Putin Awards Hero Of Russia To Soldier In Knife Fight

Russia can't even beat the Ukraine.... Andorra could **** Russia up the ass right now.
They are beating Ukraine /Nato you show the same arrogance and delusion that has led to you losing several wars since WW2, most EU Countries are economic ruins or on the way to being, if there was a direct conflict some EU Countries would be no show because they know Europe would be a incinerated ruin, Berlin would look worse than 1945.
 
They are beating Ukraine /Nato you show the same arrogance and delusion that has led to you losing several wars since WW2, most EU Countries are economic ruins or on the way to being, if there was a direct conflict some EU Countries would be no show because they know Europe would be a incinerated ruin, Berlin would look worse than 1945.

Yeah.... beating.... just. And Russia is FOUR TIMES LARGER and has a much bigger GDP and isn't seeing its internal structures being bombed to shit. And it's still stuck in the east.

They said they'd be in Kiev in 2 days.

As for your latter comments, they're just your fantasy. Yes, there's no appetite for war in those countries, but at the same time, the EU has a GDP of $19 trillion, which is about 9.5 times larger than that of Russia.

If Russia could fight the EU, it would have done, it hasn't. It's kept to Georgia, the Ukraine etc.
 
So far you've provided zero evidence (for anything and..) for your claims.


"Hate crimes in Ukraine have risen dramatically in the past 18 months, according to human rights groups and an Associated Press report.


Sixty racist attacks — six of them fatal — occurred in the former Soviet republic in 2007, according to Amnesty International. "

"In its travel information, the U.S. State Department advises caution because of an increase in violence directed at non-Europeans and religious minorities."

This is violence against, most likely, black people in the Ukraine.

"The Associated Press reported that Ukrainian skinheads are likely getting inspiration and help from similar groups in neighboring Russia, where racist violence is even more pronounced."

So, skinheads in the Ukraine and skinheads in Russia.

But I'm not finding anything about ethnic Russians having a problem in the Ukraine before 2014.


"Russia and Ukraine in Intensifying Standoff"

From 2009

"President Dmitri A. Medvedev of Russia denounced Ukraine this month for “anti-Russian” policies, citing in particular its “incessant attempts” to harass Russia’s naval base in Sevastopol. Mr. Medvedev condemned Ukraine’s bid for NATO membership and its support for Georgia, and said he would not send an ambassador to Ukraine."

Nothing about ethnic Russians being killed or attacked in the Ukraine.

"Monday was Ukrainian independence day, and Russian prosecutors used the occasion to accuse Ukrainian soldiers and members of Ukrainian nationalist groups of fighting alongside Georgia’s military in the war last August."

Still nothing about ethnic Russians being killed.

There is a lot about the military bases though...

So, what do you have? I can't find anything.
If we are talking about a post-Soviet Ukraine, then, the level of violence was raised to the level "street protests/rare murders" in 2013-2014 by western-backed Maidan groups, and then, when pro-Western government came in power and there started street protests in Crimea, Donbass, the whole South-East Ukraine - NATO-backed Junta raised the violence to the level of "military operation".

Janukovich was "relatively pro-Russian" (as Trump is "relatively pro-white"), Yushenko was "relatively pro-Ukrainian" (as Baiden was "relatively pro-******"). But both of them more or less successfuly were keeping balance until west-backer Maidan. As there is more or less successful balance between racial/religious/political groups in the USA.

Now imagine, that during BLM protests, the government send the republican-states National Guard and White-Suprematist Volunteers to kill all those "dirty n#ggers" on spot. Highly likely it will mean a civil war in the USA.
 
If we are talking about a post-Soviet Ukraine, then, the level of violence was raised to the level "street protests/rare murders" in 2013-2014 by western-backed Maidan groups, and then, when pro-Western government came in power and there started street protests in Crimea, Donbass, the whole South-East Ukraine - NATO-backed Junta raised the violence to the level of "military operation".

Janukovich was "relatively pro-Russian" (as Trump is "relatively pro-white"), Yushenko was "relatively pro-Ukrainian" (as Baiden was "relatively pro-******"). But both of them more or less successfuly were keeping balance until west-backer Maidan. As there is more or less successful balance between racial/religious/political groups in the USA.

Now imagine, that during BLM protests, the government send the republican-states National Guard and White-Suprematist Volunteers to kill all those "dirty n#ggers" on spot. Highly likely it will mean a civil war in the USA.

I'm struggling to see the evidence you've posted.
 
******* hell.
Really, it seems to me, that you live in some kind of freaking CNN-verse, and I haven't a slightest idea from what point should I start to explain you the things that are that obvious for us.
 
I still wonder where their teams were on both sides of that savage encounter.

It's like one or two guys (both sides) are holding 100m of trench or busted up buildings.

85128.jpg

I can't speak a word in Russian but a russian speaker said on the Internet that the shouts heard during the entire fight was the ukrainian soldier desperately calling his buddy (shouting his callsign).

He also said that maybe the knife fight was not 100% fair because the ukrainian was ambushed and shot in the stomach as he entered the house.

Other people noticed both soldiers were hurt (the russian had blood wounds even before he engaged the ukrainian).
 
Maybe AlexPK, Esay, Zavulon, AntonToo or any other russian speaking members can expand on this.
 
If your country was under threat from a country four times larger than yours, would you not take any help you can get? Russia is 4 times larger and still lets the neo-Nazis into the military.

If you think that's deflection... then I'm sorry for you.
A country like that should have known better than barking on its big neighbor for thirty years. They've been shouting "Whip poor Will" long enough to have finally gotten what they asked for.
 
Yeah.... beating.... just. And Russia is FOUR TIMES LARGER and has a much bigger GDP and isn't seeing its internal structures being bombed to shit. And it's still stuck in the east.

They said they'd be in Kiev in 2 days.

As for your latter comments, they're just your fantasy. Yes, there's no appetite for war in those countries, but at the same time, the EU has a GDP of $19 trillion, which is about 9.5 times larger than that of Russia.

If Russia could fight the EU, it would have done, it hasn't. It's kept to Georgia, the Ukraine etc.
Two days in Kiev? show me where any Russian official said that, another fabrication, the fact is despite your deluded fantasies the Donbass front is crumbling, it's all down to Putin being kind, if it was Stalin Ukraine would be totally destroyed by now.
 
Really, it seems to me, that you live in some kind of freaking CNN-verse, and I haven't a slightest idea from what point should I start to explain you the things that are that obvious for us.

So you're unable to explain your own argument, and it's MY FAULT?

Give me a ******* break.
 
Two days in Kiev? show me where any Russian official said that, another fabrication, the fact is despite your deluded fantasies the Donbass front is crumbling, it's all down to Putin being kind, if it was Stalin Ukraine would be totally destroyed by now.

Did I say Russian officials came out officially and said this? No, I did not.

But that was what was being said all over the place. You can ignore the reality if you like, you ignore most of it anyway, just so you can suck Putin's dick
 
15th post
So you're unable to explain your own argument, and it's MY FAULT?
Yep. To explain you the things that you don't know, I need, for starters, understand what do you already know. And, as much as I can see - the most things about Russia you think you know - are plain lie or someone's delusional nonsense. If YOU want to study Russia - YOU need to be a bit more cooperative (at least in explaining what exactly do you want to study).
 
Did I say Russian officials came out officially and said this? No, I did not.
Ok. Copy that.

But that was what was being said all over the place.

Said by who?
You can ignore the reality if you like,
In reality, there was fragile equilibrium between Vatniks and Banderlogs in Ukraine before 2010. EU and US diplomatic and financial involvement in 2013-14 changed equilibrium for benefit of Banderlogs.
Russian SMO was able to change equilibrium for the benefit of Vatniks, if the NATO countries were smart enough to choose the optimal strategy - "Leave Ukraine, sponsor guerilla war in Western Ukraine, concentrate on defending what NATO can defend".
But they made the fatal mistake and choose to fight the war of atriction on the Russian terms and on the Russian land.
 
Yep. To explain you the things that you don't know, I need, for starters, understand what do you already know. And, as much as I can see - the most things about Russia you think you know - are plain lie or someone's delusional nonsense. If YOU want to study Russia - YOU need to be a bit more cooperative (at least in explaining what exactly do you want to study).

You're ******* making me wet my pants laughing right now.
 
Ok. Copy that.



Said by who?

In reality, there was fragile equilibrium between Vatniks and Banderlogs in Ukraine before 2010. EU and US diplomatic and financial involvement in 2013-14 changed equilibrium for benefit of Banderlogs.
Russian SMO was able to change equilibrium for the benefit of Vatniks, if the NATO countries were smart enough to choose the optimal strategy - "Leave Ukraine, sponsor guerilla war in Western Ukraine, concentrate on defending what NATO can defend".
But they made the fatal mistake and choose to fight the war of atriction on the Russian terms and on the Russian land.

Who said it? A lot of China, for a start. I believe it was literally said on Chinese (govt controlled) media, that it'd be over in 2 days.

The problem with Putin is that he's a cnut who only cares about himself and his own ego. Putin wants to bring the USSR back together.

Since December 31st 1999 when Putin took over Russia, Russia has had conflict with Chechnya, Georgia, the Ukraine, plus Syria and some African conflicts where Russia hires out its troops.

Why?

Well, because the countries of the former USSR that have pushed away from Russia are the Ukraine, Georgia and Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, the latter three Putin doesn't dare go to war with because NATO and the EU would pound Russia to dust.

So he's gone after the Ukraine and Georgia. He's also threatened Moldova with the Transnistria situation, literally annexing a part of their country.

Putin spent a lot of effort since 1999 destabilizing the Ukraine and trying to put his own man into the presidency and controlling their parliament.

The problem is he got angry that the Ukraine was moving more to the west, so he invaded, it's that simple.
 
Back
Top Bottom