advancing by having massive artillery bombardments on Ukrainian forces sometimes lasting for days.
Followed by advancing the Russian infantry a few miles to mop up and kill or capture any remaining Ukrainian forces.
Then repeat the artillery bombardment / infantry advancement process again and again . ...![]()
I'm born and raised in Virginia so no and I certainly wouldn't blindly follow anything the Union says unlike you
Keep "the West" out of it.I'm suggesting you stop typing like Marv Albert coked up at a BDSM party. I'm also suggesting the west and NATO 100% instigated this war with their policies going back 2004 if not sooner
The “Khazarian Mafia” ?He is aware of the background, unlike you, and knows what is at stake against the Khazarian Mafia, aka US led and Ukey Nazi forces ,
About time you DYOFR .What history? Break it down if you will.