Protesters at the DNC are being contained by a..........

[Correll]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

The Principle is the same.

Walls to keep out people you don't want in.

I fully support this in both instances.

You support it in one.

 

[rightwinger]

I have a 300 foot stockade fence around my back yard to keep my dog in.

Does that mean I am not allowed to be against the Great Wall of Trump?

It makes you a hypocrite, yes. It also makes you a moron

My dog stays in the yard and I didn't spend $80 billion to do it

Is your yard 2600 miles long?

moron

Actually, it is not, that's why a 2600 mile, $80 billion wall makes no sense and a 300 foot, $1500 fence does

First of all, the $80B is ridiculous. Second of all, are you seriously claiming that a wall become less effective the longer it is? I mean that is where you're going? Come on man. that is ridiculous.

OF COURSE a wall would stop illegal immigration (or at least mitigate it to an acceptable level) Now if you want to argue that yes it would work, but is it the correct solution, that's fine, but to pretend like it wouldn't even work, well that's just stupid. If walls don't work, then build your house of chain link fence, I mean those walls don't keep anyone out anyway.

Build a 30 foot wall and they will bring a 31 foot ladder

The problem is economic not physical security. Spend your money prosecuting employers of illegal workers and you won't need your stupid wall

 

[ptbw forever]

Doesn't look that Fascist at all....

Where are the gas chambers?

 

[depotoo]

I heard it was 4 miles worth.

 

[rightwinger]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

The OP is pointing out the hypocrisy....do try and keep up

It is not hypocritical to support fences where they make sense and oppose border walls where they do not

it is however hypocritical to pretend the wall wouldn't work, which is EXACTLY what you morons try to do.

Show a 2600 mile wall that has worked

 

[ptbw forever]

It makes you a hypocrite, yes. It also makes you a moron

My dog stays in the yard and I didn't spend $80 billion to do it

Is your yard 2600 miles long?

moron

Actually, it is not, that's why a 2600 mile, $80 billion wall makes no sense and a 300 foot, $1500 fence does

First of all, the $80B is ridiculous. Second of all, are you seriously claiming that a wall become less effective the longer it is? I mean that is where you're going? Come on man. that is ridiculous.

OF COURSE a wall would stop illegal immigration (or at least mitigate it to an acceptable level) Now if you want to argue that yes it would work, but is it the correct solution, that's fine, but to pretend like it wouldn't even work, well that's just stupid. If walls don't work, then build your house of chain link fence, I mean those walls don't keep anyone out anyway.

Build a 30 foot wall and they will bring a 31 foot ladder

The problem is economic not physical security. Spend your money prosecuting employers of illegal workers and you won't need your stupid wall

Employers aren't importing anyone so....yeah.

 

[g5000]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

Exactly.

"Duuhhh...Democrats are...uh...against WALLZ!"

 

[Fair&Balanced]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

The OP is pointing out the hypocrisy....do try and keep up

It is not hypocritical to support fences where they make sense and oppose border walls where they do not

it is however hypocritical to pretend the wall wouldn't work, which is EXACTLY what you morons try to do.

Show a 2600 mile wall that has worked

Show me a 2600 mile wall that did NOT keep illegal immigrants out.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The Great Wall of China worked for hundreds of years. I'd be happy with one that worked for a few decades

 

[jillian]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

they only post what their rightwingnut blogosphere masters tell them to.

it's so funny.

 

[Moonglow]

WALL

That's right. The anti wall left have a wall to protect them from AMERICANS.

A wall of 3/8th ceramic tile??

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It makes you a hypocrite, yes. It also makes you a moron

My dog stays in the yard and I didn't spend $80 billion to do it

Is your yard 2600 miles long?

moron

Actually, it is not, that's why a 2600 mile, $80 billion wall makes no sense and a 300 foot, $1500 fence does

First of all, the $80B is ridiculous. Second of all, are you seriously claiming that a wall become less effective the longer it is? I mean that is where you're going? Come on man. that is ridiculous.

OF COURSE a wall would stop illegal immigration (or at least mitigate it to an acceptable level) Now if you want to argue that yes it would work, but is it the correct solution, that's fine, but to pretend like it wouldn't even work, well that's just stupid. If walls don't work, then build your house of chain link fence, I mean those walls don't keep anyone out anyway.

Build a 30 foot wall and they will bring a 31 foot ladder

The problem is economic not physical security. Spend your money prosecuting employers of illegal workers and you won't need your stupid wall

Bullshit. You can be poor & homeless in Mexico or fed clothed & educated here.

 

[Moonglow]

The Great Wall of China worked for hundreds of years. I'd be happy with one that worked for a few decades

No it didn't..

 

[Fair&Balanced]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

they only post what their rightwingnut blogosphere masters tell them to.

it's so funny.

LOL you're one to talk hack.

 

[Moonglow]

My dog stays in the yard and I didn't spend $80 billion to do it

Is your yard 2600 miles long?

moron

Actually, it is not, that's why a 2600 mile, $80 billion wall makes no sense and a 300 foot, $1500 fence does

First of all, the $80B is ridiculous. Second of all, are you seriously claiming that a wall become less effective the longer it is? I mean that is where you're going? Come on man. that is ridiculous.

OF COURSE a wall would stop illegal immigration (or at least mitigate it to an acceptable level) Now if you want to argue that yes it would work, but is it the correct solution, that's fine, but to pretend like it wouldn't even work, well that's just stupid. If walls don't work, then build your house of chain link fence, I mean those walls don't keep anyone out anyway.

Build a 30 foot wall and they will bring a 31 foot ladder

The problem is economic not physical security. Spend your money prosecuting employers of illegal workers and you won't need your stupid wall

Bullshit. You can be poor & homeless in Mexico or fed clothed & educated here.

So everybody in Mexico is poor, homeless and not educated?

 

[jillian]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

The OP is pointing out the hypocrisy....do try and keep up

It is not hypocritical to support fences where they make sense and oppose border walls where they do not

it is however hypocritical to pretend the wall wouldn't work, which is EXACTLY what you morons try to do.

Show a 2600 mile wall that has worked

Show me a 2600 mile wall that did NOT keep illegal immigrants out.

because with dumb Donald saying he's going to give a huge tax cut for rich people, I'm sure he'll have the money for idiocy like his wall. (which normal people know mexico is not paying for).

but good luck with that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[jillian]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

they only post what their rightwingnut blogosphere masters tell them to.

it's so funny.

LOL you're one to talk hack.

I can and do, actually. if you ever said anything worth discussing you'd know that.

but your "fair and balanced" misnomer is as fair and balanced as fake news where you take your marching orders.

typical fact-averse rightwingnut.


like I said. mexico isn't paying for dumb Donald's wall. no matter how much you trolls want it.

dismissed.

 

[jillian]

poor Frankie.

because a convention center is just like the border between the us and mexico.

damn, you people are getting more stupid by the minute. dumb Donald must be rubbing off on you.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This is like the fourth thread on this

I understand you guys get direction on what nonsense to post. But maybe you can explain why conservatives believe that someone who is opposed to an $80 billion 2000 mile wall must be opposed to a chain link security fence

they only post what their rightwingnut blogosphere masters tell them to.

it's so funny.

LOL you're one to talk hack.

What's funny is I don't goto blogs. I didn't even know about this till I saw it on CNN about an hour ago.

Jillian fail