I never claimed that. What I said was gay men don't breed with lesbian women.
You would need both parents to pass on a mythical gay gene to have a gay kid. Homosexual reproduction is so rare that genetic gays would become extinct in 10 or 12 generations.
Ernie
You are assuming that gays give birth to gays which is simply untrue.
Those of you who believe gays do not or cannot reproduce and that would inevitably result in their own extinction are completely ignoring the fact that your own opinion means homosexuality should have occurred in the first place.
Simply put, it is heterosexuals who produce homosexuals.
And the procreation case often used against gays could also be used against us straights. Not all straight married couples have kids. Therefore, using Ernie's logic, any straight people who have not produced children cannot really be straight, right?
Oh, what a slippery slope...
Should straights who produce gay children be punished?
If it were possible to identify homosexuality in utero, would homophobes want those fetuses aborted?
They've figured out how to eliminate or lower the probability of a fetus getting breast cancer. It has to do with the father and mothers genes mixing. So they can identify the gene and get rid of it. Pretty cool? Would I do that if my kid had a high chance of being gay? Would I eliminate the gay gene? As much as I love gay people I would. Wouldnt want my kid being gay although I would love them if they turned out to be gay.
I think that is how a lot of us feel- though I would qualify it as:
I wouldn't want my child to face the discrimination that homosexuals face- if I could prevent my child from suffering
And historically this is what often happened, for women less by choice, by men in order to produce heirs/children to support them.
Then from this premise I am forced to conclude that if they can make a choice to mate with the opposite sex AND someone they don't particularly like (or plaster themselves with vodka beforehand), then becoming a homosexual may also be a choice. Behavior is a choice in and of itself. Acknowledging the need for continuance of a family line further acknowledges the heterosexual side of the human species.
To me there is a lot of common sense and contradictions all at once...
Let us get personal for a moment-
I, to my knowledge, have never made any conscious choice of who to be attracted to- I have been attracted to women as far back as I can remember.
But- I have made conscious choices - and sometimes bad choices- about which women I choose to have sex with.
I haven't seen any evidence to support the idea that attraction is a choice- and homosexuality is first and foremost about attraction.
The physical act can be done by anyone- heterosexuals can have homosexual sex, and homosexuals can have heterosexual sex- but I have never met anyone who has acknowledged an actual choice in attraction.