ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 10,874
- 2,529
- 140
Comparing with Jewish Cossacks, may be...many good points.Fuck putin, he is not our main concern. I hate to admit it but china being trouble is the one thing trump got right. Our national strategic goals was to bring china int the middle east conflct and spend thier treasures there. Unfotunately the vaccum we left for china was filled by putin. Not what we expected but hey, you know why the good lord gave us plans dont ya. Now we are here and a target is suffering, not the right target but that is some times how traps work.100% agree the this thesis , i say bomb Muscovite ulus with Iran oil- gas sanctions !
"Putin is a gifted tactician, but not a strategic thinker. There is no reason to believe he intervened in Syria in order to aggravate the European refugee crisis. Indeed, his intervention was a strategic blunder because it embroiled him in a conflict with Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, which has hurt the interests of both.
![]()
But once Putin saw the opportunity to hasten the EU’s disintegration, he seized it. He has obfuscated his actions by talking of cooperating against a common enemy, Isis. He has followed a similar approach in Ukraine, signing the Minsk agreement but failing to carry out its provisions.
It is hard to understand why US and EU leaders take Putin at his word rather than judging him by his behaviour. The only explanation I can find is that democratic politicians seek to reassure their publics by painting a more favourable picture than reality justifies. ....
sis (and al-Qaida before it) has recognised the achilles heel of western civilisation – the fear of death – and learned how to exploit it. By arousing latent Islamophobia in the west and inducing the public and governments to treat Muslims with suspicion, it hopes to convince young Muslims that there is no alternative to terrorism. Once this strategy is understood, there is a simple antidote: refuse to behave the way your enemies want you to.
The threat emanating from Putin’s Russia will be difficult to counter. Failure to recognise it will make the task even more difficult.
"
![]()
Putin is a bigger threat to Europe’s existence than Isis | George Soros
The best way for Russia to avoid collapse is by making the EU implode first – by exacerbating the migration crisis and stoking Islamophobiawww.theguardian.com
but do you agree that Muscovy (other names juchi ulus, golden horde , russia, tartary ) as a primitive mongol empire always is choosing to use hardpower , meanwhile " China " (state created only in 1910) prefers to use soft-power?
Jewish Cossacks... Sounds like a terrestial fish.
Actually, some of "Ukrainian" nationalists claims that the word "Cossack" is a form of the word "Hazarian", and "Hazarians" were Jews. Both those statements highly likely are wrong, but nobody cares.
From another hand, current alliance between significant part of Jewish community and Neo-Nazi Radicals is anti-natural in the same way.
View attachment 335563
But nobody pretend that ideology must be logical.
This alliance exists only in the heads of people fed up by Russian fake news media. This leads to two mutually illogical conclusions - that so called coup was organized by Jews and the country is led by them now; and 'the coup' was organized by Ukrainian nationalists (or as they prefer neo-Nazis).
This collision can't be solved by a Russian brain, so they don't even try, and just reiterate one statement or the other depending of context.
Zelenskiy is a Jew, and representative of Kolomoiskiy (and Habbad cult) , and Ukrainian nationalists were a cannon fodder on Maidan and in Donbass conflict. It's just a plain facts. A word "Jidobanderovetz" (Jude-Banderlog) was invented in Ukraine.
Actually Ukraine is a failed state, controlled by many different foreign forces (from Turkey to Russia and the USA). Those forces play their games, but no one is really interested in the "total victory".
Habbad, Soros, US Int, Russians (Capitalists, Commies, Liberals, Panslavics, Orthodox Fanatics), Turks (Panturkists and Pan Islamists), Poles, Hungarians and many others... They play their games, but don't raise bets. Many alliances are temporary and innatural.
Exactly, they are just a tool. How can a tool be in alliance with anyone?
Something tells me that the word 'Zhydobanderovtsy' was invented by Russians.
About failed state. You can call it that. It depends on the meaning one puts in this definition. But definitely, the years since the Soviets fall have been lost. But the main reason of it is the Ukrainians themselves.