Mr.Conley
Senior Member
The views I am about to express are not very fashionable. They are certainly not politically correct. But I believe what I am about to say are my own and must be expressed to protect the institution of marriage.
Too often in the media, currency is given to the theory that everyone should be allowed to marry regardless of gender, outlook and whether the two people are creating a suitable family environment in which to bring up children.
Well, it is time to ask some hard questions about this attitude. The only way we will save marriage is to reclaim the institution for the mainstream. Marriage is for normal people who want to raise children in a healthy and secure environment. This is why we should ban gays from marrying.
Homosexuals engage in unnatural practices. The unconventional views they hold inevitably lead to their children being teased in the playground and, no matter what studies may show, there is surely a greater risk they will grow up to be homosexuals themselves if they are exposed to dangerous ideas from a tender age.
No matter what homosexual propaganda may claim, homosexuality is not sanctioned by nature. There is not a single species in the animal kingdom that is gay. Even in the higher orders of primate, no species has conclusively shown to exhibit homosexual tendencies. Animals tend to be heterosexual, which shows that these views are surely instinctive, normal, natural and right.
Maybe you think it is OK for humans to differ from animals. Maybe you think consenting adults should be able to do what they like regardless of whether the average person agrees with their views.
Such a liberal approach is a slippery slope. When we allow gays to marry it says that homosexuality is OK. It encourages these people to foist the homosexual agenda on the rest of the community. Before long they will be trying to "turn" people to their “lifestyle”. Should we risk this? Gays are a small minority of the population, so only a small number of people would be inconvenienced by a ban. It would not even be discriminatory as homosexuals would still have the right to marry - so long as it was to a member of the opposite sex.
Let's not forget that we are not just talking about consenting adults. When you allow gays to marry it encourages them to adopt children. Sure, they might still have kids even if they cannot marry in the eyes of the law, but why legitimize it? Children are the true victims of gay marriages. Children don't get a say when they are born into a household practicing a homosexual lifestyle. Tiny children should not be subjected to cultural experiments and social engineering. Imagine how confused and guilty children would feel when they were indoctrinated with the bizarre idea that they are supposed to engage in sexual relations with members of the same sex.
Imagine also the teasing that children who have grown up in these "families" would be subjected to in the playground when other kids find out about their unusual views and practices. What are normal parents supposed to do when their children arrive home asking uncomfortable questions because they have been exposed to these groups at an age when they are too young to understand?
Before you know it, gay parents will be insisting preschool children read storybooks about the gay lifestyle in order to better understand it. There will be coloring books directed at four-year-olds showing gay families as thought they were normal.
What hope does a child indoctrinated with this sort of propaganda have of growing up to be normal? Can you really tell me they will not be more likely to grow up gay themselves?
Before you accuse me of hate speech, I should point out that I bear no grudge against homosexuals personally. "Love the sinner, hate the sin" is my policy.
CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
Too often in the media, currency is given to the theory that everyone should be allowed to marry regardless of gender, outlook and whether the two people are creating a suitable family environment in which to bring up children.
Well, it is time to ask some hard questions about this attitude. The only way we will save marriage is to reclaim the institution for the mainstream. Marriage is for normal people who want to raise children in a healthy and secure environment. This is why we should ban gays from marrying.
Homosexuals engage in unnatural practices. The unconventional views they hold inevitably lead to their children being teased in the playground and, no matter what studies may show, there is surely a greater risk they will grow up to be homosexuals themselves if they are exposed to dangerous ideas from a tender age.
No matter what homosexual propaganda may claim, homosexuality is not sanctioned by nature. There is not a single species in the animal kingdom that is gay. Even in the higher orders of primate, no species has conclusively shown to exhibit homosexual tendencies. Animals tend to be heterosexual, which shows that these views are surely instinctive, normal, natural and right.
Maybe you think it is OK for humans to differ from animals. Maybe you think consenting adults should be able to do what they like regardless of whether the average person agrees with their views.
Such a liberal approach is a slippery slope. When we allow gays to marry it says that homosexuality is OK. It encourages these people to foist the homosexual agenda on the rest of the community. Before long they will be trying to "turn" people to their “lifestyle”. Should we risk this? Gays are a small minority of the population, so only a small number of people would be inconvenienced by a ban. It would not even be discriminatory as homosexuals would still have the right to marry - so long as it was to a member of the opposite sex.
Let's not forget that we are not just talking about consenting adults. When you allow gays to marry it encourages them to adopt children. Sure, they might still have kids even if they cannot marry in the eyes of the law, but why legitimize it? Children are the true victims of gay marriages. Children don't get a say when they are born into a household practicing a homosexual lifestyle. Tiny children should not be subjected to cultural experiments and social engineering. Imagine how confused and guilty children would feel when they were indoctrinated with the bizarre idea that they are supposed to engage in sexual relations with members of the same sex.
Imagine also the teasing that children who have grown up in these "families" would be subjected to in the playground when other kids find out about their unusual views and practices. What are normal parents supposed to do when their children arrive home asking uncomfortable questions because they have been exposed to these groups at an age when they are too young to understand?
Before you know it, gay parents will be insisting preschool children read storybooks about the gay lifestyle in order to better understand it. There will be coloring books directed at four-year-olds showing gay families as thought they were normal.
What hope does a child indoctrinated with this sort of propaganda have of growing up to be normal? Can you really tell me they will not be more likely to grow up gay themselves?
Before you accuse me of hate speech, I should point out that I bear no grudge against homosexuals personally. "Love the sinner, hate the sin" is my policy.
CONTINUED IN NEXT POST
